Journals / BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of prudent investment hypothesis in ISE

İnançlı mülkiyet ilkesinin İMKB'de incelenmesi

Pages
81–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analysis results suggest that institutional investors invest prudently in ISE companies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim of this study is to examine whether institutional investors pursue prudent investment policy in ISE.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Empirical analysis is performed by examining the difference among various firm characteristics of company portfolios constructed according to institutional ownership for the years, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analysis results suggest that institutional investors invest prudently in ISE companies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim of this study is to examine whether institutional investors pursue prudent investment policy in ISE. Empirical analysis is performed by examining the difference among various firm characteristics of company portfolios constructed according to institutional ownership for the years, 2005, 2006 and 2007. Firm characteristics are market value, leverage ratio, turnover ratio, standard deviation of stock returns and return-on-assets. Analysis results suggest that institutional investors invest prudently in ISE companies. Institutional investors seem to prefer companies with big scale, high level of return-on-assets, low level of total risk, stock liquidity, and leverage ratio.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, kurumsal yatırımcıların, İMKB’deki yatırımlarının inançlı mülkiyet ilkesine uygun olup olmadığının incelenmesidir. Çalışmada, 2005, 2006 ve 2007 yılları için kurumsal yatırımcı sahiplik oranlarına göre oluşturulan şirket portföylerinin bazı özelliklerinin birbirlerinden farklı olup olmadığı t-testi yardımıyla incelenmiştir. Söz konusu özellikler, ilgili şirketin piyasa değeri, kaldıraç oranı, işlem görme oranı, hisse senedi getirilerinin standart sapması ve aktif karlılık oranıdır. Analiz sonuçları, kurumsal yatırımcıların İMKB’de inançlı mülkiyet ilkesine uygun biçimde yatırım yaptıklarını göstermiştir. Kurumsal yatırımcılar, büyük ölçekli, aktif karlılığı yüksek, toplam riski, kaldıraç oranı ve hisse senedi likiditesi düşük şirketlere yatırım yapmayı tercih etmişlerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANDIR, S. Y. (2009). Investigation of prudent investment hypothesis in ISE. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 81–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/147245

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Badrinath, S. G., Gay, G. D. ve Kale, J. R. (1989). Patterns of Institutional Investment, Prudence, and the managerial Safety-Net Hypothesis. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 56(4): 605-629
  2. Beaumont, P. H. (2004). Financial Engineering Principles. USA: John Wiley & Sons
  3. Bhattacharya, P. S. ve Graham, M. (2007). Institutional Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from Finland. SSRN Working Paper, No: 1000092
  4. Bushee, B. J. (1998). “The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior. Accounting Review, 73(3): 305-333
  5. Chaganti, R. ve Damanpour F. (1991). Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure, and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7): 479-491
  6. Chui, A. C. W. ve Wei, K. C. J. (1998). Book-to-Market, Firm Size, and the Turn of the Year Effect: Evidence from Pacific-Basin Emerging Markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 6(3-4): 275-293
  7. Davis, E. P. ve Steil, B. (2001). Institutional Investors. USA: MIT Press
  8. Droms, W. G. (1992). Fiduciary Responsibilities of Investment Managers and Trustees. Financial Anaysts Journal, 48(4): 58-64
  9. Eakins, S. G., Stansell, S. R. ve Wertheim, P. E. (1998). Institutional Portfolio Composition: An Examination of the Prudent Investment Hypothesis. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 38(1): 93-109
  10. Fama, E. F. ve French, K. R. (1992). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2): 427-465
  11. Fama, E. F. ve French, K. R. (1995). Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns. Journal of Finance, 50(1): 131-155
  12. Faugere, C. ve Shawky, H. A. (2003).Volatility and Institutional Investor Holdings in a Declining Market: A Study of Nasdaq During the year 2000. Journal of Applied Finance, 13(2): 32-42
  13. Feibel, B. J. (2003). Investment Performance Measurement. USA: John Wiley & Sons
  14. Grinstein, Y. ve Michaely, R. (2005). Institutional Holdings and Payout Policy. Journal of Finance, 60(3): 1389-1426
  15. Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics. USA: McGraw-Hill
  16. Hansen, G. S. ve Hill, C. W. L. (1991). Are Institutional Investors Myopic? A Time- Series Study of Four Technology-Driven Industries. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1): 1-16
  17. Harris, R. J. (2001). A Primer for Multivariate Statistics. USA: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
  18. İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası,
  19. İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası Yıllık Bülteni, (2007) htt