Journals / Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Validity and Reliability of Mobility Inventory-Turkish Version

Mobilite Envanteri Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği

Pages
78–84
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Analysis demostrated that ME-Turkish version had a satisfactory level of reliability and validity

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Mobility Inventory (MI; Chambless et al. 1985) assesses the degree to which respondents avoid 26 typical agoraphobic situations, when alone and when accompanied.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of Mobility Inventory-Turkish Version.Method: Mobility Inventory was administered to 92 patients (male=33, female=59) with agoraphobia or panic disorder with agoraphobia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Analysis demostrated that ME-Turkish version had a satisfactory level of reliability and validity
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Mobility Inventory (MI; Chambless et al. 1985) assesses the degree to which respondents avoid 26 typical agoraphobic situations, when alone and when accompanied. The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of Mobility Inventory-Turkish Version.Method: Mobility Inventory was administered to 92 patients (male=33, female=59) with agoraphobia or panic disorder with agoraphobia. Analysis were applied to "when alone" and "when accompanied" subscales. Reliability of MI was analyzed by test-retest correlation, split-half technique, Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Construct validity was evaluated by factor analysis performed with principal component analysis and varimax rotation after the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett test had been performed. Results: "when alone" subscale: Cronbach coefficient was found as 0.93. In analysis performed by split-half method reliability coefficients of inventory halves were found as 0.892 and 0.878. Again spearmen-brown coefficient was found as 0.879 by the same analysis. Factor analysis revealed six basic factors. These six factors explained 70.4 %of the total variance. "when accompanied" subscale: Cronbach coefficient was found as 0.906. In analysis performed by split-half method reliability coefficients of inventory halves were found as 0.865 and 0.850. Again Spearmen-Brown coefficient was found as 0.766 by the same analysis. Factor analysis revealed seven basic factors. These seven factors explained 73.4 %of the total variance. Conclusion: Analysis demostrated that ME-Turkish version had a satisfactory level of reliability and validity

🔖

Cite This Article

KART, A., TÜRKÇAPAR, M. H. (2015). Validity and Reliability of Mobility Inventory-Turkish Version. Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 78–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/148618

References (5)

  1. Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği (1994) Mental Bozuklukların Tanısal ve Sayımsal El Kitabı, dördüncü baskı (DSM-IV) (Çev. Ed. E. Köroğlu) Hekimler Yayın Birliği, Ankara, 1995.
  2. Angst J (1998). Panic Disorder: History and epidemiology. Eur Psychiatry, 13: 51-55.
  3. Arrindell WA, Cox BJ, Van Der Ende J (1995). Phobic dimensions. II. Cross-national confirmation of the multidimensional structure underlying the mobility inventory (MI). Behav Res Ther, 33: 711-724.
  4. Atalay ND, Bayraktar E (1992)
  5. Panik Bozukluk. İzmir, Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Yayınları, s. 141.