SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ESTÜDAM Halk Sağlığı Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

DEVELOPMENT OF A SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CANCER PATIENTS IN TURKEY - TÜRKİYE'DEKİ KANSER HASTALARI İÇİN MEMNUNİYET ANKETİ GELİŞTİRME

Salih Akyüz(Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Atatürk Education and Research Hospital, Director of Administrative and Financial Services, Ankara, Turkey)0000-0001-7518-3989
Julide Yıldırım(TED University, Department of Economics, Ankara, Turkey)0000-0002-4739-6028
Dilek Öztaş(Yıldırım Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine Public Health Department, Ankara, Turkey)0000-0002-8687-7238
Pages
13–23
Publication Date
2019-01-18
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The instrument showed excellent psychometric properties, thus it can be incorporated into an existing hospital quality monitoring system to monitor patient satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose is to develop and validate a novel patient satisfaction questionnaire for Turkish cancer patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The survey questions relate to patient satisfaction with healthcare providers, medical care received and hospitals, in addition to questions exploring the expectations of the patients about advanced care. 710 cancer patients participated in the survey from eight public hospitals in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The instrument showed excellent psychometric properties, thus it can be incorporated into an existing hospital quality monitoring system to monitor patient satisfaction.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:faktör analizi · hasta memnuniyeti · yapısal eşitlik modellemesi

Abstract

Purpose is to develop and validate a novel patient satisfaction questionnaire for Turkish cancer patients. A questionnaire has been constructed. The survey questions relate to patient satisfaction with healthcare providers, medical care received and hospitals, in addition to questions exploring the expectations of the patients about advanced care. 710 cancer patients participated in the survey from eight public hospitals in Ankara. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis have been employed to verify the scale dimensions. A hypothetical model was evaluated by structural equation modelling to determine the adequacy of goodness-of-fit to sample data. The exploratory factor analysis identified three interpretable dimensions which explained 92 per cent of the variance for the patient satisfaction. The subscales derived from these factors were satisfaction from healthcare providers; satisfaction from hospital and satisfaction from health service. Each subscale had acceptable to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.70–0.95). Structural equation modelling resulted in a sufficient model fit of 19 items within three domains. This study developed and validated a reliable patient satisfaction instrument for cancer patients in Turkey. The instrument showed excellent psychometric properties, thus it can be incorporated into an existing hospital quality monitoring system to monitor patient satisfaction.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı, Türk kanser hastaları için yeni bir memnuniyet anketi geliştirmektir. Anket soruları, hastaların ileri düzey bakım konusundaki beklentilerini araştıran soruların yanı sıra sağlık hizmeti sağlayıcıları, tıbbi bakım ve hastanelerdeki hasta memnuniyeti ile ilgilidir. Ankara'daki sekiz devlet hastanesinden 710 kanser hastası araştırmaya katıldı. Ölçek boyutlarını doğrulamak için açımlayıcı ve de doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmıştır. Bir hipotetik model, örnek verilere uygunluğun yeterliliğini belirlemek için yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi, hasta memnuniyeti için varyansın yüzde 92'sini açıklayan üç yorumlanabilir boyut belirlemiştir. Bu faktörlerden elde edilen alt ölçekler; sağlık hizmeti sağlayıcılarından memnuniyet, hastane memnuniyeti ve sağlık hizmetlerinden memnuniyet. Her bir alt ölçek mükemmel iç tutarlılık nedeniyle kabul edilebilirdi (Cronbach alfa değeri 0.70-0.95 arasındaydı). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi, üç alan dahilinde 19 maddeden oluşan uygun bir model oluşturmuştur. Bu çalışma, Türkiye'de kanser hastaları için güvenilir bir hasta memnuniyeti aracını geliştirdi ve onayladı. Ölçme aracı mükemmel psikometrik özellikler gösterdi, böylece hasta memnuniyetini izlemek için mevcut bir hastane kalite izleme sistemine dahil edilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akyüz, S., Yıldırım, J., Öztaş, D. (2019). DEVELOPMENT OF A SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CANCER PATIENTS IN TURKEY - TÜRKİYE'DEKİ KANSER HASTALARI İÇİN MEMNUNİYET ANKETİ GELİŞTİRME. ESTÜDAM Halk Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.35232/estudamhsd.479076

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Teunissen, S.C., Wesker, W., Kruitwagen, C., de Haes, H.C., Voest, E.E., de Graeff, A. (2007). Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. Journal of Pain Symptom Management, 34(1), 94-104
  2. Akin, S., Can, G., Aydiner, A., Ozdilli, K., Durna, Z. (2010). Quality of life, symptom experience and distress of lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 14(5), 400-409
  3. Barbera, L.,Seow, H.,Howell, D.,Sutradhar, R.,Earle, C.&Liu, Y. et al.,(2010). Symptom burden and performance status in a population‐based cohort of ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer,116(24), 5767-5776
  4. Bağçivan, G., Tosun, N., Kömürcü, Ş., Akbayrak, N., Özet, A. (2009). Analysis of patient-related barriers in cancer pain management in Turkish patients. J Pain Symptom Manage, 38(5), 727-737
  5. Cleeland, C.S., Mendoza, T.R., Wang, X.S. et al. (2000). Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients. Cancer, 89(7), 1634-1646
  6. Stelfox, H.T., Gandhi, T.K., Orav, E.J., Gustafson, M.L. (2005). The relation of patient satisfaction with complaints against physicians and malpractice lawsuits. The American Journal of Medicine, 118, 1126–1133
  7. Heyland, D.K., Cook, D.J., Rocker, G.M. et al. (2010). The development and validation of a novel questionnaire to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care: the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire. Palliative Medicine, 24(7), 682-695
  8. Kristjanson, L.J. (1993). Validity and reliability testing of the FAMCARE Scale: measuring family satisfaction with advanced cancer care. Social Science & Medicine, 36(5), 693-701
  9. Yabroff, K.R., Mandelblatt, J.S. & Ingham, J. (2004). The quality of medical care at the end-of-life in the USA: existing barriers and examples of process and outcome measures. Palliative Medicine, 18(3), 202-216
  10. Brédart, A., Mignot, V., Rousseau, A. et al., (2004). Validation of the EORTC QLQ-SAT32 cancer inpatient satisfaction questionnaire by self-versus interview-assessment comparison. Patient Education and Counseling, 54(2), 207-212
  11. Schafer, J.L. & Graham, J.W. (2002). Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–77
  12. Kline, R. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press
  13. MacCallum, R.C.&Austin, J.T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226
  14. Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M.M., Ferlay, J., Ward, E., Forman, D. (2011). Global cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians., 61(2), 69-90
  15. Nunnally J & Bernstein I. (1994). Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  16. Beach, M.C., Sugarman, J., Johnson, R.L., Arbelaez, J.J., Duggan, P.S., Cooper, L.A. (2005). Do patients treated with dignity report higher satisfaction, adherence, and receipt of preventive care?. The Annals of Family Medicine, 3(4), 331-338
  17. Moore, I.N., Snyder, S.L., Miller, C., Qui An, A. (2007). Confidentiality and Privacy in Health Care from the Patient's Perspective: Does HIPPA Help. Health Matrix, 17, 215
  18. Heyland, D.K., Dodek, P., Rocker, G. et al.(2006). What matters most in end-of-life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174(5), 627-633
  19. Guerriere, D.N., Zagorski, B., Fassbender, K., Masucci, L., Librach, L., Coyte, P.C. (2010). Cost variations in ambulatory and home-based palliative care. Palliative Medicine,24(5), 523-532
  20. Ong, L.M., Visser, M.R., Lammes, F.B., de Haes, J.C. (2000). Doctor–patient communication and cancer patients’ quality of life and satisfaction. Patient Education and Counseling, 41(2), 145-156
  21. Hudon, C., Fortin, M., Haggerty, J.L., Lambert, M., Poitras, M.E. (2011). Measuring patients’ perceptions of patient-centered care: a systematic review of tools for family medicine. The Annals of Family Medicine., 9(2), 155-164.