Journals / World Journal of Applied Economics / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Are Macroprudential Policies Effective Tools to Reduce Credit Growth in Emerging Markets?

Pages
73–89
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We argue that the insufficient number of MPP implementations is unable to prevent leakages in the system and reduce the effectiveness of MPPs under a global liquidity shock.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Macroprudential policies (MPPs) were relatively less used around the world before the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, using a data set of 30 developing and emerging market countries and panel VAR approach with GMM estimation, we con- tribute to this literature, first, by testing whether MPPs are effective in controlling domestic credit growth after a global liquidity shock.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We argue that the insufficient number of MPP implementations is unable to prevent leakages in the system and reduce the effectiveness of MPPs under a global liquidity shock.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Macroprudential policies (MPPs) were relatively less used around the world before the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC). In the aftermath of the GFC, they have become popular both in advanced and emerging market countries. Through time, the accumu- lation of new data across countries has led to a growing body of literature investigating the effectiveness of such policies. In this paper, using a data set of 30 developing and emerging market countries and panel VAR approach with GMM estimation, we con- tribute to this literature, first, by testing whether MPPs are effective in controlling domestic credit growth after a global liquidity shock. Second, we test whether MPPs are more effective when a combination of MPPs are used to control credit growth. Re- sults indicate that MPPs are effective tools to limit domestic credit growth, especially during the expansion phase of the credit cycle. Second, the number of MPP tools does matter to manage the magnitude and duration of the domestic credit growth effec- tively. We argue that the insufficient number of MPP implementations is unable to prevent leakages in the system and reduce the effectiveness of MPPs under a global liquidity shock.

🔖

Cite This Article

Küçükbıçakcı, F. P. E., Özen, E., Ünalmış, I. (2022). Are Macroprudential Policies Effective Tools to Reduce Credit Growth in Emerging Markets?. World Journal of Applied Economics, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 73–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/646435

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Abrigo, M. R. M., & Love, I. (2016). Estimation of Panel Vector Autoregression in Stata: a Package of Programs (Working Paper No. 201602). University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Economics. Aiyar, S., Calomiris, C. W., & Wieladek, T. (2014). Does Macro-Prudential Regulation Leak? Evidence from a UK Policy Experiment. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46 (S1), 181-214. doi:10.1111/jmcb.12086
  2. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2), 277–97. doi:10.2307/2297968 Avdjiev, S., Bruna, V., Koch, C., & Shin, H. S. (2018). The Dollar Exchange Rate as a Global Risk Factor: Evidence From Investment (Working Paper No. 695). Bank of International Settlements (BIS). Ba ̧skaya, Y. S., Binici, M., & Ken ̧c, T. (2017). International Banking and Cross-Border Effects of Regulation: Lessons from Turkey. International Journal of Central Banking, 13 (2), 379–403.
  3. Bianchi, J., & Mendoza, E. G. (2010).
  4. Overborrowing, Financial Crises and ’Macro- Prudential’ Taxes (Working Paper No. 16091). National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). doi:10.3386/w16091 Brunnermeier, M., & Sannikov, Y. (2014). A Macroeconomic Model with a Financial Sector. American Economic Review, 104 (2), 379–421. doi:10.1257/aer.104.2.379 Bruno, V., Shim, I., & Shin, H. S. (2017). Comparative Assessment of Macroprudential Policies. Journal of Financial Stability, 28, 183-202. doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2016.04.001 Bruno, V., & Shin, H. S. (2015). Cross-Border Banking and Global Liquidity. The Review of Economic Studies, 82 (2), 535–64. doi:10.1093/restud/rdu042 Cerutti, E., Claessens, S., & Laevenc, L. (2017). The Use and Effectiveness of Macroprudential Policies: New Evidence. Journal of Financial Stability, 28, 203–24. doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2015.10.004 Chari, V. V., & Kehoe, P. J. (2016). Bailouts, time inconsistency, and optimal regulation: A macroeconomic view. American Economic Review, 106 (9), 2458–93. doi:10.1257/aer.20150157 Cizel, J., Frost, J., Houben, A., & Wierts, P. (2019). Effective Macroprudential Policy: Cross-Sector Substitution from Price and Quantity Measures. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 51 (5), 1209–35. doi:10.1111/jmcb.12630 Claessens, S., Ghosh, S. R., & Mihet, R. (2013). Macro-prudential Policies to Mitigate Financial System Vulnerabilities. Journal of International Money and Finance, 39, 153– 85. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.06.023 Clement, P.