SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bankacılar / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 102

An Examination of Earnings Quality of Turkish Financial Sector via Earnings Management and Earnings Persistence

Türk Finans Sektörünün Kar Yönetimi ve Karların Süreğenliği Üzerinden Kar Kalitesinin İncelenmesi

MERVE ACAR
Pages
37–62
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results financial sector smoothes income as an earnings management behavior via using loan loss provisions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to investigate earnings quality of Turkish financial sector in terms of earnings management and earnings persistence concepts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Earnings management behavior has been tested under "income smoothing" hypothesis by analyzing loan loss provisions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results financial sector smoothes income as an earnings management behavior via using loan loss provisions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate earnings quality of Turkish financial sector in terms of earnings management and earnings persistence concepts. Earnings management behavior has been tested under "income smoothing" hypothesis by analyzing loan loss provisions. Earnings persistence has been tested for cash flows and accrual components of earnings, as well as discretionary and non-discretionary accruals. According to the results financial sector smoothes income as an earnings management behavior via using loan loss provisions. Besides, it is discretionary accruals which has been used as both earnings management tool and diminishes earnings persistence.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Türk finans sektörünün kar kalitesini kar yönetimi uygulamaları ve kar süreğenliği kapsamında ortaya koymaktır. Bu çerçevede kar yönetimi davranışı "karın istikrarlı gösterilmesi" hipotezi kapsamında finans sektörü tarafından kullanıldığı varsayılan kayıp kredi karşılıkları hesap kalemi ile test edilmiştir. Kar süreğenliği ise karın nakit akışı ve tahakkuk bileşenlerinin yanı sıra ihtiyari ve ihtiyari olmayan tahakkuklar olarak ayrılması ile analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre sektörün kayıp kredi karşılıkları ile karı istikrarlı gösterme yönünde kar yönetimi yaptığı gözlemlenmiştir. Diğer taraftan kar süreğenliğinde bozulmaya neden olan faktörün kar yönetimi aracı olarak kullanılan ihtiyari tahakkuklar olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACAR, M. (2017). An Examination of Earnings Quality of Turkish Financial Sector via Earnings Management and Earnings Persistence. Bankacılar, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 102, 37–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/145975

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ahmed, A. S., Takeda, C.,&Thomas, S.(1999). Bank Loan Loss Provisions: A Reexamination of Capital Management, Earnings Management And Signaling Effects. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(1), 1-25.
  2. Ali, A., M Kabir, H., & Syed Abul, B. (2015). Loan Loss Provisioning In OIC Countries: Evidence From Conventional Vs. Islamic Banks. Cell, 704, 724-6490.
  3. Allen, E. J., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2013).
  4. Accrual Reversals, Earnings And Stock Returns. Journal Of Accounting And Economics, 56(1), 113-129.
  5. Anandarajan, A., Hasan, I., & Lozano-Vivas, A. (2005). Loan Loss Provision Decisions: An Empirical Analysis Of The Spanish Depository Institutions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 14(1), 55-77.
  6. Anandarajan, A., Hasan, I., & Mccarthy, C. (2007). Use of Loan Loss Provisions for Capital, Earnings Management And Signalling By Australian Banks. Accounting & Finance, 47(3), 357-379.
  7. Arya, A., Glover, J. C.,&Sunder, S.(2003). Are Unmanaged Earnings Always Better For Shareholders? Accounting Horizons, 17, 111. Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data: John Wiley & Sons. Bao, B. H., & Bao, D. H. (2004).
  8. Income Smoothing, Earnings Quality And Firm Valuation. Journal Of Business Finance & Accounting, 31(9G10), 1525-1557.
  9. Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H., & Landsman, W. R. (1996). Value-Relevance of Banks' Fair Value Disclosures Under SFAS No. 107 (Digest Summary). Accounting Review, 71(4), 513-537.
  10. BDDK. (2006). Bankalarca Kredilerin ve Diğer Alacakların Niteliklerinin Belirlenmesi ve Bunlar İçin Ayrılacak Karşılıklara İlişkin Usul ve Esaslar Hakkında Yönetmelik. Ankara: Resmi Gazete (26333 Sayılı). Beatty, A., Chamberlain, S. L., & Magliolo, J. (1995). Managing Financial Reports of Commercial Banks: The Influence of Taxes, Regulatory Capital, and Earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 231-261.
  11. Beatty, A., & Liao, S. (2009).
  12. Regulatory Capital Ratios, Loan Loss Provisioning And Procyclicality. Columbus, United States: Ohio State University. Mimeographed Document. Beatty, A. L., Ke, B., & Petroni, K. R. (2002). Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Declines Across Publicly And Privately Held Banks. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 547-570.
  13. Beaver, W., Eger, C., Ryan, S., & Wolfson, M. (1989).
  14. Financial Reporting, Supplemental Disclosures, and Bank Share Prices. Journal of Accounting Research, 157-178.
  15. Beaver, W. H., & Engel, E. E. (1996). Discretionary Behavior With Respect to Allowances for Loan Losses and The Behavior of Security