Journals / Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Effect of Various Glucose Concentrations on Lactobacillus Species

Farklı Glukoz Konsantrasyonlarının Lactobacillus Türleri Üzerine Etkisi

Pervin Rayaman(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ECZACILIK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-0487-8692
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-02-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Despite the increasing glucose concentrations (2%, 4%, 8%, 16% and 32%), the number of probiotic microorganisms in the present study have not significantly decreased.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The study aimed to determine the effect of various glucose concentrations on Lactobacillus species (Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus isolated from pharmacy preparation, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolated from homemade whey, and standard probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 14917).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Probiotic bacteria were inoculated into De Man-Rogosa-Sharpe Broth (MRSB) media containing 2%, 4%, 8%, 16% and 32% glucose and incubated under aerobic conditions at 37°C for 3 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Despite the increasing glucose concentrations (2%, 4%, 8%, 16% and 32%), the number of probiotic microorganisms in the present study have not significantly decreased.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Glocose · Lacticaseibacillus Rhamnosus · Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to determine the effect of various glucose concentrations on Lactobacillus species (Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus isolated from pharmacy preparation, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolated from homemade whey, and standard probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 14917). Materials and Methods: Probiotic bacteria were inoculated into De Man-Rogosa-Sharpe Broth (MRSB) media containing 2%, 4%, 8%, 16% and 32% glucose and incubated under aerobic conditions at 37°C for 3 days. The number of microorganisms per mL of the sample was determined by counting the number of colonies formed on the surface of the media. Results: L. rhamnosus isolated from pharmacy preparation increased at all glucose concentrations (2%, 4%, 8%, 16%, 32%) and L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 increased at all concentrations until the 55th hour. L. plantarum isolated from homemade whey continued to increase at the glucose concentrations of 2%, 4%, 8% and 32% until the 52nd hour. Similarly, L. plantarum ATCC 14917 strain continued its increase at 2%, 4%, 8% and 32% glucose concentrations until the 52nd hour. Additionally, both L. plantarum strains increased until the 53rd hour and then decreased at the 16% glucose concentration. Conclusion: Despite the increasing glucose concentrations (2%, 4%, 8%, 16% and 32%), the number of probiotic microorganisms in the present study have not significantly decreased.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, farklı glukoz konsantrasyonlarının çeşitli Lactobacillus türleri (eczane preparatından izole edilen Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, ev yapımı peynir altı suyundan izole edilen Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ve standart probiyotik bakteriler Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 ve Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 14917) üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeyi amaçlamıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Probiyotik bakteriler, %2, %4, %8, %16 ve %32 glikoz içeren De Man-Rogosa-Sharpe Broth (MRSB) besiyerine ekilmiş ve 37°C'de 3 gün boyunca aerobik koşullarda inkübe edilmiştir. Numunenin mililitre başına mikroorganizma sayısı, besiyerinin yüzeyinde oluşan koloni sayısı sayılarak belirlenmiştir. Bulgular: Eczane preparatından izole edilen L. rhamnosus tüm glikoz konsantrasyonlarında (%2, %4, %8, %16, %32) artış gösterirken, L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 55. saate kadar tüm konsantrasyonlarda artış gösterdi. Ev yapımı peynir altı suyundan izole edilen L. plantarum, 52. saate kadar %2, %4, %8 ve %32 glikoz konsantrasyonlarında artmaya devam etti. Benzer şekilde, L. plantarum ATCC 14917 suşu da 52. saate kadar %2, %4, %8 ve %32 glikoz konsantrasyonlarında artmaya devam etti. Ek olarak, her iki L. plantarum suşu da 53. saate kadar artış göstermiş, ardından %16 glikoz konsantrasyonunda azalmıştır. Sonuç: Glukoz konsantrasyonundaki artışa rağmen bu çalışmada yer alan probiyotik mikroorganizmaların sayısında önemli bir azalma gözlemlenmemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Rayaman, P., Turgan, R. E. (2026). Effect of Various Glucose Concentrations on Lactobacillus Species. Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 15 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1758229

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Altuntaş, Y., & Batman, A. (2017). Microbiota and metabolic syndrome. Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi, 45(3), 286–296. http://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2016.72461
  2. Champagne, C. P., Raymond, Y., & Tompkins, T. A. (2010). The determination of viable counts in probiotic cultures microencapsulated by spray-coating. Food Microbiology, 27(8), 1104–1111. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.07.017
  3. Champagne, C. P., Ross, R. P., Saarela, M., Hansen, K. F., & Charalampopoulos, D. (2011). Recommendations for the viability assessment of probiotics as concentrated cultures and in food matrices. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 149(3), 185–193. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.07.005
  4. Clemente-Suárez, V. J., Beltrán-Velasco, A. I., Redondo-Flórez, L., Martín-Rodríguez, A., & Tornero-Aguilera, J. F. (2023). Global impacts of Western diet and its effects on metabolism and health: A narrative review. Nutrients, 15(12), 2749. http://doi.org/10.3390/nu15122749
  5. Corcoran, B. M., Stanton, C., Fitzgerald, G. F., & Ross, R. P. (2005). Survival of probiotic lactobacilli in acidic environments is enhanced in the presence of metabolizable sugars. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71(6), 3060–3067. http://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.6.3060-3067.2005
  6. Das, T. K., Pradhan, S., Chakrabarti, S., Mondal, K. C., & Ghosh, K. (2022). Current status of probiotic and related health benefits. Applied Food Research, 2(2), 100185. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2022.100185
  7. De Marco, P., Henriques, A. C., Azevedo, R., Sá, S. I., Cardoso, A., Fonseca, B., … Leal, S. (2021). Gut microbiome composition and metabolic status are differently affected by early exposure to unhealthy diets in a rat model. Nutrients, 13(9), 3236. http://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093236
  8. Do, M. H., Lee, E., Oh, M.-J., Kim, Y., & Park, H.-Y. (2018). High-glucose or -fructose diet cause changes of the gut Microbiota and metabolic disorders in mice without body weight change. Nutrients, 10(6), 761. http://doi.org/10.3390/nu10060761
  9. Doğan, M. (2011). Probiyotik bakterilerin etki mekanizması. Anadolu Bil Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, (21), 98-102. https://izlik.org/JA82JM32SW European Pharmacopoeia, 2019. “Microbiological examination of non-sterile products, microbial enumeration tests”. European Pharmacopoeia. Council of Europe. Strasbourg Cedex, France.
  10. Fontana, L., Bermudez-Brito, M., Plaza-Diaz, J., Muñoz-Quezada, S., & Gil, A. (2013). Sources, isolation, characterisation and evaluation of probiotics. The British Journal of Nutrition, 109 Suppl 2(S2), S35-50. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512004011
  11. Francis, H., & Stevenson, R. (2013). The longer-term impacts of Western diet on human cognition and the brain. Appetite, 63, 119–128. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.12.018
  12. Harrigan, W. F., & Mccance, M. E. (1966). Laboratory methods in microbiology (pp. 8–65.) New York: Academic Press;
  13. Hedeskov, C. J. (1980). Mechanism of glucose-induced insulin secretion. Physiological reviews, 60(2), 442-509. http://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1980.60.2.442
  14. İşgören, A., & Sungur, S. (2019). Tatlandırıcılar. Lectio Scientific, 3(1), 19-33. https://izlik.org/JA42DC33RT
  15. Jorgensen, J.H., Pfaller, M.A., Carroll, K.C. & Funke, G. (2015) Manual of Clinical Microbiology ( 11th ed., pp. 15-28) Washington, DC: ASM Press
  16. Karpuz, E. (2020) Bazı bitki ekstreleri ile saf fenolik bileşiklerin probiyotik ve patojen mikroorganizmaların biyofilm gelişimi üzerine etkisi. Yayımlanmış yüksek lisans tezi. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  17. Lata, P., & Savitri. (2023). Probiotics and human health. Research Journal of Biotechnology, 18(7), 173–180. http://doi.org/10.25303/1807rjbt1730180
  18. Reuter, S., & Mrowka, R. (2019). Obesity, adipocytes and insulin resistance—Friends for life? Acta Physiologica (Oxford, England), 225(3), e13258. http://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13258
  19. Sanders, M. E., Merenstein, D., Merrifield, C. A., & Hutkins, R. (2018). Probiotics for human use. Nutrition Bulletin, 43(3), 212–225. http://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12334
  20. Sohrabvandi, S., Mortazavian, A. M., Dolatkhahnejad, M. R., & Monfared, A. B. (2012). Suitability of MRS-bile agar for the selective enumeration of mixed probiotic bacteria in presence of mesophilic lactic acid cultures and yoghurt bacteria. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology, 10(1), 16-21.
  21. Statovci, D., Aguilera, M., MacSharry, J., & Melgar, S. (2017). The impact of western diet and nutrients on the Microbiota and immune response at mucosal interfaces. Frontiers in Immunology, 8, 838. http://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00838
  22. Tenea, G. N., Gonzalez, G. L., & Moreno, J. L. (2022). Probiotic Characteristics and Antimicrobial Potential of a Native Bacillus subtilis Strain Fa17.2 Rescued from Wild Bromelia sp. Flowers. Microorganisms, 10(5), 860. http://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050860
  23. Teti̇k, N., Rayaman, P., Rayaman, E., & Adaleti̇, R. (2023). Antimicrobial effect of probiotic microorganisms on clinical and standard Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Journal of Research in Pharmacy, 27(6), 2374–2388. https://izlik.org/JA37YU43UX
  24. Tian, Y., Gou, W., Ma, Y., Shuai, M., Liang, X., Fu, Y., & Zheng, J.-S. (2023). The short-term variation of human gut mycobiome in response to dietary intervention of different macronutrient distributions. Nutrients, 15(9), 2152. http://doi.org/10.3390/nu15092152
  25. Tsifintaris, M., Kiousi, D. E., Repanas, P., Kamarinou, C. S., Kavakiotis, I., & Galanis, A. (2024). Probio-ichnos: A database of microorganisms with in vitro probiotic properties. Microorganisms, 12(10), 1955. http://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12101955
  26. Tunalı Y. Farmasötik mikrobiyoloji uygulamaları. 2nd ed. Istanbul, Turkey: Star Ajans Ltd. Şti; 2014.
  27. Önay, D. (2007). Probiyotikler. Academic Food Journal, 4(6), 17-18. https://izlik.org/JA95SM93EL
  28. Özduran, E. (2023) Lactobacıllus plantarum suşlarının inaktive edilmiş ve edilmemiş formlarının antioksidan, antimikrobiyal ve antibiyofilm etkilerinin karşılaştırılması. Yayımlanmış yüksek lisans tezi. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul