SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Effects of Beverages on Microhardness of a New Restorative Material Coated with a Surface Sealant

İçeceklerin Yüzey Örtücüsü Uygulanmış Yeni Bir Restoratif Materyalin Mikrosertliği Üzerine Etkileri

Burak Gümüştaş(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY-CERRAHPASA)0000-0002-7538-1763
Sinem Birant(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-3990-7270
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-03-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For clinical decision-making, Cention N is the most suitable material for restorations in patients who are at high risk for erosive conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Many factors in the mouth affect the clinical lifetime of materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In each of the four subgroups: cola, orange juice, sparkling mineral water and distilled water, 10 discs were stored for 5 minutes, three times a day for a week.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For clinical decision-making, Cention N is the most suitable material for restorations in patients who are at high risk for erosive conditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Glass Ionomer · Hardness tests · Food and beverages

Abstract

Objective: Many factors in the mouth affect the clinical lifetime of materials. Acids, enzymes, acidic properties of food and beverages formed in the plaque could change the physicochemical properties of restorative materials. The aim of the study is to examine the effect of acidic beverages on the microhardness of alkasites, and conventional glass ionomers, with changes in surface coating applications. Materials and Methods: Forty specimens in eight mm diameter and two mm thick discs were made with each Cention N and Ionofil U. Half of the specimens were covered with surface sealant. In each of the four subgroups: cola, orange juice, sparkling mineral water and distilled water, 10 discs were stored for 5 minutes, three times a day for a week. Microhardness measurements were made after they were kept in an acidic environment. Results: Acidic beverages significantly reduce the microhardness of restorative materials. The highest microhardness value was observed in the Cention N group with surface sealant. The lowest microhardness value was observed in the Ionofil restorative material group without sealant. Conclusion: The acidic agents tested (cola, orange juice, and sparkling mineral water) have an effect on the reduction of surface microhardness of restorative materials. For clinical decision-making, Cention N is the most suitable material for restorations in patients who are at high risk for erosive conditions.

Özet

Amaç: Ağızdaki birçok faktör, malzemelerin klinik ömrünü etkilemektedir. Asitler, enzimler, plakta oluşan yiyeceklerin ve içeceklerin asidik özellikleri restoratif malzemelerin fizikokimyasal özelliklerini değiştirebilmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, asidik içeceklerin alkasitlerin mikrosertliği ve geleneksel cam iyonomerler üzerindeki etkisini, yüzey örtücü uygulamaları ile değişimlerinin incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Sekiz mm çapında ve iki mm kalınlığında disk şeklindeki kırk örnek Cention N ve Ionofil U ile hazırlandı. Örneklerin yarısı yüzey örtücü ile kaplandı. Kola, portakal suyu, maden suyu ve distile su olmak üzere dört alt grupta her birinde 10 disk olacak şekilde bir hafta boyunca günde üç kez 5 dakika saklandı. Mikro sertlik ölçümleri asidik bir ortamda tutulduktan sonra yapıldı. Bulgular: Asidik içecekler restoratif malzemelerin mikrosertliğini önemli ölçüde azaltmıştır. En yüksek mikrosertlik değeri, yüzey örtücüsü kullanılmış Cention N grubunda gözlenmiştir. En düşük mikrosertlik değeri, yüzey örtücüsü kullanılmayan İononofil U grubunda gözlenmiştir. Sonuç: Test edilen asidik ajanlar (Kola, portakal suyu ve köpüklü mineral suyu) restoratif malzemelerin yüzey mikrosertlikleri üzerinde azaltıcı bir etkiye sahiptir. Klinik kullanım açısından Cention N, eroziv koşullarda yüksek risk altında olan hastalarda restorasyonlar için en uygun materyaldir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gümüştaş, B., Birant, S. (2024). Effects of Beverages on Microhardness of a New Restorative Material Coated with a Surface Sealant. Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1255879

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. Arafa, A., Filfilan, S. S., & Fansa, H. A. (2022). Erosive effect of beverages on surface hardness and ultra-structure of deciduous teeth enamel. Pediatric Dental Journal, 32(3), 186-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdj.2022.08.001
  2. Asmussen, E. (1984). Softening of BISGMA‐based polymers by ethanol and by organic acids of plaque. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 92(3), 257-261. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00889.x
  3. Baig, M. S., & Fleming, G. J. (2015). Conventional glass-ionomer materials: A review of the developments in glass powder, polyacid liquid and the strategies of reinforcement. Journal of Dentistry, 43(8), 897-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.004
  4. Baseren, M. (2004). Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 19(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/088 5328204044011
  5. Culina, M. Z., Rajic, V. B., Salinovic, I., Klaric, E., Markovic, L., & Ivaniševic, A. (2022). Influence of pH cycling on erosive wear and color stability of high-viscosity glass ionomer cements. Materials, 15(3), 923.
  6. Donly, K. J., & Liu, J. A. (2018). Dentin and enamel demineralization inhibition at restoration margins of Vitremer, Z 100 and Cention N. American Journal of Dentistry, 31(3), 166-168.
  7. Faraji, F., Heshmat, H., & Banava, S. (2017). Effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: Nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 20(4), 260. https:// doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_83_16
  8. Fatima, N., Abidi, S. Y. A., & Jat, S. A. (2013). Effectiveness of commonly available surface protecting agents in maintaining microhardness of two cements. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 23(5), 315-319.
  9. Ferracane, J. L. (2006). Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dental Materials, 22(3), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.005
  10. Fousiya, K., Balagopal, V. R., Suresh, K. J., Kumaran, P., Xavier, A. M., & Menon, M. M. (2022). Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Flexural Strength of Self-cured Cention N with Dual-cured Cention N: An In Vitro Study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 15(2), 210-214.
  11. Francisconi, L. F., Honório, H. M., Rios, D., Magalhães, A. C., Machado, M. D. A., & Buzalaf, M. A. R. (2008). Effect of erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials and on enamel restored with these materials. Operative Dentistry, 33(2), 203-208. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-77
  12. Francois, P., Fouquet, V., Attal, J. P., & Dursun, E. (2020). Commercially available fluoride-releasing restorative materials: a review and a proposal for classification. Materials, 13(10), 2313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma131 02313
  13. Gubler, A., Attin, T., Tarle, Z., Tarle, A., Prskalo, K., & Tauböck, T. T. (2022). Effect of adhesive coating on calcium, phosphate, and fluoride release from experimental and commercial remineralizing dental restorative materials. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1-17. | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14544-9
  14. Hamid, D. M. A., Mahmoud, G. M., El-Sharkawy, F. M., & Abou Auf, E. A. (2018). Effect of surface protection, staining beverages and aging on the color stability and hardness of recently introduced uncoated glass ionomer restorative material. Future Dental Journal, 4(2), 288-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2018.05.004
  15. Hamouda, I. M. (2011). Effects of various beverages on hardness, roughness, and solubility of esthetic restorative materials. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 23(5), 315-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00453.x
  16. Hengtrakool, C., Kukiattrakoon, B., & Kedjarune-Leggat, U. (2011). Effect of naturally acidic agents on microhardness and surface micromorphology of restorative materials. European Journal of Dentistry, 5(01), 089-100. https:// doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698863
  17. Ilday, N., Bayindir, Y. Z., & Erdem, V. (2010). Effect of three different acidic beverages on surface characteristics of composite resin restorative materials. Materials Research Innovations, 14(5), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.1179/ 143307510X12820854748917
  18. Khalid, H., Aleesa, N., Grosjean, M., Hill, R., & Wong, F. (2021). Characterisation of a bioactive SiO2-CaO-CaF2-Na2O glass used in composites. Dental Materials, 37(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.017
  19. Kim, H. J. (2022). Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength and Microleakage of Three Ion-Releasing Restorative Materials at Various pH Levels. Applied Sciences, 12(13), 6796. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136796
  20. Mandikos, M. N., McGivney, G. P., Davis, E., Bush, P. J., & Carter, J. M. (2001). A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 85(4), 386-395. https://doi.org/ 10.1067/mpr.2001.114267
  21. Mazzaoui, S. A., Burrow, M. F., & Tyas, M. J. (2000). Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements and resin composites coated with a dentin adhesive. Dental Materials, 16(3), 166-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00003-8
  22. Mohan, M., Shey, Z., Vaidyanathan, J., Vaidyanathan, T. K., Munisamy, S., & Janal, M. (2008). Color changes of restorative materials exposed in vitro to cola beverage. Pediatric Dentistry, 30(4), 309-316.
  23. Parry, J., Shaw, L., Arnaud, M. J., & Smith, A. J. (2001). Investigation of mineral waters and soft drinks in relation to dental erosion. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 28(8), 766-772. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.0079 5.x
  24. Poggio, C., Lombardini, M., Gaviati, S., & Chiesa, M. (2012). Evaluation of Vickers hardness and depth of cure of six composite resins photo-activated with different polymerization modes. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 15(3), 237. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.97946
  25. Prakki, A., Cilli, R., Mondelli, R. F. L., Kalachandra, S., & Pereira, J. C. (2005). Influence of pH environment on polymer based dental material properties. Journal of Dentistry, 33(2), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent. 2004.08.004
  26. Sarkar, N. K. (2000). Internal corrosion in dental composite wear: its significance and simulation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 53(4), 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:4%3C371:: AID-JBM11%3E3.0.CO;2-N
  27. Scaramucci, T., Hara, A. T., Zero, D. T., Ferreira, S. S., Aoki, I. V., & Sobral, M. A. P. (2011). Development of an orange juice surrogate for the study of dental erosion. Brazilian Dental Journal, 22, 473-478. https://doi. org/10.1590/S0103-64402011000600006
  28. Schulze, K. A., Marshall, S. J., Gansky, S. A., & Marshall, G. W. (2003). Color stability and hardness in dental composites after accelerated aging. Dental Materials, 19(7), 612-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03) 00003-4
  29. Scribante, A., Gallo, S., Scarantino, S., Dagna, A., Poggio, C., & Colombo, M. (2020). Exposure of biomimetic composite materials to acidic challenges: Influence on flexural resistance and elastic modulus. Biomimetics, 5, 56.
  30. Shiozawa, M., Takahashi, H., & Iwasaki, N. (2014). Fluoride release and mechanical properties after 1-year water storage of recent restorative glass ionomer cements. Clinical Oral Investigations, 18, 1053-1060. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00784-013-1074-4
  31. Szczesio-Wlodarczyk, A., Sokolowski, J., Kleczewska, J., & Bociong, K. (2020). Ageing of dental composites based on methacrylate resins-A critical review of the causes and method of assessment. Polymers, 12(4), 882. https:// doi.org/10.3390/polym12040882
  32. Tan, B. L., Yap, A. U. J., Ma, H. N. T., Chew, J., & Tan, W. J. (2015). Effect of beverages on color and translucency of new tooth-colored restoratives. Operative Dentistry, 40(2), E56-E65. https://doi.org/10.2341/149027-L
  33. Tanweer, N., Qazi, F. U. R., Das, G., Bilgrami, A., Basha, S., Ahmed, N., et al. (2022). Effect of erosive agents on surface characteristics of nano-fluorapatite ceramic: An In-vitro study. Molecules, 27(15), 4691.
  34. Tedesco, T. K., Calvo, A. F., Yoshioka, L., Fukushima, K. A., Cesar, P. F., & Raggio, D. P. (2018). Does Acid Challenge Affect the Properties and Bond Stability of Restorative Materials on Primary Teeth?. J Adhes Dent, 20(3), 223-31. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad. a40513
  35. West, N. X., Maxwell, A., Hughes, J. A., Parker, D. M., Newcombe, R. G., & Addy, M. (1998). A method to measure clinical erosion: the effect of orange juice consumption on erosion of enamel. Journal of Dentistry, 26(4), 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97) 00025-0
  36. Wongkhantee, S., Patanapiradej, V., Maneenut, C., & Tantbirojn, D. (2006). Effect of acidic food and drinks on surface hardness of enamel, dentine, and tooth-coloured filling materials. Journal of Dentistry, 34(3), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.06.003
  37. Xie, D., Brantley, W. A., Culbertson, B. M., & Wang, G. (2000). Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dental Materials, 16(2), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00093-7
  38. Yap, A. U., Ong, J. E., & Yahya, N. A. (2021). Effect of resin coating on highly viscous glass ionomer cements: a dynamic analysis. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 113, 104120. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104120
  39. Zoergiebel, J., & Ilie, N. (2013). Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: effect of coating, aging and storage agents. Clinical Oral Investigations, 17, 619-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00 784-012-0733-1