SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bingöl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Young Minds’ Anxiety and Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence: A Quantitative Study on PAU Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Students

Genç Zihinlerin Yapay Zekâya İlişkin Kaygıları ve Tutumları: PAÜ İİBF Öğrencileri Üzerine Nicel Bir Araştırma

Yeliz Mohan Bursalı(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5239-8689
Sevcan Demiray(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7535-7659
Sabahat Bayrak Kök(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9118-6327
Pages
73–93
Publication Date
2026-06-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed a significant negative relationship between learning-related anxiety and positive attitudes toward AI, while no significant relationship was found between positive attitudes and AI-related anxieties about job change and restructuring.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between university students’ anxiety about artificial intelligence (AI) and their general attitudes toward this technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 312 undergraduate students at the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Pamukkale University, during the 2024–2025 spring semester using a convenience sampling method and a survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed a significant negative relationship between learning-related anxiety and positive attitudes toward AI, while no significant relationship was found between positive attitudes and AI-related anxieties about job change and restructuring.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2024–2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:yapay zeka kaygısı · yapay zekaya yönelik tutum · üniverite öğrencileri

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between university students’ anxiety about artificial intelligence (AI) and their general attitudes toward this technology. It also explores whether AI-related anxiety and attitudes differ by gender, age, grade level, IT skills, and AI knowledge. Data were collected from 312 undergraduate students at the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Pamukkale University, during the 2024–2025 spring semester using a convenience sampling method and a survey. Results showed a significant negative relationship between learning-related anxiety and positive attitudes toward AI, while no significant relationship was found between positive attitudes and AI-related anxieties about job change and restructuring. However, all three anxiety dimensions—learning, job change, and restructuring—were positively and significantly related to negative attitudes toward AI. Moreover, students’ anxiety and attitudes varied significantly by age, IT skills, and AI knowledge levels.

Özet

Mevcut çalışmanın amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin yapay zekâya ilişkin kaygı düzeyleri ile bu teknolojiye yönelik genel tutumları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Ayrıca öğrencilerin yapay zekâya yönelik kaygı ve tutum düzeylerinin yaş, sınıf düzeyi, bilgi teknolojileri becerileri ve yapay zekâ bilgi seviyelerine göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığı araştırılmıştır. 2024–2025 bahar döneminde Pamukkale Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi’nde öğrenim gören 312 lisans öğrencisinden, kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ve anket tekniği kullanılarak veri toplanmıştır. Bulgular öğrenme kaygısı ile pozitif yapay zekâ tutumu arasında negatif yönlü anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu; iş değiştirme ve yapılandırmaya ilişkin yapay zekâ kaygıları ile pozitif tutum arasında ise anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığını göstermiştir. Öte yandan öğrenme, iş değiştirme ve yapılandırmaya ilişkin yapay zekâ kaygı boyutlarının negatif; yapay zekâ tutumuyla pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı ilişkiler içinde olduğu saptanmıştır. Bunun yanı sıra öğrencilerin kaygı ve tutum düzeylerinin yaş, bilgi teknolojileri beceri düzeyleri ve yapay zekâ bilgi seviyelerine göre anlamlı farklılıklar gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bursalı, Y. M., Demiray, S., Kök, S. B. (2026). Young Minds’ Anxiety and Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence: A Quantitative Study on PAU Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Students. Bingöl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 73–93. https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1720402

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (68)

  1. Aghion, P., Jones, B. F., & Jones, C. I. (2019). Artificial intelligence and economic growth. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans, & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda (pp. 237–282). University of Chicago Press.
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
  3. Akkaya, B., Özkan, A., & Özkan, H. (2021). Yapay zekâ kaygı (YZK) ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 5(2), 1125–1146.
  4. Aksoy, M., & Yalçın, H. (2022). Kamu çalışanlarının yapay zekâ destekli karar sistemlerine yönelik tutumları. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20(2), 85–103.
  5. Al-Smadi, S., Al-Smadi, F., Alzayyat, A., & Al-Shawabkeh, J. D. (2025). The role of AI anxiety and attitudes toward artificial intelligence in shaping healthcare perceptions among Jordanian children. The Open Nursing Journal, 19(1).
  6. Anjila, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence and its future impact in business. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 12(4), 145–150.
  7. Anyanwu, M. N. (2011). The impact of artificial intelligence on contemporary business. International Journal of Computer Applications, 21(4), 17–23.
  8. Araujo, T., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 35, 611–623.
  9. Ayduğ, D., & Altınpulluk, H. (2025). Are Turkish pre-service teachers worried about AI? A study on AI anxiety and digital literacy. AI & Society, 1–12.
  10. Bartlett, M. S. (1951). The effect of standardization on a chi-square approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika, 38(3/4), 337–344.
  11. Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
  12. Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In K. Frankish & W. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence (pp. 316–334). Cambridge University Press.
  13. Brougham, D., & Haar, J. (2018). Employee attitudes towards artificial intelligence: The role of job security and technological competence. Journal of Business Research, 92, 12–21.
  14. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
  15. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. W. W. Norton & Company.
  16. Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Ramaswamy, S., Chui, M., Allas, T., Dahlström, P., Henke, N., & Trench, M. (2017). Artificial intelligence: The next digital frontier. McKinsey Global Institute.
  17. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi.
  18. Cave, S., Coughlan, K., & Dihal, K. (2019). Scary robots: Examining public responses to AI. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 65, 1–40.
  19. Cengiz, S., & Peker, A. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence acceptance and artificial intelligence anxiety among university students: The sequential mediating role of attitudes toward artificial intelligence and literacy. Current Psychology, 44(9), 7991–8000.
  20. Cho, K. A., & Seo, Y. H. (2024). Dual mediating effects of anxiety to use and acceptance attitude of artificial intelligence technology on the relationship between nursing students’ perception of and intention to use them: a descriptive study. BMC nursing, 23(1), 212.
  21. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
  22. Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
  23. Çetiner, N., & Çetinkaya, F. Ö. (2024). Turizm sektöründe yapay zekâ kaygısının motivasyon ve iş tutumları üzerindeki etkisi. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 8(2), 758–775.
  24. Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116.
  25. Erdoğdu, F., & Çakır, R. (2024). Öğretmen adaylarının yapay zekâ kullanımına yönelik kaygı ve tutumlarının incelenmesi. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning (JETOL), 6(1), 14–28.
  26. Eyüp, B., & Kayhan, S. (2023). Pre-service turkish language teachers’ anxiety and attitudes toward artificial intelligence. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 11(4), 43-56.
  27. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
  28. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.
  29. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (10th ed.). Pearson.
  30. Gillespie, N., Lockey, S., Ward, T., Macdade, A., & Hassed, G. (2025). Trust, attitudes and use of artificial intelligence: A global study 2025. The University of Melbourne & KPMG. https://doi.org/10.26188/28822919
  31. Gonzalez, R., & Smith, J. (2025). The influence of AI anxiety and neuroticism in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 210–225.
  32. Gülbahar, Y., & Kalelioğlu, F. (2020). Öğretmen adaylarının yapay zekâ teknolojilerine yönelik algıları. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 10(2), 134–152.
  33. Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5–14.
  34. Hou, Y., Man, Y., Hamilton, M., & Zhang, K. (2025). AI-driven learning tools and student social engagement: A double-edged sword? Computers & Education, 213, 104855.
  35. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415.
  36. Karaoğlu, S., & Coşkun, B. (2021). Üniversite öğrencilerinde yapay zekâ kaygısı: Ölçek geliştirme ve mesleki belirsizlik. Türkiye Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(3), 345–363.
  37. Kaya, F., Aydin, F., Schepman, A., Rodway, P., Okan Yetişensoy, O., & Demir-Kaya, M. (2024). The roles of personality traits, AI anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(2), 497–514.
  38. Kaya, S., & Öztürk, M. (2023). The relationship between artificial intelligence anxiety, neuroticism, and attitudes toward AI. European Journal of Social Development, 15(3), 234–249.
  39. Lee, M., & Kim, H. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence acceptance and artificial intelligence anxiety among university students: The sequential mediating role of attitudes toward artificial intelligence and literacy. Current Psychology, 43(3), 456–470.
  40. Li, J., Yu, H., & Liu, Y. (2021). Ethical awareness and anxiety towards AI technology. Journal of Technology Ethics, 6(1), 34–49.
  41. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
  42. Magoulès, F., & Zhao, H. (2016). Artificial intelligence and big data: The birth of a new intelligence. ISTE Press–Elsevier.
  43. Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming artificial intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46–60.
  44. Nabiyev, V. V. (2012). Yapay zekâ. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  45. Özkan, M., & Kılıç, F. (2022). Otomasyon ve yapay zekâ kaynaklı iş kaybı kaygılarının çalışan performansına etkisi. İşletme ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(4), 205–221.
  46. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag.
  47. Poole, D., Mackworth, A., & Goebel, R. (2023). Computational intelligence: A logical approach (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  48. Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In M. J. Rosenberg, C. I. Hovland, W. J. McGuire, R. P. Abelson, & J. W. Brehm (Eds.), Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (pp. 1–14). Yale University Press.
  49. Rosenfeld, L., & Morville, P. (2020). Understanding public perceptions of artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 138, Article 102412.
  50. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
  51. Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2020). Initial validation of the general attitudes towards artificial intelligence scale. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 1, 100014.
  52. Shin, D. (2021). AI ethics and public anxiety: Implications for acceptance and regulation. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(2), 129–141.
  53. Stănescu, A., & Romașcanu, A. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence anxiety and neuroticism on attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Behavioral Science, 12(1), 45–60.
  54. Syifauddin, M. S., & Yuliansyah, A. R. (2023). The effect of using AI on students' motivation and anxiety in learning English. TransTool–Transformational Language, Literature, and Technology in Learning, 2(2).
  55. Trist, E., & Emery, F. (2018). The social engagement of social science: A Tavistock anthology. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  56. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460.
  57. Ülkü, T., Özcan, S. U., & Polatcı, S. (2025). Yapay zekâ kaygısının gelecek kaygısı ve yenilikçi davranışlar üzerindeki etkisi: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir uygulama. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 12(1), 12–25.
  58. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
  59. Wang, S., Xu, Z., & Li, L. (2020). The relationship between technological self-efficacy and anxiety towards artificial intelligence applications among university students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 140–160.
  60. Wang, Y. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2019). Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: An initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–16.
  61. West, D. M., Allen, J. R., & Gorham, M. (2019). How artificial intelligence is transforming the world. Brookings Institution.
  62. Xie, H., Wang, J., & Chen, L. (2022). What drives students' AI learning behavior: A perspective of AI anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–16.
  63. Yılmaz, B., Demir, E., & Karaoğlan Yılmaz, F. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence acceptance and artificial intelligence anxiety among university students: The sequential mediating role of attitudes toward artificial intelligence and literacy. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07433-7
  64. Yılmaz, E., & Demir, A. (2023). Investigating artificial intelligence anxiety and attitudes among pre service Turkish language teachers. Journal of Educational Technology and Language Studies, 8(2), 120–135.
  65. Yılmaz, H., & Demirtaş, B. (2023). Sağlık çalışanlarının yapay zekâya yönelik etik kaygıları: Nitel bir inceleme. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(1), 88–104.
  66. Yılmaz, M., & Demir, Ö. (2019). Öğrencilerin yapay zekâya yönelik tutumları. Eğitim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 6(2), 90–105.
  67. Zhang, B., & Dafoe, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: American attitudes and trends. Center for the Governance of AI, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford.
  68. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power (pp. 95–105). PublicAffairs.