SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 3 Issue: 2

COVID-19 pandemic and the quality of couples’ sexual relationships

Pervin Karlı(Amasya Univercity Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Research and Trainig Hospital Gynecology and Obstetric Clinic Kirazlıdere Neigh.Terminal Street Amasya /Turkey)0000-0003-4907-5890
Tuğba Gürbüz(Medistate Hospital, Gynecology and Obstetric Clinic ,Istanbul/Turkey)0000-0003-3555-3767
Metin Şentürk(Amasya Univercity Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Research and Trainig Hospital Gynecology and Obstetric Clinic Kirazlıdere Neigh.Terminal Street Amasya)0000-0002-0385-4381
Pages
—
Publication Date
2021-04-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since the cut-off value for female sexual dysfunction is 26.0, it can be concluded that, on average, participants had poor function and quality of sexual intercourse in the previous four weeks during the lockdown.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: COVI-19 pandemic causes stress between individuals, and this stress can affect the quality of couples’ sexual relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to examine the quality of women’s sexual life during the COVID-19 pandemic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since the cut-off value for female sexual dysfunction is 26.0, it can be concluded that, on average, participants had poor function and quality of sexual intercourse in the previous four weeks during the lockdown.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Covid-19 · FFSI · Sexual Quality of Life

Abstract

Aim: COVI-19 pandemic causes stress between individuals, and this stress can affect the quality of couples’ sexual relationships. This study aimed to examine the quality of women’s sexual life during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at May-June 2020. 235 sexually active women aged 18 to 51 years participated in this study. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was used to examine women’s sexuality from six different perspectives: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. Due to quarantine restrictions, questionnaires were emailed to participants. Results: The participants’ age range was 18 to 51, with an average of 29.6 ± 6.08 years. The total FSFI score with a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 26.75 had an average of 18.12 ± 6.23. Since the cut-off value for female sexual dysfunction is 26.0, it can be concluded that, on average, participants had poor function and quality of sexual intercourse in the previous four weeks during the lockdown. The values of the FSFI score were significantly different according to the age of the woman (p-value = 0.003), the age of the man (p-value = 0.005), and months of marriage (p-value = 0.006). The woman’s age (Sig. = 0.008), the man’s age (Sig. = 0.004), and the month of marriage (Sig. = 0.02) had a significant and negative correlation with the total FSFI score. Conclusion: This study showed that the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown reduced women’s sex life quality. Our results also show that the older women and men are, the lower their sexual satisfaction will be, which may be due to the higher risk of COVID-19 for the elderly.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karlı, P., Gürbüz, T., Şentürk, M. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic and the quality of couples’ sexual relationships. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 3 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.848051

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Ge H, Wang X, Yuan X, et al. The epidemiology and clinical information about COVID-19. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2020: 1.
  2. Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ, Hsueh PR. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and corona virus disease-2019 (COVID-19): the epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020: 105924.
  3. Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, et al. The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: estimation and application. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172: 577-82.
  4. Li G, Tang D, Song B, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on partner relationships and sexual and reproductive health: cross-sectional, online survey study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e20961.
  5. Pedrozo-Pupo JC, Pedrozo-Cortés MJ, Campo-Arias A. Perceived stress associated with COVID-19 epidemic in Colombia: an online survey. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2020; 36: e00090520.
  6. Ventriglio A, Bhugra D. Sexuality in the 21st century: Sexual fluidity. East Asian Arch Psychiatry 2019; 29: 30.
  7. Karli P, Kara OF. Is tubal ligation effective on sexual dysfunction? Medical Science and Discovery 2019; 5: 180-4.
  8. Chen CH, Lin YC, Chiu LH, et al. Female sexual dysfunction: Definition, classification, and debates. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 52: 3-7.
  9. Anastasiadis AG, Davis AR, Ghafar MA, Burchardt M, Shabsigh R. The epidemiology and definition of female sexual disorders. World J Urol 2002; 20: 74-8.
  10. Geiss I, Umek W, Dungl A, Sam C, Riss P, Hanzal E. Prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in gynecologic and urogynecologic patients according to the international consensus classification. Urology 2003; 62: 514-8.
  11. Raina R, Pahlajani G, Khan S, Gupta S, Agarwal A, Zippe CD. Female sexual dysfunction: classification, pathophysiology, and management. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 1273-84.
  12. Stephenson KR, Toorabally N, Lyons L, M. Meston C. Further validation of the Female Sexual Function Index: specificity and associations with clinical interview data. J Sex Marital Ther 2016; 42: 448-61.
  13. Meston CM, Freihart BK, Handy AB, Kilimnik CD, Rosen RC. Scoring and Interpretation of the FSFI: What can be Learned From 20 Years of use? J Sex Med 2020; 17: 17-25.
  14. Meston CM, Kilimnik CD, Freihart BK, Buss DM. Why Humans Have Sex: Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Short-Form Version of the YSEX? Instrument. J Sex Marital Ther 2020; 46: 141-59.
  15. Yuksel B, Ozgor F. Effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic on female sexual behavior. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2020.
  16. Dashraath P, Jeslyn WJL, Karen LMX, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020.
  17. Hall KS, Kusunoki Y, Gatny H, Barber J. Stress symptoms and frequency of sexual intercourse among young women. J Sex Med 2014; 11: 1982-90.
  18. Liu S, Han J, Xiao D, Ma C, Chen B. A report on the reproductive health of women after the massive 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2010; 108: 161-4.
  19. Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 1679-81.
  20. Lee HH, Lee PR, Kao WT, Lee YL. The relationship between sex life satisfaction and job stress of married nurses. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5: 445.
  21. Micelli E, Cito G, Cocci A, et al. Desire for parenthood at the time of COVID-19 pandemic: an insight into the Italian situation. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2020: 1-8.
  22. Rowland DL, Kolba TN. Relationship of specific sexual activities to orgasmic latency, pleasure, and difficulty during partnered sex. J Sex Med 2019; 16: 559-68.
  23. Stavdal MN, Skjævestad MLL, Dahl B. First-time parents’ experiences of proximity and intimacy after childbirth–A qualitative study. Sex Reprod Healthc 2019; 20: 66-71.
  24. Zhang H, Liu T, Zhou Z, et al. miR-137 affects vaginal lubrication in female sexual dysfunction by targeting aquaporin-2. Sex Med 2018; 6: 339-47.