SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2025 / Volume: 7 Issue: 6

Analysis of mid-term radiological and functional results of conservative versus surgical intervention in non-displaced and minimally displaced scaphoid fractures

Nondeplase veya minimal deplase skafoid kırıklarında konservatif ve cerrahi müdahalelerin orta vadeli radyolojik ve fonksiyonel sonuçlarının analizi

Eralp Erdoğan(Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi)0000-0002-4292-3837
Zafer Güneş(Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi)0000-0001-7501-0180
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-10-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Surgical intervention may be useful for young, energetic persons who require quick mobilization, but conservative therapy is a viable and cost-effective option for compliant patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: In patients with non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures (Herbert and Fisher types A1-2, B1-3), we compared radiographic union time, functional outcomes, complication rates, and time to return to work between conservative treatment and percutaneous screw fixation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: From 2013 to 2023, a study examined patients aged 18 to 65 who had recently undergone treatment at one large hospital for non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Surgical intervention may be useful for young, energetic persons who require quick mobilization, but conservative therapy is a viable and cost-effective option for compliant patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Scaphoid fractures · percutaneous fixation · herbert and fisher classification

Abstract

Aims: In patients with non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures (Herbert and Fisher types A1-2, B1-3), we compared radiographic union time, functional outcomes, complication rates, and time to return to work between conservative treatment and percutaneous screw fixation. Methods: From 2013 to 2023, a study examined patients aged 18 to 65 who had recently undergone treatment at one large hospital for non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures. Patients were divided into conservative and surgical (percutaneous fixation with headless compression screw) groups. The study looked at clinical and radiographic outcomes including as range of motion (ROM), grip strength, radiographic union, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Q-DASH) scores, scaphotrapezoid arthritis, complication rates, and return-to-work time. The statistical significance level was set at p<0.05. Results: A total of 107 patients (average age 34.87 years; 58.9% male) were included, with a mean follow-up time of 15.8 months. The surgical group had significantly shorter radiographic union and return-to-work durations (p<0.05). ROM and grip strength were higher in the surgery group, though not statistically significant. The surgical group had considerably decreased Q-DASH and VAS scores three and six months after surgery, but not twelve months. There were no significant variations in rates of delayed union, nonunion, malunion, or scaphotrapezoid arthritis across the groups. Conclusion: Both treatment methods improved union rates in non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures. Percutaneous fixation has been linked to faster fracture healing, quicker return to work, and improved early function. Functional outcomes remained similar one year later. Surgical intervention may be useful for young, energetic persons who require quick mobilization, but conservative therapy is a viable and cost-effective option for compliant patients.

Özet

Amaç: Nondeplase veya minimal displase skafoid kırığı (Herbert ve Fisher tip A1–2, B1–3) olan hastalarda konservatif tedavi ile perkütan vida fiksasyonu yöntemlerinin radyografik kaynama süresi, fonksiyonel sonuçları, komplikasyon oranları ve işe dönüş süreleri açısından karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, 2013–2023 yılları arasında büyük bir hastanede nondeplase veya minimal deplase skafoid kırığı nedeniyle tedavi edilen 18–65 yaş arası hastalar incelendi. Hastalar konservatif tedavi veya cerrahi (Acutrak başsız kompresyon vidası ile perkütan fiksasyon) gruplarına ayrıldı. Klinik ve radyografik sonuçlar; hareket açıklığı (ROM), el kavrama gücü, radyografik kaynama süresi, Görsel Analog Skala (VAS), Q-DASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) skorları, ST artriti, komplikasyon oranları ve işe dönüş süresi gibi parametrelerle değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel anlamlılık sınırı p < 0.05 olarak belirlendi. Bulgular: Toplamda 107 hasta (ortalama yaş 34.87 yıl; %58.9 erkek) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Ortalama takip süresi 15.8 aydı. Cerrahi grupta radyografik kaynama süresi ve işe dönüş süresi anlamlı derecede daha kısaydı (p < 0.05). Hareket açıklığı ve kavrama gücü cerrahi grupta daha yüksek olmakla birlikte istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi. Q-DASH ve VAS skorları cerrahi grupta 3. ve 6. aylarda anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü, ancak 12. ayda gruplar arasında fark yoktu. Gecikmiş kaynama, kaynamama, malunion ya da ST artriti oranlarında gruplar arasında anlamlı fark saptanmadı. Sonuç: Her iki tedavi yöntemi de nondeplase veya minimal deplase skafoid kırıklarında yüksek kaynama oranları sağlamaktadır. Perkütan fiksasyon, daha hızlı kırık iyileşmesi, daha erken işe dönüş ve erken dönem fonksiyonel avantajlar sunmaktadır. Ancak bir yıllık takipte fonksiyonel sonuçlar benzer düzeydedir. Cerrahi tedavi, erken mobilizasyona ihtiyaç duyan genç ve aktif hastalar için avantaj sağlarken, konservatif yaklaşım uyumlu hastalar için geçerli ve ekonomik bir alternatiftir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erdoğan, E., Güneş, Z. (2025). Analysis of mid-term radiological and functional results of conservative versus surgical intervention in non-displaced and minimally displaced scaphoid fractures. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 7 Issue: 6. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1756959

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. Hove LM. Epidemiology of scaphoid fractures in Bergen, Norway.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999;33(4):423-426. doi:10.1080/ 02844319950159145
  2. Larsen CF, Brøndum V, Skov O. Epidemiology of scaphoid fractures in Odense, Denmark. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;63(2):216-218. doi:10.3109/ 17453679209154827
  3. Duckworth AD, Jenkins PJ, Aitken SA, Clement ND, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM. Scaphoid fracture epidemiology. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(2):E41-E45. doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e31822458e8
  4. Clementson M, Björkman A, Thomsen NOB. Acute scaphoid fractures: guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5(2):96-103. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.5.190025
  5. Gäbler C, Kukla C, Breitenseher MJ, Trattnig S, Vécsei V. Diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures and other wrist injuries. Are repeated clinical examinations and plain radiographs still state of the art? Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;386(2):150-154. doi:10.1007/s004230000195
  6. Arsalan-Werner A, Sauerbier M, Mehling IM. Current concepts for the treatment of acute scaphoid fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016; 42(1):3-10. doi:10.1007/s00068-015-0587-8
  7. Jørgsholm P, Thomsen NO, Besjakov J, Abrahamsson SO, Björkman A. The benefit of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with posttraumatic radial wrist tenderness. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(1):29-33. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.034
  8. Ring D, Lozano-Calderón S. Imaging for suspected scaphoid fracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(6):954-957. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.04.016
  9. De Zwart AD, Beeres FJ, Ring D, et al. MRI as a reference standard for suspected scaphoid fractures. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1016):1098-1101. doi: 10.1259/bjr/73145885
  10. Herbert TJ, Fisher WE. Management of the fractured scaphoid using a new bone screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66(1):114-123. doi:10.1302/ 0301-620X.66B1.6693468
  11. Ten Berg PW, Drijkoningen T, Strackee SD, Buijze GA. Classifications of acute scaphoid fractures: a systematic literature review. J Wrist Surg. 2016;5(2):152-159. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1571280
  12. Russe O. Fracture of the carpal navicular. Diagnosis, non-operative treatment, and operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960;42-A:759-768.
  13. Cooney WP, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL. Fractures of the scaphoid: a rational approach to management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;(149):90-97.
  14. Dean BJF, Riley ND, McCulloch ER, Lane JCE, Touzell AB, Graham AJ. A new acute scaphoid fracture assessment method: a reliability study of the 'long axis' measurement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):310. doi:10.1186/s12891-018-2236-y
  15. Eastley N, Singh H, Dias JJ, Taub N. Union rates after proximal scaphoid fractures; meta-analyses and review of available evidence. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013;38(8):888-897. doi:10.1177/1753193412451424
  16. Ramamurthy C, Cutler L, Nuttall D, Simison AJ, Trail IA, Stanley JK. The factors affecting outcome after non-vascular bone grafting and internal fixation for nonunion of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(5):627-632. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.89B5.18183
  17. Prosser AJ, Brenkel IJ, Irvine GB. Articular fractures of the distal scaphoid. J Hand Surg Br. 1988;13(1):87-91. doi:10.1016/0266-7681_88_ 90061-7
  18. Rainbow MJ, Kamal RN, Leventhal E, et al. In vivo kinematics of the scaphoid, lunate, capitate, and third metacarpal in extreme wrist flexion and extension. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(2):278-288. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa. 2012.10.035
  19. Grewal R, Lutz K, MacDermid JC, Suh N. Proximal pole scaphoid fractures: a computed tomographic assessment of outcomes. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41(1):54-58. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.10.013
  20. Clementson M, Jørgsholm P, Besjakov J, Björkman A, Thomsen N. Union of scaphoid waist fractures assessed by CT scan. J Wrist Surg. 2015;4(1):49-55. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1398472
  21. Buijze GA, Jørgsholm P, Thomsen NO, Björkman A, Besjakov J, Ring D. Factors associated with arthroscopically determined scaphoid fracture displacement and instability. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(7):1405-1410. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.04.005
  22. Clementson M, Jørgsholm P, Besjakov J, Thomsen N, Björkman A. Conservative treatment versus arthroscopic-assisted screw fixation of scaphoid waist fractures--a randomized trial with minimum 4-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(7):1341-1348. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa. 2015.03.007
  23. Suh N, Grewal R. Controversies and best practices for acute scaphoid fracture management. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018;43(1):4-12. doi:10.1177/ 1753193417735973
  24. Majeed H. Non-operative treatment versus percutaneous fixation for minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures in high demand young manual workers. J Orthop Traumatol. 2014;15(4):239-244. doi:10.1007/s10195-014-0293-z
  25. Hughes TB. Acute scaphoid waist fracture in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. 2020;39(2):339-351. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2019.12.007
  26. Fyllos A, Komnos G, Koutis A, Bargiotas K, Varitimidis S, Dailiana Z. Comparison of minimally invasive operative treatment with conservative treatment for acute, minimally displaced scaphoid fractures at 12 months' follow-up. J Wrist Surg. 2021;10(3):216-223. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722333
  27. Vinnars B, Pietreanu M, Bodestedt A, Ekenstam Fa, Gerdin B. Nonoperative compared with operative treatment of acute scaphoid fractures. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(6): 1176-1185. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00673
  28. Bushnell BD, McWilliams AD, Messer TM. Complications in dorsal percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of nondisplaced scaphoid waist fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(6):827-833. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2007. 04.003
  29. McQueen MM, Gelbke MK, Wakefield A, Will EM, Gaebler C. Percutaneous screw fixation versus conservative treatment for fractures of the waist of the scaphoid: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(1):66-71. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B1.19767
  30. Shen L, Tang J, Luo C, Xie X, An Z, Zhang C. Comparison of operative and non-operative treatment of acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0125247. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125247
  31. Ibrahim T, Qureshi A, Sutton AJ, Dias JJ. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute minimally displaced and undisplaced scaphoid waist fractures: pairwise and network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(11):1759-1768.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2011. 08.033
  32. Al-Ajmi TA, Al-Faryan KH, Al-Kanaan NF, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing surgical versus conservative treatments for acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures. Clin Orthop Surg. 2018;10(1):64-73. doi:10. 4055/cios.2018.10.1.64
  33. Dias JJ, Brealey SD, Fairhurst C, et al. Surgery versus cast immobilisation for adults with a bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist (SWIFFT): a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10248):390-401. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30931-4
  34. Li H, Guo W, Guo S, Zhao S, Li R. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for scaphoid waist fracture with slight or no displacement: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(48): e13266. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000013266
  35. Skirven T, Trope J. Complications of immobilization. Hand Clin. 1994; 10(1):53-61.
  36. Surucu S, Kehribar L. Non-displaced scaphoid waist fractures: percutaneous screw fixation versus cast immobilization. Cureus. 2022; 14(2):e22684. doi:10.7759/cureus.22684
  37. Jurkowitsch J, Dall'Ara E, Quadlbauer S, et al. Rotational stability in screw-fixed scaphoid fractures compared to plate-fixed scaphoid fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(11):1623-1628. doi:10. 1007/s00402-016-2556-z