Journals / Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 5

Design, Fabrication, and QPSK-Based Validation of a Compact Two-Port MIMO Antenna with Defected Ground Structure for 5 GHz WLAN Applications

Cem Göçen(IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8086-5690
Pages
2738–2748
Publication Date
2026-09-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The MIMO results show S11 below −18 dB around 5.5 GHz and an S12 level close to -10 dB, corresponding to approximately 10 dB inter-port isolation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study presents the design, fabrication, and measurement of a compact FR4-based printed monopole antenna and its two-port MIMO configuration for 5 GHz WLAN applications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The optimized antenna is mainly evaluated around the 5.5 GHz WLAN region and provides acceptable impedance matching at the target frequency, with simulated and measured S11 values of approximately −10.90 dB and −10.62 dB at 5.5 GHz, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The MIMO results show S11 below −18 dB around 5.5 GHz and an S12 level close to -10 dB, corresponding to approximately 10 dB inter-port isolation.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:MIMO antenna · FR4 antenna · WLAN

Abstract

This study presents the design, fabrication, and measurement of a compact FR4-based printed monopole antenna and its two-port MIMO configuration for 5 GHz WLAN applications. The single antenna consists of a microstrip-fed chamfered rectangular radiator and a partial ground plane with a narrow defected ground slot. The optimized antenna is mainly evaluated around the 5.5 GHz WLAN region and provides acceptable impedance matching at the target frequency, with simulated and measured S11 values of approximately −10.90 dB and −10.62 dB at 5.5 GHz, respectively. The gain estimated using the substitution method is approximately 1.30 dBi at 5.5 GHz. The antenna is then extended to a symmetrical two-port MIMO structure using a shared partial ground plane and a central I-shaped defected ground structure for coupling reduction. The MIMO results show S11 below −18 dB around 5.5 GHz and an S12 level close to -10 dB, corresponding to approximately 10 dB inter-port isolation. Under the S-parameter-based diversity evaluation, the maximum ECC is approximately 0.01, while the DG remains close to 10 dB. A 2 × 2 OTA QPSK testbed was implemented by connecting both ports of the transmitting and receiving MIMO prototypes to two independent transmit and two independent receive RF chains, respectively. The measured link-level EVM values were 7.4%, 4.8%, and 6.2% at 5.18, 5.50, and 5.825 GHz, respectively. The results show that the proposed antenna provides a practical balance between compact size, simple fabrication, and acceptable WLAN-band MIMO performance.

Özet

This study presents the design, fabrication, and measurement of a compact FR4-based printed monopole antenna and its two-port MIMO configuration for 5 GHz WLAN applications. The single antenna consists of a microstrip-fed chamfered rectangular radiator and a partial ground plane with a narrow defected ground slot. The optimized antenna is mainly evaluated around the 5.5 GHz WLAN region and provides acceptable impedance matching at the target frequency, with simulated and measured S11 values of approximately −10.90 dB and −10.62 dB at 5.5 GHz, respectively. The gain estimated using the substitution method is approximately 1.30 dBi at 5.5 GHz. The antenna is then extended to a symmetrical two-port MIMO structure using a shared partial ground plane and a central I-shaped defected ground structure for coupling reduction. The MIMO results show S11 below −18 dB around 5.5 GHz and an S12 level close to -10 dB, corresponding to approximately 10 dB inter-port isolation. Under the S-parameter-based diversity evaluation, the maximum ECC is approximately 0.01, while the DG remains close to 10 dB. A 2 × 2 OTA QPSK testbed was implemented by connecting both ports of the transmitting and receiving MIMO prototypes to two independent transmit and two independent receive RF chains, respectively. The measured link-level EVM values were 7.4%, 4.8%, and 6.2% at 5.18, 5.50, and 5.825 GHz, respectively. The results show that the proposed antenna provides a practical balance between compact size, simple fabrication, and acceptable WLAN-band MIMO performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

Göçen, C. (2026). Design, Fabrication, and QPSK-Based Validation of a Compact Two-Port MIMO Antenna with Defected Ground Structure for 5 GHz WLAN Applications. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 5, 2738–2748. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.2000932

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Addepalli, T. (2023). Compact MIMO diversity antenna for 5G sub-6 GHz (N77/N78 and N79) and WLAN (Wi-Fi 5 and Wi-Fi 6) band applications. Wireless Personal Communications, 132(3), 2203–2223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10718-4
  2. Addepalli, T., Kumar, M. S., Jetti, C. R., Gollamudi, N. K., Kumar, B. K., & Kulkarni, J. (2023). Fractal loaded, novel, and compact two- and eight-element high diversity MIMO antenna for 5G sub-6 GHz (N77/N78 and N79) and WLAN applications, verified with TCM analysis. Electronics, 12(4), Article 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12040952
  3. Ali, A., Munir, M. E., Marey, M., Mostafa, H., Zakaria, Z., Al-Gburi, A. J. A., & Bhatti, F. A. (2023). A compact MIMO multiband antenna for 5G/WLAN/Wi-Fi 6 devices. Micromachines, 14(6), Article 1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14061153
  4. Baro, B. K., Deka, S., & Sarmah, K. (2026). Design and implementation of a multiband, tri-port CPW-fed antenna for OFDM-FDD based 5G Internet of Things applications: System level validation. Measurement, 278, Article 121691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2026.121691
  5. Bayarzaya, B., Hussain, N., Awan, W. A., Sufian, M. A., Abbas, A., Choi, D., Lee, J., & Kim, N. (2022). A compact MIMO antenna with improved isolation for ISM, sub-6 GHz, and WLAN application. Micromachines, 13(8), Article 1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13081355
  6. Baytöre, C., Göçen, C., Palandöken, M., Kaya, A., & Zoral, E. Y. (2019). Compact metal-plate slotted WLAN-WiMAX antenna design with USB Wi-Fi adapter application. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 27(6), 4403–4417. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1904-122
  7. Çakmak, T., Murat, C., & Ustabas, I. (2026). Performance comparison of carbon footprint and dielectric properties of geopolymer mortars with Portland cement mortars. Silicon, 18(1), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-025-03538-7
  8. Cheng, S. H., Chen, S. C., Chen, Y. J., & Liu, C. L. (2024). Compact asymmetric T-feed closed-slot antennas for 2.4/5/6 GHz Wi-Fi 7 MIMO laptops. Electronics, 13(13), Article 2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13132430
  9. Göçen, C., Akdag, I., Belen, M. A., Mahouti, P., Kaya, A., & Palandöken, M. (2022). ISM 2.4 GHz band antenna model for RF energy harvesting systems. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (43), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1202107
  10. Güler, C., & Bayer Keskin, S. E. (2023). A novel high-isolation four-port compact MIMO antenna with DGS for 5G applications. Micromachines, 14(7), Article 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14071309
  11. Khushbu, & Prakash, A. (2024). A compact wideband MIMO antenna with efficient isolation for S and C-bands applications. Discover Electronics, 1, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44291-024-00015-0
  12. Liu, X., Zhang, J., Xi, H., Yang, X., Sun, L., & Gan, L. (2022). A compact four-band high-isolation quad-port MIMO antenna for 5G and WLAN applications. AEU–International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 153, Article 154294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2022.154294
  13. Murat, C. (2026). AI-driven optimization of a 2.45 GHz microwave drying system for raw corn: Enhancing efficiency and uniformity via hybrid CNN-RNN control. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 9(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1766754
  14. Murat, C., Kaya, A., & Palandoken, M. (2025). Non-Foster microwave circuit design for wide band active impedance matching operation. AEU–International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 200, Article 155954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2025.155954
  15. Murat, C., Palandoken, M., Kaya, I., & Kaya, A. (2021). A novel ISM band reflector type applicator design for microwave ablation systems. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 40(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2021.1885434
  16. Pannu, P. (2024). Highly compact UWB-MIMO antenna with sharp multi-stop-band characteristics. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2024, Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-024-02369-1
  17. Pradeep, P., Jaya Sankar, K., & Chandra Sekhar, P. (2024). Design of a compact wideband two-port MIMO antenna for NR 5G sub-6 GHz band wireless applications. Wireless Personal Communications, 138(2), 1193–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-11552-y
  18. Saeidi, T., Al-Gburi, A. J. A., & Karamzadeh, S. (2023). A miniaturized full-ground dual-band MIMO spiral button wearable antenna for 5G and sub-6 GHz communications. Sensors, 23(4), Article 1997. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23041997
  19. Sushma Chowdary, P., Panda, S. K., & Naidu, V. P. (2023). Development of asymmetric feed MIMO antenna for Wi-MAX, WIFI applications. Applied Physics A, 129, Article 736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-023-07001-5
  20. Wang, C., Wang, H., Wu, P., & Hou, M. (2022). Dual-band closed-slot MIMO antenna for terminal wireless applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 70(8), 6514–6525. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2022.3161531
  21. You, W., Wang, Z., Nie, W., & Mu, W. (2023). A 12-port MIMO antenna system for 5G/WLAN applications. Micromachines, 14(6), Article 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14061196