Journals / Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 3

Peer Bullying And Empathy In Middle School Students: A Cross-Sectional Study

Türkan Akyol Güner(ZONGULDAK BÜLENT ECEVİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0138-0669
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-08
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

School-based prevention programs should prioritize these contextual factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To examine the relationship between peer bullying and empathy among middle school students in the context of violence exposure and sociodemographic variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 310 students (159 girls, 151 boys; age range: 10–14 years) from a state middle school in northwestern Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:School-based prevention programs should prioritize these contextual factors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Peer bullying · Empathy · Middle school students

Abstract

Objective: To examine the relationship between peer bullying and empathy among middle school students in the context of violence exposure and sociodemographic variables. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 310 students (159 girls, 151 boys; age range: 10–14 years) from a state middle school in northwestern Turkey. Data were collected using a Sociodemographic Information Form, the Empathy Level Determination Scale (ELDS), and the Peer Bullying Scale (PBS). Independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression were used. Results: A low-level significant positive correlation was found between empathy and bullying (r=0.211, p<0.001). Girls showed significantly higher empathy than boys (p<0.001); no gender difference in bullying was found (p=0.441). Parental education was positively associated with empathy. Violence exposure was the strongest predictor of bullying (victimization: η²=0.140, d=1.40; witnessing: η²=0.119, d=0.74). Fewer close friends was associated with higher bullying scores (F(6,303)=3.050, p=0.007). Empathy explained only 4.5% of bullying variance (R²=0.045). Conclusion: Violence exposure and peer support networks are primary determinants of bullying; empathy alone is insufficient. School-based prevention programs should prioritize these contextual factors.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güner, T. A. (2026). Peer Bullying And Empathy In Middle School Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 15 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1977709

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Baldry, A. C. (2003). Bullying in schools and exposure to domestic violence. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27(7), 713–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(03)00114-5
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
  3. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
  4. Bjärehed, M., Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., & Gini, G. (2020). Mechanisms of moral disengagement and their associations with indirect bullying, direct bullying, and pro-aggressive bystander behavior. Journal of Early Adolescence, 40(1), 28–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618824745
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
  6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
  7. Demir, K., & Küçük, S. (2025). Effectiveness of a theory-based peer bullying counseling program on cognition, empathy, friendship, and anger control: A quasi-experimental study among middle school students. Journal of School Nursing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405251396151
  8. Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents' bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33(5), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20204
  9. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32(6), 540–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20154
  10. Kaya, B., & Çolakoğlu, Ö. M. (2015). Adaptation study of the empathy level determination scale. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 16(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.17679/iuefd.16127895
  11. Kutlu, F. (2005). Examination of peer bullying in terms of various variables [Master's thesis]. Ankara University.
  12. Kutlu, F., & Aydın, G. (2010). Preliminary study for peer bullying scale development. Turkish Psychological Writings, 13(25), 1–12.
  13. Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34(5), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291703001624
  14. Mateus Francisco, S., Costa Ferreira, P., Veiga Simão, A. M., & Salgado Pereira, N. (2024). Moral disengagement and empathy in cyberbullying: How they are related in reflection activities about a serious game. BMC Psychology, 12, 168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01582-3
  15. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Country notes – Türkiye. OECD Publishing.
  16. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell Publishing. Paz, Y., Davidov, M., Orlitsky, T., Roth-Hanania, R., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2022). Developmental trajectories of empathic concern in infancy and their links to social competence in early childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(7), 762–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13516
  17. Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151002166442
  18. Pinchak, N. P. (2024). A paradox of school social organization: Positive school climate, friendship network density, and adolescent violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53(11), 2547–2566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-024-02034-2
  19. Raine, A., & Chen, F. R. (2018). The Cognitive, Affective, and Somatic Empathy Scales (CASES) for children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 47(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1295383 Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
  20. Smith, P. K. (2019). Bullying: Insights and perspectives. Routledge.
  21. Türkan Aydın, B., Peker, A., Keleş, O., & Cengiz, S. (2023). Examining the relationships between peer bullying, empathic tendency, and tolerance in adolescents. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.31463/aicusbed.1344065
  22. Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
  23. Zych, I., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Empathy and callous-unemotional traits in different bullying roles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 20(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016683456