Journals / Central Bank Review / 2013 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2013

External fınancıal stress and external fınancıng vulnerabılıty ın Turkey: some polıcy ımplıcatıons for fınancıal stabılıty

Pages
65–74
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results show that unlike the 1995-2000 period, FX non-core liabilities of the banking system are very sensitive to the external financial stress during the 2004-2012 period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:External financial stress is one of the causes of capital outflows and reduction in borrowing ability of emerging markets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sudden reversal of capital inflows and disruption in access to the international capital markets could be threat for the domestic financial stability as in the case of Asian Crisis in 1997-1998.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results show that unlike the 1995-2000 period, FX non-core liabilities of the banking system are very sensitive to the external financial stress during the 2004-2012 period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

External financial stress is one of the causes of capital outflows and reduction in borrowing ability of emerging markets. Sudden reversal of capital inflows and disruption in access to the international capital markets could be threat for the domestic financial stability as in the case of Asian Crisis in 1997-1998. This paper analyses the behavior of external financing sources of Turkey, namely FX non-core liabilities of the banking system and portfolio flows, for periods of 1995-2000 and 2004-2012. Our results show that unlike the 1995-2000 period, FX non-core liabilities of the banking system are very sensitive to the external financial stress during the 2004-2012 period. Portfolio flows decline in both cases but with a higher magnitude in the second period. Our results have important policy implications.

Özet

Gelişmekte olan ülkelerden sermaye çıkışlarının ve bu ülkelerin borçlanma kabiliyetlerindeki azalışın sebeplerinden biri yurt dışındaki finansal piyasalarda oluşan strestir. 1997–1998 Asya krizinde olduğu gibi, sermaye girişlerindeki ani tersine dönüşler ve uluslararası sermaye piyasalarından borçlanmanın zorlaşması ülke içi finansal istikrarı tehdit edebilmektedir. Bu çalışma 1995–2000 ve 2004–2012 dönemlerinde Türkiye’nin yurt dışı finansman kaynaklarının, diğer bir ifadeyle bankacılık sisteminin döviz cinsi çekirdek olmayan yükümlülüklerinin ve portföy akımlarının, yurt dışında yaşanan finansal stres dönemlerinde nasıl davrandığını incelemektedir. Elde ettiğimiz sonuçlar bankacılık sisteminin döviz cinsi çekirdek olmayan yükümlülüklerinin 2004–2012 döneminde, 1995–2000 dönemine göre yurt dışı finansal piyasalarda yaşanan strese daha fazla tepki verdiğini göstermektedir. Portföy akımları, 2004–2012 döneminde daha fazla olmak üzere her iki dönemde de yurt dışı finansal stres sonrası azalmaktadır. Bulunan sonuçlar önemli politika çıkarımları sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZEN, E., ŞAHİN, C., ÜNALMIŞ, İ. (2013). External fınancıal stress and external fınancıng vulnerabılıty ın Turkey: some polıcy ımplıcatıons for fınancıal stabılıty. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2013, 65–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/147361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Acharya, V. V., Pedersen, L., Philippon, T., and Richardson, M., 2010, “Measuring Systemic Risk” Technical Report, Department of Finance, NYU Stern School of Business. Adrian, T. and Brunnermeier, M. K., 2008. “CoVaR” Technical Report, FRB of New York. Staff Report No. 348. Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency (BRSA), 2010, “From Crisis to Financial Stability (Turkey Experience)” Working Paper. Central Bank of Republic of Turkey (CBRT), 2009,
  2. Financial Stability Report, October 2009.
  3. Duggey, R., 2009, “The Quantification of Systemic Risk and Stability: New Methods and Measures” FRB NBER Research Conference on Quantifying Systemic Risk. Gray, D. and Andreas A. J., 2010, “New Directions in Financial Sector and Sovereign Risk Management” Journal of Investment Management 8, 1, 23–38.
  4. Huang, X., Hao Z., and Haibin Z., 2009, “A Framework for Assessing the Systemic Risk of Major Financial Institutions” Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(11) 2036- 2049. IMF, 2009, Global Financial Stability Report April 2009. IMF, 2008, Global Financial Stability Report October 2008.
  5. Kritzman, M. L., Yuanzhen, P.S. and Roberto R., 2010, “Principal Components as a Measure of Systemic Risk” Revere Street Working Paper. Mishkin, F., 1995, “Comment on Systemic Risk” pp. 31-45 in Research in Financial Services: Banking, Financial Markets, and Systemic Risk (Vol. 7), ed. George Kaufman, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  6. Uygur, E., 2010, “The Global Crisis and the Turkish Economy” Working Papers 2010/3, Turkish Economic Association.