Journals / Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Two Wrongs Against Muhammed Asad

Muhammed Esed’e İki Haksızlık Örneği Esed’in Kur’ân Mesajı ile İlgili ‘İntihal’ ve ‘Çarpıtma’ İddialarının Tutarsızlığı

Pages
25–46
Publication Date
2012-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also demon- strated that all these accusations arose from Öztürk’s unjustified prejudice and his inade- quate research

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Two Wrongs Against Muhammed Asad In one of his articles which has been published in “Marife” journal, Prof.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In Öztürk’s another article, which has been published in “Islamiyat” journal, he claims that in the annotations of the aforemen- tioned work, Esed intentionally altered or falsified numerous phrases and passages be- longing to traditional commentators such as At-Tabari (d. 310/923), Al-Baghawi (d. 516/1122), Az-Zamakhshari (d. 538/1143), Ar-Razi (d. 606/1209), Al-Baydawi (d. 685/1286).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also demon- strated that all these accusations arose from Öztürk’s unjustified prejudice and his inade- quate research
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Muhammed Esed · Mustafa Öztürk · Kur’an Mesajı (The Message of The Qur’an)

Abstract

Two Wrongs Against Muhammed Asad In one of his articles which has been published in “Marife” journal, Prof. Dr. Mustafa Öz- türk asserts that Muhammad Asad’s The Message of Qur’an was plagiarized from The Holy Kur’an, written by Maulana Muhammad Ali. In Öztürk’s another article, which has been published in “Islamiyat” journal, he claims that in the annotations of the aforemen- tioned work, Esed intentionally altered or falsified numerous phrases and passages be- longing to traditional commentators such as At-Tabari (d. 310/923), Al-Baghawi (d. 516/1122), Az-Zamakhshari (d. 538/1143), Ar-Razi (d. 606/1209), Al-Baydawi (d. 685/1286). In this article, Öztürk’s claims against Esed are criticised one by one. It is also demon- strated that all these accusations arose from Öztürk’s unjustified prejudice and his inade- quate research

Özet

Prof. Dr. Mustafa Öztürk “Marife” dergisinde yayınlanan bir makalesinde, Muhammed Esed’in Kur’ân Mesajı adlı eserinin Mevlâna Muhammed Ali’nin The Holy Kur’an adlı eserinden intihal edildiğini iddia etmiştir. “İslâmiyât” dergisinde yayınlanan diğer bir makalesinde ise Esed’in, anılan eserinin dipnotlarında, Taberî (ö. 310/923), Beğavî (ö. 516/1122), Zemahşerî (ö. 538/1143), Râzî (ö. 606/1209), Beydâvî (ö. 685/1286) gibi klasik müfessirlerden yapmış olduğu bazı nakillerde, bu müfessirlere ait birçok ibare ve ifadeyi kimi zaman yanlış naklettiğini, kimi zaman da tahrif ettiğini iddia etmiştir. Bu çalışma; Öztürk’ün Esed aleyhinde her iki makalesinde ileri sürdüğü itham ve iddiaların, peşin kanaatler ve yetersiz incelemeler sonucunda varılan haksız yargılar olduğunun tespiti ve bu konuda serdedilen argümanların tek tek çürütülmesini konu edinmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ZEYVELİ, H. (2012). Two Wrongs Against Muhammed Asad. Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 25–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/146664

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...