SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4

Augmented Reality in Cultural Heritage: A Systematic Review of Mobile Applications and User Experience Evaluation

Nurettin Şenyer(SAMSUN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2324-9285
Aya Alzatma(SAMSUN UNIVERSITY)0009-0003-8156-8430
Pages
1245–1257
Publication Date
2025-07-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results demonstrate that Google Lens excels in AI-driven accessibility, Civilisations AR in 3D educational depth, Timelooper in narrative immersion, and Artivive in dynamic art overlays.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This systematic review compares four leading AR applications for cultural heritage interpretation, providing comprehensive insights for future AR development in cultural contexts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drawing on peer-reviewed studies from 2017 -2025, sourced from academic databases including Google Scholar, the review highlights diverse implementation strategies and immersion levels through systematic comparative analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results demonstrate that Google Lens excels in AI-driven accessibility, Civilisations AR in 3D educational depth, Timelooper in narrative immersion, and Artivive in dynamic art overlays.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017 -2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Augmented reality · Cultural heritage · Digital transformation

Abstract

This systematic review compares four leading AR applications for cultural heritage interpretation, providing comprehensive insights for future AR development in cultural contexts. It analyzes Google Lens, Civilisations AR, Timelooper, and Artivive across technological methods, user experiences, and effectiveness at cultural heritage sites. Drawing on peer-reviewed studies from 2017 -2025, sourced from academic databases including Google Scholar, the review highlights diverse implementation strategies and immersion levels through systematic comparative analysis. Results demonstrate that Google Lens excels in AI-driven accessibility, Civilisations AR in 3D educational depth, Timelooper in narrative immersion, and Artivive in dynamic art overlays. The findings suggest that next-generation AR applications should adopt hybrid approaches combining the best features of each model while addressing current limitations in content scalability and user engagement.

Özet

This systematic review compares four leading AR applications for cultural heritage interpretation, providing comprehensive insights for future AR development in cultural contexts. It analyzes Google Lens, Civilisations AR, Timelooper, and Artivive across technological methods, user experiences, and effectiveness at cultural heritage sites. Drawing on peer-reviewed studies from 2017 -2025, sourced from academic databases including Google Scholar, the review highlights diverse implementation strategies and immersion levels through systematic comparative analysis. Results demonstrate that Google Lens excels in AI-driven accessibility, Civilisations AR in 3D educational depth, Timelooper in narrative immersion, and Artivive in dynamic art overlays. The findings suggest that next-generation AR applications should adopt hybrid approaches combining the best features of each model while addressing current limitations in content scalability and user engagement.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şenyer, N., Alzatma, A. (2025). Augmented Reality in Cultural Heritage: A Systematic Review of Mobile Applications and User Experience Evaluation. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4, 1245–1257. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1709786

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Artivive GmbH. 2024. Artivive (Version 4.8.2) [Mobile app]. AppStore. URL:https://apps.apple.com/app/artivive/id1188737494
  2. BBC. 2018. Civilisations AR launches. BBC MediaCentre. URL:https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/latestnews/2018/Civilisations-ar-launches
  3. Boboc RG, Băutu E, Gîrbacia F, Popovici N, Popovici DM. 2022. Augmented reality in cultural heritage: an overview of the last decade of applications. Appl Sci, 12(19): 9859
  4. de Morais Sarmento MLF. 2024. Design of Immersive Museum Experiences: Improving Visitor Engagement Through Co-Creation, Augmented Reality and Gamification. Universidade do Porto, Institute of Design and Fine Arts, Porto, Portugal, pp: 24-65.
  5. Ghouaiel N, Garbaya S, Cieutat JM, Jessel JP. 2017. Mobile augmented reality in museums: towards enhancing visitor's learning experience. Int J Virtual Reality, 17(1): 21-31
  6. Google LLC. 2024. Google Lens (Version 1.17). URL:https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.ar.lens
  7. Hammady R, Ma M, Powell A. 2018. User experience of markerless augmented reality applications in cultural heritage museums: ‘museumeye’ as a case study. In: Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics: 5th Int Conf, AVR 2018, Otranto, Italy, June 24–27, 2018, Proc Part II 5: 349-369. Springer Int Publishing
  8. Kleftodimos A, Evagelou A, Triantafyllidou A, Grigoriou M, Lappas G. 2023. Location-based augmented reality for cultural heritage communication and education: the Doltso district application. Sensors, 23(10): 4963
  9. Lampropoulos G, Keramopoulos E, Diamantaras K. 2020. Enhancing the functionality of augmented reality using deep learning, semantic web and knowledge graphs: A review. Vis Informatics, 4(1): 32-42
  10. Michel-Acosta P, Chaljub-Hasbún J, Cabero-Almenara J, Conte-Ayala ED, Peguero-García J, Pepín-Ubrí J. 2024. Evaluating an augmented reality app for learning about climate change among university students: A pilot study. Rev Electrón Educare, 28(3): 227-245
  11. Rinaldi AM, Russo C, Tommasino C. 2022. An augmented reality CBIR system based on multimedia knowledge graph and deep learning techniques in cultural heritage. Computers, 11(12): 172
  12. Sylaiou S, Dafiotis P. 2020. Storytelling in virtual museums: engaging a multitude of voices. In: Visual Computing for Cultural Heritage, Springer, Cham, pp: 369-388
  13. The Org, n.d. Yigit Yigiter – TimeLooper org chart. The Org. URL:https://theorg.com/org/timelooper/org-chart/yigit-yigiter (accessed date: May 30, 2025)
  14. TimeLooper Inc, 2024. Xplore - AR by TimeLooper [Mobile app]. Google Play Store. URL:https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.Timelooper.XPLORE.