SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science / 2018 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 4

Analysis of Job Satisfaction Levels of Police with Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Samsun

Taner Tunç(ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5548-8475
Seval Enöz(ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY)
Pages
134–139
Publication Date
2018-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the study, the sub-dimensions that influence general job satisfaction and the associations between these were tested with structural equation modeling.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Job satisfaction is a spiritual pleasure which employees feel in exchange of their job.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Based on this, it can be said that job satisfaction of employees increases when expectations comply with the properties of the work.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the study, the sub-dimensions that influence general job satisfaction and the associations between these were tested with structural equation modeling.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:: Structural Equation Modeling · Job Satisfaction · Police

Abstract

Job satisfaction is a spiritual pleasure which employees feel in exchange of their job. Based on this, it can be said that job satisfaction of employees increases when expectations comply with the properties of the work. Spiritual pleasure is very important in terms of providing more efficient and qualified service in sectors that provide services. For this purpose, a study was conducted on police working in law enforcement agency which is thought to have the greatest responsibility on the society’s order and trust and which provides the most important services to society. The sample of the study consists of 396 police in the city center and towns of Samsun. In the study, the sub-dimensions that influence general job satisfaction and the associations between these were tested with structural equation modeling.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tunç, T., Enöz, S. (2018). Analysis of Job Satisfaction Levels of Police with Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Samsun. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 4, 134–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/1467537

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Anderson, J. C., Gerbing, D.W., 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach”, Psychological Bulletin, 411-423.
  2. Bentler, P.M., ve Chou, C.P., 1987. Practical Issues in Structural Modeling Sociological Methods & Research,16: 78-117.
  3. Bollen, K.A., 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables, John Wiley, New York.
  4. Cerrah, İ. ve Semiz, E., 2000. “Yirmi Birinci Yüzyılda Polis Temel Sorunlar-Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar”, Sibel Matbaası, Haziran, Ankara.
  5. Hamamcı, Z., Oskargil, E., İnanç, N.,2004. Okullarda Çalışan Psikolojik Danışmanların Mesleki Yönden Kendilerini Geliştirmeleri ve Mesleki Doyumları İle İlişkisinin İncelenmesi, XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.
  6. İncir, G., 1990. Çalışanların Motivasyonuna Genel Bir Bakış, Milli Protaktivite Merkezi Yayınları, No: 313, Ankara.
  7. Joreskog, K. Sörbom, D., 2001. LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide, Scientific Software International Inc.
  8. Kelloway E.K., 1998. Using Lisrel for Stuctural Equation Modelling: A Researcher’s Guide, Sage Publications.
  9. Kline, R. B., 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, (Second Edition), NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.
  10. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., 2003. “Evaluating The Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures”, Methods of Psychological Research Online,8(2), 23-74.
  11. Schultz, D. P., Schultz, S. E., 1986. “Psychology and Industry Today; An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational, Psyhology”, (4th Edition), NewYork McMillian Publishing Com.
  12. Sümer, N., 2000. “Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Örnek Uygulamalar”, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-73.
  13. Yılmaz, V., 2004. LISREL ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Tüketici Şikayetlerine Uygulanması, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, cilt 4,no.1,s.77-90
  14. Yılmaz, V., 2004. LISREL ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Tüketici Şikayetlerine Uygulanması, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, cilt 4,no.1,s.77-90