Journals / World Journal of Applied Economics / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Tourism Location Choice of Local and Foreign Tourist: A Perspective through Spatial Analysis

Pages
65–79
Publication Date
2023-10-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Most importantly, according to the spatial autocorrelation results, location choice made by foreign tourists is spatially dependent, but this is not true for domestic tourists.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The economic outreach of tourism businesses has undoubtedly had a significant contribution to the economic growth of countries and regions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Cross-sectional spatial analysis is applied to Turkish province-level data for 2002-2019, and the time and spatial effects of regional tourism demands are considered.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Most importantly, according to the spatial autocorrelation results, location choice made by foreign tourists is spatially dependent, but this is not true for domestic tourists.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:2002-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The economic outreach of tourism businesses has undoubtedly had a significant contribution to the economic growth of countries and regions. Attracting tourists to the tourist provinces is an important regional growth and development issue. The main aim of this study is to present the factors influencing the tourism location choice of both foreign and domestic tourists. Cross-sectional spatial analysis is applied to Turkish province-level data for 2002-2019, and the time and spatial effects of regional tourism demands are considered. Lisa and Geary’s cluster maps provide the regional clusters. Accordingly, Bitlis, Siirt and Tunceli are the common low-tourist number provinces surrounded by low-ranking provinces (low-low cluster), whereas Burdur is the common low province surrounded by high-ranking provinces (low-high cluster). Both domestic and foreign tourist location choices were strictly influenced by their choice in 2002, i.e., time consistency in location choice is valid. The location choices do not depend on whether the province is on the seaside or inland, which is contrary to our expectations. Foreign tourists’ location choices are influenced by domestic tourists’ location choices three times more than that domestic tourists. Most importantly, according to the spatial autocorrelation results, location choice made by foreign tourists is spatially dependent, but this is not true for domestic tourists.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLANTÜRK, Y., ÇETİN, D., AKSOY, E. (2023). Tourism Location Choice of Local and Foreign Tourist: A Perspective through Spatial Analysis. World Journal of Applied Economics, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.22440/wjae.8.2.2

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Akarsu, G. (2022). Spatial Panel Data Analysis of the Relationship between Tourism and Income Inequality. Anatolia, 33(4), 537-549. doi:10.1080/13032917.2021.1969959 Almeida, A., Golpe, A., & Justo, R. (2021). Regional Tourist Heterogeneity in Spain: A Dynamic Spatial Analysis. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 21, 100643. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100643 Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7799-1
  2. Anselin, L. (1995). Local Indicators of Spatial Association — LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93-115. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x Anselin, L. (1999). Spatial Econometrics (Staff Paper). Bruton Center, School of Social Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Texas. Anselin, L. (2003).
  3. Spatial Externalities, Spatial Multipliers, and Spatial Econometrics. International Regional Science Review, 26(2), 153-166. doi:10.1177/0160017602250972 Anselin, L. (2019). A Local Indicator of Multivariate Spatial Association: Extending Geary’s c. Geographical Analysis, 51(2), 133-150. doi:10.1111/gean.12164 Brau, R. (2008). Demand-driven Sustainable Tourism? A Choice Modelling Analysis. Tourism Economics, 14(4), 691-708. doi:10.5367/000000008786440201 Brida, J. G., Cortes-Jimenez, I., & Pulina, M. (2016). Has the Tourism-led Growth Hypothesis been Validated? A Literature Review. Current Issues in Tourism, 19(5), 394-430. doi:10.1080/13683500.2013.868414 Capone, F., & Boix, R. (2008). Sources of Growth and Competitiveness of Local Tourist Production Systems: An Application to Italy (1991–2001). Annals of Regional Science, 42(1), 209-224. doi:10.1007/s00168-007-0133-7
  4. Chhetri, P., Corcoran, J., & Hall, M. (2008). Modelling the Patterns and Drivers of Tourism related Employment for South-East Queensland, Australia- A spatial Econometric Approach. Tourism Recreation Research, 33(1), 25-38. doi:10.1080/02508281.2008.11081287 Eugenio-Martin, J. L., Martin Morales, N., & Scarpa, R. (2004). Tourism and Economic Growth in Latin American Countries: A Panel Data Approach (Working Paper No. 26). FEEM. doi:10.2139/ssrn.504482 Fingleton, B., & Lopez-Bazo, E. (2006). Empirical Growth Models with Spatial Effects. Papers in Regional Science, 85(2), 177-198. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2006.00074.x Gooroochurn, N., & Hanley, A. (2005). Spillover Effects in Long-haul Visitors between Two Regions. Regional Studies, 39(6), 727-738. doi:10.1080/00343400500213606 Gunay Aktas, S., Yuncu, D., & Kantar, Y. M. (2017)