SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 2

Our Results of Transcanalicular Multidiode Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy With and Without Silicon Tube Intubation

Sezen AKKAYA
Pages
93–97
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion and Conclusion: Transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy surgery with bicanalicular silicon tube intubation was more successful than that without bicanalicular silicon tube intubation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: To compare surgical outcomes with and without bicanalicular silicon tube intubation for the treatment of patients with primary uncomplicated nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study included 61 patients with uncomplicated primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction, who were divided into two groups: Group 1 underwent transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy surgery with bicanalicular silicon tube intubation and Group 2 underwent transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy surgery without bicanalicular silicon tube intubation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion and Conclusion: Transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy surgery with bicanalicular silicon tube intubation was more successful than that without bicanalicular silicon tube intubation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: To compare surgical outcomes with and without bicanalicular silicon tube intubation for the treatment of patients with primary uncomplicated nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Methods: This retrospective study included 61 patients with uncomplicated primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction, who were divided into two groups: Group 1 underwent transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy surgery with bicanalicular silicon tube intubation and Group 2 underwent transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy surgery without bicanalicular silicon tube intubation. The mean follow-up periods were 13±0.6 months for Group 1 and 13±0.6 months for Group 2. Results: Success was defined as irrigation of the lacrimal system without regurgitation and the absence of epiphora. Success rates were 80.0% (24/30) for Group 1 and 64.5% (20/31) for Group 2 in the first year after operation. A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (p=0.03). Discussion and Conclusion: Transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy surgery with bicanalicular silicon tube intubation was more successful than that without bicanalicular silicon tube intubation.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKAYA, S. (2018). Our Results of Transcanalicular Multidiode Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy With and Without Silicon Tube Intubation. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 2, 93–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/197344

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Woog JJ. The incidence of symptomatic acquired lacrimal outflow obstruction among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976-2000 (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2007;105:649–66
  2. Olcina Ll. Dacriocistitis. Annals d’Oftalmologia 2007;15:192–8
  3. Jonathan J, Yanoff M, Duker SJ. The lacrimal drainage system. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, editors. Ophthalmology. 2nd ed. St. Lois: Mosby; 2004. p. 171–8
  4. Miranda Anta S, Blanco Mateos G, Valverde Collar C. Dacryocystorhinostomy in adolescents and young adults [Article in Turkish]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2011;86:243–6. [CrossRef ] 5. Lee S, Yen MT. Laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy: a viable treatment option? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2011;22:413–8
  5. Toti A. Nuovo metodo conservatore di cura radicale delle suporazioni croniche del sacco lacrimale. Clin Med Firenze 1904;10:385–9
  6. Massaro BM, Gonnering RS, Harris GJ. Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. A new approach to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:1172–6. [CrossRef ] 8. Gonnering RS, Lyon DB, Fisher JC. Endoscopic laser-assisted lacrimal surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;111:152–7. [CrossRef ] 9. Woog JJ, Metson R, Puliafito CA. Holmium: YAG endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;116:1– 10. [CrossRef ] 10. Luomanen M, Rauhamaa-Mäkinen R, Meurman JH, Kosloff T, Tiitta O. Healing of rat mouth mucosa after irradiation with CO2, Nd:YAG, and CO2-Nd:YAG combination lasers. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102:223–8. [CrossRef ] 11. Eloy P, Trussart C, Jouzdani E, Collet S, Rombaux P, Bertrand B. Transcanalicular diode laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 2000;54:157–63
  7. Al-Asadi SZ, Al-Abbasi AM. Efficacy of diode laser transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy in acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences, 2011;9:152– 4
  8. Ari S, Kürşat Cingü A, Sahin A, Gün R, Kiniş V, Caça I. Outcomes of revision external dacryocystorhinostomy and nasal intubation by bicanalicular silicone tubing under endonasal endoscopic guidance. Int J Ophthalmol 2012;5:238–41
  9. Bardak H, Ekim MM, Daldal H. Endoscopic Transcanalicular Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy in Primary Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction [Article in Turkish]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol 2015;24:157–62. [CrossRef ] 15. Ayintap E, Buttanri IB, Sadıgov F, Serin D, Ozsutcu M, Umurhan Akkan JC, et al. Analysis of age as a possible prognostic factor for transcanalicular multidiode laser dac