SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 5

A Digital Design Framework for Cyborg Architecture

Ayşegül Kıdık(ABDULLAH GUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-1497-2455
Hakan Tong(İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-8964-9989
Pages
2586–2598
Publication Date
2026-09-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The contribution of the study lies not in introducing the cyborg concept into architectural discourse, but in operationalizing it as an explicit five-layer architectural and digital design model with observable indicators and boundary conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper proposes a digital design framework for cyborg architecture as an adaptive, artificial intelligence-mediated and communicative spatial system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Rather than defining cyborg architecture as a stylistic category, a futuristic image, or a simple extension of smart building technologies, the study conceptualizes it as a recursive cybernetic system composed of four operational layers-sensing, cognition, actuation, and material intelligence-framed by governance as a meta-regulatory fifth layer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The contribution of the study lies not in introducing the cyborg concept into architectural discourse, but in operationalizing it as an explicit five-layer architectural and digital design model with observable indicators and boundary conditions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cyborg architecture · Digital design · Artificial intelligence

Abstract

This paper proposes a digital design framework for cyborg architecture as an adaptive, artificial intelligence-mediated and communicative spatial system. Rather than defining cyborg architecture as a stylistic category, a futuristic image, or a simple extension of smart building technologies, the study conceptualizes it as a recursive cybernetic system composed of four operational layers-sensing, cognition, actuation, and material intelligence-framed by governance as a meta-regulatory fifth layer. The research adopts a qualitative theory-building approach based on conceptual analysis and interdisciplinary synthesis. Foundational cybernetic theory, cyborg and posthuman discourse, responsive architecture, smart building research, digital twin studies, critical data studies, and recent literature on artificial intelligence in architectural design are examined to construct the proposed framework. The paper argues that architecture becomes cyborg not through technological accumulation alone, but through the integration of human users, computational processes, responsive materials, spatial feedback, and ethical regulation. In this framework, adaptive space is understood as a communicative environment in which data, algorithms, users, materials, and institutional protocols continuously mediate one another. The contribution of the study lies not in introducing the cyborg concept into architectural discourse, but in operationalizing it as an explicit five-layer architectural and digital design model with observable indicators and boundary conditions.

Özet

This paper proposes a digital design framework for cyborg architecture as an adaptive, artificial intelligence-mediated and communicative spatial system. Rather than defining cyborg architecture as a stylistic category, a futuristic image, or a simple extension of smart building technologies, the study conceptualizes it as a recursive cybernetic system composed of four operational layers-sensing, cognition, actuation, and material intelligence-framed by governance as a meta-regulatory fifth layer. The research adopts a qualitative theory-building approach based on conceptual analysis and interdisciplinary synthesis. Foundational cybernetic theory, cyborg and posthuman discourse, responsive architecture, smart building research, digital twin studies, critical data studies, and recent literature on artificial intelligence in architectural design are examined to construct the proposed framework. The paper argues that architecture becomes cyborg not through technological accumulation alone, but through the integration of human users, computational processes, responsive materials, spatial feedback, and ethical regulation. In this framework, adaptive space is understood as a communicative environment in which data, algorithms, users, materials, and institutional protocols continuously mediate one another. The contribution of the study lies not in introducing the cyborg concept into architectural discourse, but in operationalizing it as an explicit five-layer architectural and digital design model with observable indicators and boundary conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kıdık, A., Tong, H. (2026). A Digital Design Framework for Cyborg Architecture. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 5, 2586–2598. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1995933

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (41)

  1. Aelenei, D., Aelenei, L., & Vieira, C. P. (2016). Adaptive façade: Concept, applications, research questions. Energy Procedia, 91, 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.218
  2. Alisic, R., Molinari, M., Paré, P. E., & Sandberg, H. (2020). Ensuring privacy of occupancy changes in smart buildings. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA) (pp. 871–876). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCTA41146.2020.9206317
  3. Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman & Hall.
  4. Attia, S. (2017). Evaluation of adaptive facades: The case study of Al Bahr Towers in the UAE. QScience Connect, 2017(2), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.5339/connect.2017.qgbc.6
  5. Buckman, A. H., Mayfield, M., & Beck, S. B. M. (2014). What is a smart building? Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 3(2), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-01-2014-0003
  6. Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed., with a new preface). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514
  7. Clynes, M. E., & Kline, N. S. (1960). Cyborgs and space. Astronautics, 5(9), 26–27, 74–76.
  8. Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.
  9. Fox, M., & Kemp, M. (2009). Interactive architecture. Princeton Architectural Press.
  10. Frazer, J. (1995). An evolutionary architecture. Architectural Association Publications.
  11. Gandy, M. (2005). Cyborg urbanization: Complexity and monstrosity in the contemporary city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00568.x
  12. Gilson, L. L., & Goldberg, C. B. (2015). Editors’ comment: So, what is a conceptual paper? Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115576425
  13. Gökşen Takva, F., Çolak Demirel, B. B., & Ayçam, İ. (2025). Integration of artificial intelligence into the architectural design process: Architectural studio experience. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 8(6), 1874–1882. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1761624
  14. Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
  15. Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001
  16. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
  17. Jang, S., Roh, H., & Lee, G. (2025). Generative AI in architectural design: Application, data, and evaluation methods. Automation in Construction, 174, Article 106174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106174
  18. Karanouh, A., & Kerber, E. (2015). Innovations in dynamic architecture. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 3(2), 185–221. https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2015.2.1017
  19. Kerner, M., Gebken, T., Sundarrao, I., Hindersin, S., & Sauss, D. (2019). Development of a control system to cover the demand for heat in a building with algae production in a bioenergy façade. Energy and Buildings, 184, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.030
  20. Kevseroğlu Kurban, Ö., & Kıdık Baran, A. (2026). AI as a design partner: Evaluating its role in architectural education through student and instructor insights. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 9(3), 1139–1149. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1878241
  21. Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473909472
  22. Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001
  23. Kolarevic, B. (Ed.). (2003). Architecture in the digital age: Design and manufacturing. Spon Press.
  24. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
  25. Lee, J. H., Ostwald, M. J., & Kim, M. J. (2021). Characterizing smart environments as interactive and collective platforms: A review of the key behaviors of responsive architecture. Sensors, 21(10), Article 3417. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103417
  26. Loonen, R. C. G. M., Trčka, M., Cóstola, D., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2013). Climate adaptive building shells: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.016
  27. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. The MIT Press.
  28. McCullough, M. (2004). Digital ground: Architecture, pervasive computing, and environmental knowing. The MIT Press.
  29. Mitchell, W. J. (2003). Me++: The cyborg self and the networked city. The MIT Press.
  30. Negroponte, N. (1970). The architecture machine: Toward a more human environment. The MIT Press.
  31. Oxman, N. (2010). Material-based design computation [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. DSpace@MIT. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/59192
  32. Pask, G. (1969). The architectural relevance of cybernetics. Architectural Design, 39(9), 494–496.
  33. Picon, A. (2015). Smart cities: A spatialised intelligence. Wiley.
  34. Sadowski, J. (2020). Too smart: How digital capitalism is extracting data, controlling our lives, and taking over the world. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12240.001.0001
  35. Semeraro, C., Biyrouti, S. J. A., Abdelkareem, M. A., & Olabi, A. G. (2025). Digital twin-driven innovation in smart and green building: A structured review and research agenda. International Journal of Thermofluids, 29, Article 101393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101393
  36. Sinopoli, J. M. (2010). Smart building systems for architects, owners and builders. Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-20023-7
  37. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  38. Stouffer, K., Pease, M., Tang, C., Zimmerman, T., Pillitteri, V., Lightman, S., Hahn, A., Saravia, S., Sherule, A., & Thompson, M. (2023). Guide to operational technology (OT) security (NIST Special Publication 800-82 Rev. 3). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-82r3
  39. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. The Technology Press; John Wiley & Sons.
  40. Wurm, J., & Pauli, M. (2016). SolarLeaf: The world’s first bioreactive façade. Architectural Research Quarterly, 20(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135516000245
  41. Yıldız, D., Turan, İ. H., Demirci, S., Yavuz, A. E., & Gebeş, B. (2026). High-performance IoT monitoring with Redis-backed in-memory storage and containerized CI/CD pipeline. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 9(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1735232