Journals / Erciyes İletişim Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

Professionalism? Restricting Expressions? Determining Journalists' Individual Social Media Uses Based on Institutional Guidelines

Profesyonellik mi? İfadelerin Kısıtlanması mı?: Gazetecilerin Bireysel Sosyal Medya Kullanımlarının Kurum Yönergeleri Üzerinden Belirlenmesi

Sertaç Kaya(İSTANBUL AYDIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3483-572X
Pages
405–422
Publication Date
2024-07-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, it was noted that the journalists who were interviewed did not view the guidelines as a form of intervention or censorship.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The usage of social media by journalists might lead to problems with the conflict between their personal and professional identities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research showed that the guidelines were designed to safeguard corporate identity and reliability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, it was noted that the journalists who were interviewed did not view the guidelines as a form of intervention or censorship.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Medya · Gazeteci · Sosyal Medya Yönergeleri

Abstract

The usage of social media by journalists might lead to problems with the conflict between their personal and professional identities. Because it can be difficult to distinguish between private and public posts, media companies are developing guidelines to regulate how their employees use social media. The study examines how institutional guidelines for journalists' use of social media can influence their personal use of social media. Through document analysis, the guidelines of both the BBC and Anadolu Agency in Türkiye were examined with the aim of uncovering the expectations of these institutions. Both documents were analyzed using the Python programming language. Furthermore, with the goal to uncover the journalists' perceptions of the guidelines, in-depth interviews were carried out with personnels from BBC and Anadolu Agency. The research showed that the guidelines were designed to safeguard corporate identity and reliability. Moreover, it was noted that the journalists who were interviewed did not view the guidelines as a form of intervention or censorship.

Özet

Gazetecilerin sosyal medyayı kullanması, kişisel ve profesyonel kimlikleri arasındaki çatışmada sorunlara yol açabilmektedir. Özel ve herkese açık gönderiler arasında ayrım yapmak zor olabileceğinden medya şirketleri, çalışanlarının sosyal medyayı nasıl kullanacağını düzenlemek için yönergeler geliştirmektedir. Çalışma, gazetecilerin sosyal medya kullanımına ilişkin kurum yönergelerinin, kişisel sosyal medya kullanımlarını nasıl etkileyebileceğini incelemektedir. Doküman analizi yoluyla hem BBC'nin hem de Anadolu Ajansı'nın yönergeleri incelenerek bu kurumların beklentilerinin ortaya çıkarılması amaçlandı. Her iki belge de Python programlama dili kullanılarak analiz edildi. Ayrıca gazetecilerin yönergeye ilişkin algılarını ortaya çıkarmak amacıyla BBC ve Anadolu Ajansı çalışanları ile derinlemesine görüşmeler yapıldı. Araştırma, yönergelerin kurumsal kimliği ve güvenilirliği korumak için tasarlandığını gösterdi. Ayrıca görüşme yapılan gazetecilerin yönergeleri bir müdahale ya da sansür olarak görmedikleri kaydedildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kaya, S. (2024). Professionalism? Restricting Expressions? Determining Journalists' Individual Social Media Uses Based on Institutional Guidelines. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 405–422. https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1442004

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Ahmad, A. N. (2010). Is Twitter a useful tool for journalists? Journal of Media Practice, 11(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.11.2.145_1
  2. Allan, S. (2006). Online News: Journalism and the internet. Open University Press.
  3. Anadolu Ajansı. (2022). Sosyal medya. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/p/sosyal-medya
  4. BBC. (2020). Guidance: Individual use of social media. https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidance/individual-use-of-social-media/
  5. Bossio, D. (2017). Journalism and social media: Practitioners, Organisations and Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Bossio, D., & Sacco, V. (2017). From “selfies” to breaking tweets: How journalists negotiate personal and professional identity on social media. Journalism Practice, 11(5), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1175314
  7. Brems, C., Temmerman, M., Graham, T., & Broersma, M. (2017). Personal branding on Twitter: How employed and freelance journalists stage themselves on social media. Digital Journalism, 5(4), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1176534
  8. Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2012). Social media as beat: Tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice, 6(3), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.663626
  9. Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2013). Twitter as a news source: How Dutch and British newspapers used tweets in their news coverage. Journalism Practice, 7(4), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802481
  10. Canter, L. (2013). The interactive spectrum: The use of social media in UK regional newspapers. Convergence, 19(4), 472–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856513493698
  11. Canter, L. (2015). Personalised Tweeting: The emerging practices of journalists on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 3(6), 888–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.973148
  12. Dalton, J. C., & Crosby, P. C. (2013). Digital identity: How social media are influencing student learning and development in college. Journal of College and Character, 14(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/JCC-2013-0001
  13. Djerf-Pierre, M., Ghersetti, M., & Hedman, U. (2020). Appropriating social media: The changing uses of social media among journalists across time. In S. Allan, C. Carter, S. Cushion, L. Dencik, I. Garcia-Blanco, J. Harris, R. Sambrook, K. Wahl-Jorgensen, & A. Williams (Eds.), The Future of Journalism: Risks, Threats and Opportunities (pp. 46–57). Routledge.
  14. Gulyas, A. (2013). The influence of professional variables on journalists’uses and views of social media: A comparative study of Finland, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Digital Journalism, 1(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.744559
  15. Hanusch, F., & Bruns, A. (2017). Journalistic branding on Twitter: A representative study of Australian journalists’ profile descriptions. Digital Journalism, 5(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1152161
  16. Harlow, S. (2018). Quality, innovation, and financial sustainability: Central American entrepreneurial journalism through the lens of its audience. Journalism Practice, 12(5), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1330663
  17. Hedman, U., & Djerf-Pierre, M. (2013). The social journalist: Embracing the social media life or creating a new digital divide? Digital Journalism, 1(3), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2013.776804
  18. Hermida, A. (2012). Social journalism: Exploring how social media is shaping journalism. In E. Siapera & A. Veglis (Eds.), The Handbook of Global Online Journalism (pp. 309–328). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  19. Hermida, A. (2013). “#Journalism: Reconfiguring journalism research about Twitter, one tweet at a time. Digital Journalism, 1(3), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2013.808456
  20. Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend: Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430
  21. Hill, S., & Bradshaw, P. (2018). Mobile-first journalism: Producing news for social and interactive media. Routledge.
  22. Holton, A. E. (2016). Intrapreneurial informants: An emergent role of freelance journalists. Journalism Practice, 10(7), 917–927. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1166069
  23. Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C., & Holton, A. E. (2012). Normalizing Twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825
  24. Legard, R., Keegan, J., & Ward, K. (2003). In-depth interviews. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (pp. 138–170). SAGE Publications.
  25. Lewis, S. C., Holton, A. E., & Coddington, M. (2014). Reciprocal journalism. Journalism Practice, 8(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.859840
  26. Liu, H. (2007). Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1083-6101.2007.00395.X
  27. Malmelin, N., & Villi, M. (2016). Audience community as a strategic resource in media work: Emerging practices. Journalism Practice, 10(5), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1036903
  28. Manfredi Sánchez, J. L., Rojas-Torrijos, J. L., & Herranz de la Casa, J. M. (2015). Entrepreneurial journalism: Sports journalism in Spain. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 70, 69–90. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2015-1035EN
  29. McGregor, S. C. (2019). Social media as public opinion: How journalists use social media to represent public opinion. Journalism, 20(8), 1070–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919845458
  30. Mellado, C., & Hermida, A. (2021). The promoter, celebrity, and joker roles in journalists’ social media performance. Social Media and Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121990643/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_2056305121990643-FIG1.JPEG
  31. Molyneux, L., Holton, A., & Lewis, S. C. (2018). How journalists engage in branding on Twitter: Individual, organizational, and institutional levels. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1386–1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1314532
  32. Netchitailova, E. P. (2014). The flâneur, the badaud and empathetic worker. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31269/TRIPLEC.V12I1.500
  33. Newman, N., Dutton, W. H., & Blank, G. (2013). Social media in the changing ecology of news: The fourth and fifth estates in Britain. International Journal of Internet Science, 7(1), 6–22. http://www.worldinternetproject.net/#about
  34. Nölleke, D., Grimmer, C. G., & Horky, T. (2017). News sources and follow-up communication: Facets of complementarity between sports journalism and social media. Journalism Practice, 11(4), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1125761
  35. Papacharissi, Z. (2011). A networked self. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 304–319). Routledge.
  36. Pavlik, J. V. (2004). A sea-change in journalism: Convergence, journalists, their audiences and sources. Convergence, 10(4), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/135485650401000404/ASSET/135485650401000404.FP.PNG_V03
  37. Phillips, A. (2012). Sociability, speed and quality in the changing news environment. Journalism Practice, 6(5–6), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.689476
  38. Powers, M., & Vera-Zambrano, S. (2018). How journalists use social media in France and the United States: Analyzing technology use across journalistic fields. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2728–2744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731566
  39. Ruotsalainen, J., & Villi, M. (2018). Hybrid engagement: Discourses and scenarios of entrepreneurial journalism. Media and Communication, 6(4), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.17645/MAC.V6I4.1465
  40. Wach, E., & Ward, R. (2013). Learning about qualitative document analysis. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/2989/PP%20InBrief% 2013%20QDA%20FINAL2.pdf?sequence=4
  41. Weaver, D. H., & Willnat, L. (2016). Changes in US journalism: How do journalists think about social media? Journalism Practice, 10(7), 844–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1171162
  42. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  43. Manfredi Sánchez, J. L., Rojas-Torrijos, J. L., & Herranz de la Casa, J. M. (2015). Entrepreneurial journalism: Sports journalism in Spain. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 70, 69–90. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2015-1035EN