Journals / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction, and Potential Complications after Blepharoplasty

Pages
91–95
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A comprehensive preoperative assessment, and combining surgeries when necessary and appropriate, ensures a high rate of success in blepharoplasty procedures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study is an evaluation of the surgical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and potential complications following blepharoplasty surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 128 patients who underwent blepharoplasty surgery between 2015 and 2017 were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A comprehensive preoperative assessment, and combining surgeries when necessary and appropriate, ensures a high rate of success in blepharoplasty procedures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study is an evaluation of the surgical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and potential complications following blepharoplasty surgery. Methods: A total of 128 patients who underwent blepharoplasty surgery between 2015 and 2017 were included in this study. A postoperative lid crease difference of at least 1 mm was considered asymmetrical. Pre- and postoperative tear break-up time (TBUT) was evaluated. All of the patients were asked to complete a satisfaction assessment form prepared by the authors. The scar tissue that developed along the incision line was evaluated and graded by a single observer. Results: The mean age of the patients was 62.70±9.73 years, and all of the patients were monitored for a period of least 6 months. In combination with blepharoplasty, 17 patients underwent eyebrow surgery, 6 underwent lower eyelid surgery, and 4 underwent levator surgery. Lid crease asymmetry of 1 mm was determined in 8 patients, and a 2-mm asymmetry was identified in 2 patients, although the pre- and postoperative TBUT was not significantly different (p≥0.05). A total of 107 (83.59%) patients reported a very high level of satisfaction at the postoperative sixth month, 15 (11.71%) patients reported a high level of satisfactıon, and 6 (4.68%) reported a moderate level of satisfaction. In the postoperative sixth month, 87 (67.97%) patients had no scar tissue at the incision line, while 36 (28.13%) patients had noticeable scar tissue upon close inspection, and 5 (3.91%) patients had apparent scar tissue. None of the patients developed serious complications, such as severe hematoma, lagophthalmos, or wound separation. Conclusion: In the present study, the patients generally expressed long-term satisfaction with the results of blepharoplasty surgery for dermatochalasis. A comprehensive preoperative assessment, and combining surgeries when necessary and appropriate, ensures a high rate of success in blepharoplasty procedures.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKAYA, S. (2018). Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction, and Potential Complications after Blepharoplasty. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 91–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/145786

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Lee JW, Baker SR. Esthetic enhancements in upper blepharoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2013:40;139–46. [CrossRef] Yang P, Ko AC, Kikkawa DO, Korn BS. Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Evaluation, Treatment, and Complication Minimization. World J Plast Surg 2016;5:58–61.
  2. Hassanpour SE, Khajouei Kermani H. Brow Ptosis after Upper Blepharoplasty: Findings in 70 Patients. Semin Plast Surg 2017;31:51–7.
  3. Leatherbarrow B, Saha K. Complications of Blepharoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2013;29:281–8. [CrossRef] Hamawy AH, Farkas JP, Fagien S, Rohrich RJ. Preventing and managing dry eyes after periorbital surgery: a retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:353–3. [CrossRef] Floegel I, Horworth-Winter J, Mueller K, Haller-Schober EM. A conservative blepharoplasty may be a means of alleviating dry eye symptoms. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003;81:230–2.
  4. Witney S, Witherow H, Waterhouse. One hundred cases of endoscopic brow lift. Br J Plast Surg 2002;55:20–4. [CrossRef] Jones BM, Grover R. Endoscopic brow lift: a personal review of 538 patients and comparison of fixation tecniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1242-50. [CrossRef] Saadat D, Dresner SC. Safety of blepharoplasty in patients with preoperative dry eyes. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:101–4.
  5. Sheu MC, Schoenfield L, Jeng BH. Development of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis after upper eyelid blepharoplasty surgery: support for the mechanical theory of its pathogenesis. Cornea 2007; 26:490–2. [CrossRef] Hass AN, Penne RB, Stefanyszyn MA, Flanagan JC. Incidence of postblepharoplasty orbital hemorrhage and associated visual loss. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;20:426–32. [CrossRef] Patrocinio TG, Loredo BA, Arevalo CE, Patrocinio LG, Patrocinio JA. Complications in blepharoplasty: how to avoid and manage them. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2011;77:322–7. [CrossRef] Prischmann J, Sufyan A, Ting JY, Ruffin C, Perkins SW. Dry eye symptoms and chemosis following blepharoplasty: a 10-year retrospective review of 892 cases in a single-surgeon series. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013;15:39–46. [CrossRef] Korn BS, Kikkawa DO, Schanzlin DJ. Blepharoplasty in the postlaser in situ keratomileusis patient: preoperative considerations to avoid dry eye syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:2232– 9. [CrossRef] Schulz CB, Nicholson R, Penwarden A, Parkin B. Anterior approach white line advancement: technique and long-term outcomes in the correction of blepharoptosis. Eye (Lond) 2017;31:1716–23. [CrossRef] Leclère FM, Alcolea J, Mordon S, Servel