SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences / 2026 / Sayı: 66

Use of free labour in the media within the scope of citizen journalism: A case study of the main news bulletin on Show TV

Yurttaş gazeteciliği kapsamında medyada ücretsiz emek kullanımı: Show TV ana haber bülteni üzerine bir örnek olay incelemesi

Sertaç Kaya(İstanbul Aydın University, Faculty of Communication, Department of Journalism)0000-0003-3483-572X
Pages
67–92
Publication Date
2024-07-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings that while the use of citizen-generated content varies from newscast to newscast, such images are present in every broadcast and enable the exploitation of free labour and the creation of value.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Citizens’ ability to interact with content and participate in its production has enabled shifts in journalism techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Media organisations are now using user-generated content derived from images submitted by the public to report news that their reporters do not have access to.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings that while the use of citizen-generated content varies from newscast to newscast, such images are present in every broadcast and enable the exploitation of free labour and the creation of value.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yurttaş gazeteciliği · kullanıcı tarafından oluşturulan içerik · kitle kaynak kullanımı

Abstract

Citizens’ ability to interact with content and participate in its production has enabled shifts in journalism techniques. Citizens’ ability to record experiences, thanks to digital technologies and internet usage, has offered new perspectives on the news and helped place certain events on the agenda. Media organisations are now using user-generated content derived from images submitted by the public to report news that their reporters do not have access to. This research addresses the process by which media organisations exploit free labour by incorporating images captured by citizens into their broadcasts. To this end, news coverage on Show TV from May 9 to 15, 2022 and May 9 to 15, 2023 was analysed, with content analysis conducted to determine the proportion of non-professional images in the broadcasts. An in-depth interview was also conducted with the person in charge of Show TV’s WhatsApp Notification Line, which allows citizens to contribute to news production and gain insight into the operational processes of this structure. The findings that while the use of citizen-generated content varies from newscast to newscast, such images are present in every broadcast and enable the exploitation of free labour and the creation of value.

Özet

Vatandaşların içerikle etkileşime girebilme ve üretime katılabilme yeteneği, gazetecilik pratiklerinde değişimlere olanak sağladı. Dijital teknolojiler ve internet kullanımı sayesinde vatandaşların deneyimlerini kayıt altına alabilmesi, haberlere yeni bakış açıları kazandırmış ve bazı olayların gündeme gelmesine yardımcı olmuştur. Medya kuruluşları artık kendi muhabirlerinin erişemeyebileceği haberleri bildirmek için kullanıcı tarafından oluşturulan içeriklerden elde edilen görselleri kullanıyor. Bu araştırma, vatandaşların çektiği görsellerin yayınlarına dahil edilmesi yoluyla medya kuruluşlarının ücretsiz emekten yararlanma sürecini ele almaktadır. Bu amaçla 9-15 Mayıs 2022 ve 9-15 Mayıs 2023 tarihlerinde Show TV’de yayınlanan haberler incelenerek yayınlarda profesyonel olmayan görsellerin oranının belirlenmesi amacıyla içerik analizi yapıldı. Vatandaşların haber üretimine katkıda bulunmasına olanak sağlayan Show TV’nin WhatsApp Bildirim Hattı sorumlusu ile de bu yapının operasyonel süreçleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak amacıyla derinlemesine görüşme gerçekleştirildi. Bulgular, vatandaşların ürettiği içeriğin kullanımının haber programından haber programına farklılık gösterse de, bu tür görüntülerin her yayında mevcut olduğunu, ücretsiz emeğin sömürülmesine ve değer yaratılmasına olanak sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kaya, S. (2024). Use of free labour in the media within the scope of citizen journalism: A case study of the main news bulletin on Show TV. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, Sayı: 66, 67–92. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2024-1422945

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (74)

  1. Allan, S. (2013). Citizen witnessing: Revisioning journalism in times of crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press. google scholar
  2. Allan, S., Sonwalkar, P., & Carter, C. (2007). Bearing witness: Citizen journalism and human rights issues. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 5(3), 373-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767720701662139 google scholar
  3. Alpagu, H. (2015). Değer kavramı, paylaşmak ve bilgi teknolojisi çağında yaşam. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 51, 22-31. google scholar
  4. Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0?: Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Bristol: JISC. google scholar
  5. Andrejevic, M. (2012). Estranged free labor. In Digital labor (pp. 149-164). Routledge. google scholar
  6. Ardevol-Abreu, A., Hooker, C. M., & Gil de Zuniga, H. (2018). Online news creation, trust in the media, and political participation: Direct and moderating effects over time. Journalism, 19(5), 611-631. https://doi. org/10.1177/1464884917700447 google scholar
  7. Atton, C. (2008). Citizen journalism. The International Encyclopedia of Communication, 1-5. google scholar
  8. Atton, C. (2009). Alternative and citizen journalism. K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 285-298). Routledge. google scholar
  9. Bardoel, J. & Deuze, M. (2001). Network journalism: Converging competencies of old and new media professionals. Australian Journalism Review, 23(2), 91-103. google scholar
  10. Baruch, F. (2021). Transnational fandom: Creating alternative values and new ıdentities through digital labor. Television & New Media, 22(6), 687-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419898553 google scholar
  11. Blaagaard, B. B. (2013). Situated, embodied and political expressions of citizen journalism. Journalism Studies, 14(2), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.718547 google scholar
  12. Brabham, D. C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. Cambridge: The MIT Press. google scholar
  13. Bruns, A. & Highfield, T. (2012). Blogs, Twitter, and breaking news: The produsage of citizen journalism. R. A. Lind (Ed.), Produsing theory in a digital world: The intersection of audiences and production in contemporary theory (pp. 15-32). New York: Peter Lang. google scholar
  14. Buckingham, D. (2009). Speaking back? In search of the citizen journalist. D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Ed.), Video cultures: Media technology and everyday creativity (pp. 93-114). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. google scholar
  15. Cevizci, A. (1999). Felsefe sözlüğü. İstanbul: Paradigma. google scholar
  16. Choudhury, N. (2014). World Wide Web and ıts journey from Web 1.0 to Web 4.0. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 5(6), 8096-8100. google scholar
  17. Chung, D. S., Nah, S., & Yamamoto, M. (2018). Conceptualizing citizen journalism: US news editors’ views. Journalism, 19(12), 1694-1712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916686596 google scholar
  18. Cohen, N. S. (2013). Commodifying free labor online: Social media, audiences, and advertising. In The Routledge companion to advertising and promotional culture (pp. 177-191). Routledge. google scholar
  19. Darwish, A., & Lakhtaria, K. I. (2011). The impact of the new Web 2.0 technologies in communication, development, and revolutions of societies. Journal of Advances in Information Technology, 2(4), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.4304/jait.2.4.204-216 google scholar
  20. Deuze, M., Bruns, A. & Neuberger, C. (2007). Preparing for an age of participatory news. Journalism Practice, 1(3), 322-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780701504864 google scholar
  21. Dyer-Witheford, N. (2015). Cyber-Proletariat: Global labour in the digital vortex. London: Pluto Press. google scholar
  22. Estelles-Arolas, E. & Gonzalez-Ladron-de-Guevara, F. (2012). Towards an ıntegrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information Science, 38(2), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512437638 google scholar
  23. Fast, K., Örnebring, H., & Karlsson, M. (2016). Metaphors of free labor: A typology of unpaid work in the media sector. Media, Culture & Society, 38(7), 963-978. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344371663586 google scholar
  24. Fraysse, O. & O’Neil, M. (2015). Introduction: Hacked in the USA: Prosumption and digital labour. O. Fraysse & M. google scholar
  25. O’Neil (Ed.), Digital Labour and Prosumer Capitalism (pp. 1-20). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  26. Fuchs, C. (2014a). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage. google scholar
  27. Fuchs, C. (2014b). Digital labor and Karl Marx. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  28. Goode, L. (2009). Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New media & society, 11(8), 1287-1305. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341393 google scholar
  29. Graeff, E. (2019). Monitorial citizenship. The international encyclopedia of media literacy, 1-15. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0169 google scholar
  30. Hadland A., Borges-Rey, E. & Cameron J. (2019). Mobile phones and the news: How UK mainstream news broadcasting is stalling the video revolution. Convergence, 25(3), 428-448. https://doi. org/10.1177/1354856517703964 google scholar
  31. Harcup, T. (2013). Alternative journalism, alternative voices. Oxon: Routledge. google scholar
  32. Harvey, D. (2018). A companion to Marx’s capital. London: Verso Books. google scholar
  33. Hermida, A. (2012). Social journalism: Exploring how social media is shaping journalism. E. Siapera & A. Veglis (Ed.), The handbook of global online journalism (pp. 309-329). Sussex: John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  34. Hermida, A. & Thurman, N. (2008). A clash of cultures: The integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at british newspaper websites. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802054538 google scholar
  35. Holton, A. E., Coddington, M. & Gil de Zuniga, H. (2013). Whose news? Whose values?: Citizen journalism and journalistic values through the lens of content creators and consumers. Journalism Practice, 7(6), 720-737. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.766062 google scholar
  36. Huws, U. (2014). Labor in the global digital economy: The cybertariat comes of age. NYU Press. google scholar
  37. Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 google scholar
  38. Karaman, M., & Önder, M. (2017). Yurttaş gazeteciliğinin ana akım medyaya etkisi: WhatsApp ihbar hatları örneği. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 5(2), 164-180. google scholar
  39. Ledford, J. L. (2008). Search engine optimization bible. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing. google scholar
  40. Lewis, S. C., Kaufhold, K. & Lasorsa, D. L. (2010). Thinking about citizen journalism: The philosophical and practical challenges of user-generated content for community newspapers. Journalism Practice, 4(2), 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700903156919 google scholar
  41. Lievrouw, L. A. (2011). Alternative and activist new media. Sussex: John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  42. Manfredi Sanchez, J. L., Rojas-Torrijos, J. L. & Herranz de la Casa, J. M. (2015). Entrepreneurial journalism: Sports journalism in Spain. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 70, 69-90. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2015-1035EN google scholar
  43. Manosevitch, I. & Tenenboim, O. (2017). The multifaceted role of user-generated content in news websites: An analytical framework. Digital Journalism, 5(6), 731-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1189840 google scholar
  44. Martens, M. (2011). Transmedia teens: Affect, immaterial labor, and user-generated content. Convergence, 17(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856510383363 google scholar
  45. Marx, K. (1968). Theories of surplus-value. Part II. Progress Publisher. google scholar
  46. Marx, K. (1982). Capital: A critique of political economy. Volume one. Penguin Books. google scholar
  47. Medya Faresi (2022a, May 8). 7 mayıs 2022 cumartesi reyting sonuçları. Retrieved 21 June 2024. https://www. medyafaresi.com/haber/son-dakika-7-mayis-2022-cumartesi-reyting-sonuclarikardeslerim-survivor-fox-haber-guldur-guldur-show/988369 google scholar
  48. Medya Faresi (2022b, May 9). 8 mayıs 2022 cumartesi reyting sonuçları. Retrieved 21 June 2024. https://www. medyafaresi.com/haber/son-dakika-8-mayis-2022-pazar-reyting-sonuclari-yargi-survivor-all-star-teskilat-fox-ana-haber/988452 google scholar
  49. Nah, S., Namkoong, K., Record, R., & Van Stee, S. K. (2017). Citizen journalism practice increases civic participation. Newspaper Research Journal, 38(1), 62-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532917698444 google scholar
  50. Negri, A. (1989). The politics of subversion: A manifesto for the twenty-first century. Polity Press. google scholar
  51. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. London: Hodder and Stoughton. google scholar
  52. Noor, R. (2017). Citizen journalism vs. mainstream journalism: A study on challenges posed by amateurs. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 3(1), 55-76. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.3.1.4 google scholar
  53. Palmer, L. (2013). “iReporting” an uprising: CNN and citizen journalism in network culture. Television & New Media, 14(5), 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476412446487 google scholar
  54. Pantti, M. (2013). Getting closer? Encounters of the national media with global images. Journalism Studies, 14(2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.718551 google scholar
  55. Pavlik, J. V. (2001). Journalism and new media. New York: Columbia University Press. google scholar
  56. Petersen, S. M. (2008). Loser generated content: From participation to exploitation. First Monday, 13(3). http:// firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/ index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2141/1948 google scholar
  57. Prodnik, Jernej (2012). A note on the ongoing processes of commodification: From the audience commodity to the social factory. TripleC, 10(2), 274-301. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v10i2.409 google scholar
  58. Quandt, T. (2011). Understanding a new phenomenon: The significance of participatory journalism. A. B. Singer, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, et al. (Eds.), Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers (pp. 155-176). Wiley-Blackwell. google scholar
  59. Ritzer, G. & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673 google scholar
  60. Roberts, J. (2019). The erosion of ethics: From citizen journalism to social media. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 17(4), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-01-2019-0014 google scholar
  61. Robinson, S. & Deshano, C. (2011). Citizen journalists and their third places: What makes people exchange information online (or not)? Journalism Studies, 12(5), 642-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2011.557559 google scholar
  62. Schudson, M. (1998). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. New York: Martin Kessler Books. google scholar
  63. Singer J, Hermida A, Domingo D, et al. (2011). (Eds.) Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 155-176. google scholar
  64. Smythe, Dallas W. 1981. On the audience commodity and its work. In Dependency road: Communications, capitalism, consciousness, and Canada, (pp. 22-51). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. google scholar
  65. Terranova, T. (2000). Free labor: producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text, 18(2_63), 33-58. https:// doi.org/10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33 google scholar
  66. Toffler, A. (1981). The third wave: The classic study of tomorrow. Bantam. google scholar
  67. Tronti, M. (2019). Workers and capital. Verso Books. google scholar
  68. Van der Haak, B., Parks M. & Castells, M. (2012). The future of journalism: Networked journalism. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2923-2938. google scholar
  69. Van der Wurff, R. (2001). The impact of the internet on media content. L, Küng, R. Picard & R. Towse (Ed.), The internet and the mass media (pp. 65-86). London: Sage. google scholar
  70. Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098245 google scholar
  71. Vultee, F., Scott Burgess, G., Frazier, D. & Mesmer, K. (2020). Here’s what to know about clickbait: Effects of ımage, headline and editing on audience attitudes. Journalism Practice, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.20 20.1793379 google scholar
  72. Wall, M. (2015). Citizen journalism: A retrospective on what we know, an agenda for what we don’t. Digital Journalism, 3(6), 797-813. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.1002513 google scholar
  73. Wittel, A. (2012). Digital Marx: Toward a political economy of distributed media. TripleC, 10(2), 313-333. https:// doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v10i2.379 google scholar
  74. Yazdanipoor, F., Faramarzi, H. & Bicharanlou, A. (2022). Digital Labour and the generation of surplus value on Instagram. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 20(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v20i2.1304 google scholar