Journals / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Conjunctival Limbal Autograft Implantation in Primary and Recurrent Pterygium

Pages
71–74
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The recurrence rate was very low.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results and recurrence rate after pterygium excision with a conjunctival limbal autograft in patients with primary and recurrent pterygium.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Patients who had primary (Group 1) or recurrent (Group 2) pterygium and who underwent pterygium excision with a conjunctival limbal autograft implantation (with interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures or fibrin glue) were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The recurrence rate was very low.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results and recurrence rate after pterygium excision with a conjunctival limbal autograft in patients with primary and recurrent pterygium. Methods: Patients who had primary (Group 1) or recurrent (Group 2) pterygium and who underwent pterygium excision with a conjunctival limbal autograft implantation (with interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures or fibrin glue) were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with a follow-up of at least 6 months were included. The primary outcome measures were the spherical equivalent (SE) of manifest refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity, distance corrected visual acuity, topographical astigmatism, and keratometry values measured preoperatively and at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. Complication and recurrence data were also recorded. Results: A total of 145 patients were included in the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups preoperatively. When all of the cases were evaluated, there was a statistically significant correlation between pterygium length and corneal astigmatism. After surgery, SE, corneal astigmatism, and topographical astigmatism measurements had decreased significantly in both groups when compared with the preoperative values. Postoperative visual acuity, corneal astigmatism, and manifest cylinder values were similar between the groups. There was no recurrence in Group 1. The recurrence rate was 1.75% in Group 2. Conclusion: Pterygium excision with a conjunctival limbal autograft is a safe and effective method for the surgical treatment of primary and recurrent pterygium. The recurrence rate was very low.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRCAN, A. (2018). Conjunctival Limbal Autograft Implantation in Primary and Recurrent Pterygium. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 71–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/147266

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Hirst LW. Recurrent pterygium surgery using pterygium extended removal followed by extended conjunctival transplant: recurrence rate and cosmesis. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1278– 86. [CrossRef] Shiroma H, Higa A, Sawaguchi S, Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Amano S, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of pterygium in a southwestern island of Japan: the Kumejima Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:766–71.e1. [CrossRef] Srinivasan S, Dollin M, McAllum P, Berger Y, Rootman DS, Slomovic AR. Fibrin glue versus sutures for attaching the conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery: a prospective observer masked clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:215–8. [CrossRef] Xu Y, Zhou HM, Li J, Ke BL, Xu X. Efficacy of treatment for pterygium by autologous conjunctival transplantation and mitomycin C. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012;125:3730–4.
  2. Huerva V, March A, Martinez-Alonso M, Muniesa MJ, Sanchez C. Pterygium surgery by means of conjunctival autograft: long term follow-up. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2012;75:251–5. [CrossRef] Kucukerdonmez C, Karalezli A, Akova YA, Borazan M. Amniotic membrane transplantation using fibrin glue in pterygium surgery: a comparative randomised clinical trial. Eye (Lond) 2010;24:558–66. [CrossRef] Chui J, Coroneo MT, Tat LT, Crouch R, Wakefield D, Di Girolamo N. Ophthalmic pterygium: a stem cell disorder with premalignant features. Am J Pathol 2011; 178:817–27. [CrossRef] Sekundo W, Droutsas K, Cursiefen C. Operative techniques for surgical treatment of primary and recurrent pterygia. [Article in German]. Ophthalmologe 2010;107:525–8. [CrossRef] Jiang J, Gong J, Li W, Hong C. Comparison of intra-operative 0.02% mitomycin C and sutureless limbal conjunctival autograft fixation in pterygium surgery: five-year follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol 2015;93:e568–72. [CrossRef] Kurian A, Reghunadhan I, Nair KG. Autologous blood versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autograft adherence in sutureless pterygium surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2015;99:464–70. [CrossRef] Taylan Sekeroglu H, Erdem E, Dogan NC, Yagmur M, Ersoz R, Dogan A. Sutureless amniotic membrane transplantation combined with narrow-strip conjunctival autograft for pterygium. Int Ophthalmol 2011;31:433–8. [CrossRef] Kenyon KR, Wagoner MD, Hettinger ME. Conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology 1985;92:1461–70. [CrossRef] Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Burkett G, Tseng SC. Comparison of conjunctival autografts, amniotic membrane grafts, and primary closure for