SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Fuzzy Logic Approach in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis for Risk Assessment

Gökçe Özden Gürcan(ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ESKİŞEHİR MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0002-5386-1985
Pages
1420–1431
Publication Date
2026-05-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the fuzzy FMEA method is effective at prioritizing product defects in ceramic sanitary ware production.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Considering the increasing competitiveness of the ceramic industry within the country, export volumes, and the standards it must meet, the quality expectations of customers have increased.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this field, quality tools, such as FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis), are used to quantify the risk levels of existing defects, identify and prioritize them, and guide corrective measures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the fuzzy FMEA method is effective at prioritizing product defects in ceramic sanitary ware production.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Failure mode and effects analysis · Fuzzy logic · Manufacturing

Abstract

Considering the increasing competitiveness of the ceramic industry within the country, export volumes, and the standards it must meet, the quality expectations of customers have increased. In this field, quality tools, such as FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis), are used to quantify the risk levels of existing defects, identify and prioritize them, and guide corrective measures. However, the lack of specialized technicians, the inefficiency of the visual inspection process, subjectivity, and qualitative failures involving uncertainty impose limitations on FMEA. The fuzzy FMEA approach is proposed to address the limitations of FMEA. The fuzzy FMEA system was identified through a case study of an industrial production unit. The RPN values of FMEA and fuzzy FMEA were evaluated and compared. The results show that the fuzzy FMEA method is effective at prioritizing product defects in ceramic sanitary ware production.

Özet

Considering the increasing competitiveness of the ceramic industry within the country, export volumes, and the standards it must meet, the quality expectations of customers have increased. In this field, quality tools, such as FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis), are used to quantify the risk levels of existing defects, identify and prioritize them, and guide corrective measures. However, the lack of specialized technicians, the inefficiency of the visual inspection process, subjectivity, and qualitative failures involving uncertainty impose limitations on FMEA. The fuzzy FMEA approach is proposed to address the limitations of FMEA. The fuzzy FMEA system was identified through a case study of an industrial production unit. The RPN values of FMEA and fuzzy FMEA were evaluated and compared. The results show that the fuzzy FMEA method is effective at prioritizing product defects in ceramic sanitary ware production.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gürcan, G. Ö. (2026). Fuzzy Logic Approach in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis for Risk Assessment. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 1420–1431. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1802773

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Akın, B. (1998). Hata türü ve etkileri analizi. Bilim Teknik Yayınevi.
  2. Balaraju, J., Govinda Raj, M., & Murthy, C. S. (2019). Fuzzy-FMEA risk evaluation approach for LHD machine—A case study. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 18(4), 257–268.
  3. Ben-Daya, M., & Raouf, A. (1993). A revised failure mode and effects analysis model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 10(1), 43–47.
  4. Boral, S., Boral, S., Howard, I., Chaturvedi, S., McKee, K., & Naikan, V. (2020). An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA. Engineering Failure Analysis, 110, Article 104411.
  5. Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, C. E. (1995). Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 50(2), 203–213.
  6. Cardiel-Ortega, J., & Serrato, R. (2023). Failure mode and effect analysis with a fuzzy logic approach. Systems, 11(7), Article 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11070348
  7. Chen, C., Zhang, R., Guo, J., Liu, H., Hua, C., Yan, H., Qi, B., & Jin, T. (2025). A new approach for failure mode and effect analysis based on Fermatean fuzzy Z-number weighted Muirhead mean operator. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 143, Article 110080.
  8. Crawley, F. (2020). Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA). In F. Crawley (Ed.), A guide to hazard identification methods (2. bs., ss. 103–109). Elsevier.
  9. Dagsuyu, C., Göçmen, E., Narlı, M., & Kokangül, A. (2016). Classical and fuzzy FMEA risk analysis in a sterilization unit. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101, 286–294.
  10. De Barros, L. C., Bassanezi, R. C., & Lodwick, W. A. (2017). A first course in fuzzy logic, fuzzy dynamical systems, and biomathematics (Cilt 347). Springer.
  11. Dinmohammadi, F., & Shafiee, M. (2020). A fuzzy-FMEA risk assessment approach for offshore wind turbines. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 4(2).
  12. Ekmekçioğlu, M., & Can Kutlu, A. (2012). A fuzzy hybrid approach for fuzzy process FMEA: An application to a spindle manufacturing process. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 5(4), 611–626.
  13. Fattahi, R., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2018). Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment. Safety Science, 102, 290–300.
  14. Guimarães, A. C. F., & Lapa, C. M. F. (2004). Fuzzy FMEA applied to PWR chemical and volume control system. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 44(3), 191–213.
  15. Gupta, G., & Mishra, R. P. (2020). Comparative analysis of traditional and fuzzy FMECA approach for criticality analysis of conventional lathe machine. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 11, 379–386.
  16. Jahangoshai Rezaee, M., Yousefi, S., Eshkevari, M., Valipour, M., & Saberi, M. (2020). Risk analysis of health, safety and environment in chemical industry integrating linguistic FMEA, fuzzy inference system and fuzzy DEA. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 34, 201–218.
  17. Jiao, S., Zhu, X., Liu, J. Q., Sun, Z., & Zhang, R. (2025). A more realistic failure mode and effect analysis method considering causal relationships and consensus mechanism. Engineering Failure Analysis, 169, Article 109253.
  18. Li, J., Fang, H., & Song, W. (2019). Modified failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty: A rough cloud theory-based approach. Applied Soft Computing, 78, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.02.029
  19. Liu, H. T., & Tsai, Y. L. (2012). A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry. Safety Science, 50(4), 1067–1078.
  20. Liu, H., Liu, L., Liu, N., & Mao, L. (2012). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 12926–12934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.031
  21. Liu, H., You, J., & Duan, C. (2017). An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 203–214.
  22. Mandal, S., & Maiti, J. (2014). Risk analysis using FMEA: Fuzzy similarity value and possibility theory based approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(7), 3527–3537.
  23. Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., & Jakhar, S. (2018). Benchmarking the risk assessment in green supply chain using fuzzy approach to FMEA: Insights from an Indian case study. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(8), 2660–2687.
  24. Pillay, A., & Wang, J. (2003). Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 79(1), 69–85.
  25. Pokorádi, L., Koçak, S., & Tóth-Laufer, E. (2021). Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using summative defuzzification methods. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 18(11), 107–123.
  26. Qin, J., Xi, Y., & Pedrycz, W. (2020). Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for risk assessment based on interval type-2 fuzzy evidential reasoning method. Applied Soft Computing, 89, Article 106134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106134
  27. Razzaq, A., Aized, T., Ameer, M. F., Khan, S. U., Khan, M. I., & Abdullaeva, B. S. (2024). Failure mode and effects analysis of suction hose manufacturing industry: A case study of automobiles. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 18(9), 6809–6824.
  28. Rong, Y., Yu, L., Liu, Y., Simić, V., Pamucar, D., & Garg, H. (2024). A novel failure mode and effect analysis model based on extended interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy approach for risk analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 136, Article 108892.
  29. Shahri, M., Jahromi, A., & Houshmand, M. (2021). Failure mode and effect analysis using an integrated approach of clustering and MCDM under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 72, Article 104591.
  30. Sharma, R. K., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2005). Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(9), 986–1004.
  31. Shi, H., Wang, L., Li, X., & Liu, H. (2019). A novel method for failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning and fuzzy Petri nets. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(6), 2381–2395.
  32. Subriadi, A. P., & Najwa, N. F. (2020). The consistency analysis of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) in information technology risk assessment. Heliyon, 6(1), Article e03161.
  33. Tay, K. M., & Lim, C. P. (2006). Fuzzy FMEA with a guided rules reduction system for prioritization of failures. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(8), 1047–1066.
  34. Testik, Ö., & Unlu, E. (2022). Fuzzy FMEA in risk assessment for test and calibration laboratories. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 39(2), 575–589.
  35. Tian, Z., Wang, J., & Zhang, H. (2018). An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy, and VIKOR methods. Applied Soft Computing, 72, 636–646.
  36. Tooranloo, H., & Ayatollah, A. (2016). A model for failure mode and effects analysis based on intuitionistic fuzzy approach. Applied Soft Computing, 49, 238–247.
  37. Türkşen, İ. B. (2012). A review of developments from fuzzy rule bases to fuzzy functions. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 41(3), 347–359.
  38. Wan, C., Yan, X., Zhang, D., Qu, Z., & Yang, Z. (2019). An advanced fuzzy Bayesian-based FMEA approach for assessing maritime supply chain risks. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125, 222–240.
  39. Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Poon, G. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1195–1207.
  40. Zhu, G. J., & Hu, J. (2022). A fuzzy rough number extended AHP and VIKOR for failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 51, Article 101454.
  41. Zimmermann, H. J. (1996). Fuzzy set theory and its applications (3. bs.). Springer.
  42. Zúñiga, A., Fernandes, J., & Branco, P. (2023). Fuzzy-based failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis applied to cyber power grids. Energies, 16(12), Article 4705.