Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 2

The importance of prenatal diagnosis of congenital CMV infections and its relationship with prenatal clinical findings through molecular detection of CMV DNA in amniotic fluid samples

Mustafa Önel(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TIBBİ MİKROBİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-3987-6611
Hayriye Kırkoyun Uysal(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TIBBİ MİKROBİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-2476-3796
Arat Hulikyan(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TIBBİ MİKROBİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0003-0592-7297
Derya Sevimli(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TIBBİ MİKROBİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI)0009-0002-0526-6759
Tuğba Saraç Sivrikoz(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, CERRAHİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, KADIN HASTALIKLARI VE DOĞUM ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0001-5482-9429
Recep Has(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, CERRAHİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, KADIN HASTALIKLARI VE DOĞUM ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-1372-8506
Mehmet Demirci(KIRKLARELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TEMEL TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, TIBBİ MİKROBİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0001-9670-2426
Eray Yurtseven(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, BİYOİSTATİSTİK ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0003-0565-6407
Ali Ağaçfidan(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TIBBİ MİKROBİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-5470-296X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-10
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings support the use of molecular diagnostic methods alongside ultrasonographic evaluation, as maternal serological screening alone may be insufficient for accurate prenatal CMV diagnosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is a major cause of prenatal morbidity, frequently associated with central nervous system (CNS) involvement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study included 238 pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis between January 2023 and November 2025 due to high-risk ultrasound findings identified by experienced perinatologists.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings support the use of molecular diagnostic methods alongside ultrasonographic evaluation, as maternal serological screening alone may be insufficient for accurate prenatal CMV diagnosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Prenatal diagnosis · amniotic fluid · CMV

Abstract

Aims: Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is a major cause of prenatal morbidity, frequently associated with central nervous system (CNS) involvement. This study aimed to determine the frequency of CMV DNA in amniotic fluid (AF) samples obtained from pregnancies with high-risk ultrasound findings suggestive of prenatal CMV infection during the second trimester and to evaluate the associated prenatal findings. Methods: This retrospective study included 238 pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis between January 2023 and November 2025 due to high-risk ultrasound findings identified by experienced perinatologists. CMV DNA in AF samples was detected using Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR). Maternal CMV IgG and IgM serological results were obtained from patient records. Prenatal ultrasound findings, serological data, and molecular test results were analyzed statistically. Results: CMV DNA was detected in 10 of 238 AF samples (4.20%; 95% confidence interval: 1.7-6.8%). In cases with CMV DNA positivity, prenatal ultrasound findings predominantly involved CNS anomalies (80%). CMV IgG positivity was observed in all CMV DNA-positive cases, while CMV IgM positivity was not detected in any patient. Conclusion: The strong association between CNS-predominant ultrasound anomalies and CMV DNA positivity underscores the diagnostic value of CMV DNA PCR testing in AF samples for prenatal CMV infection. These findings support the use of molecular diagnostic methods alongside ultrasonographic evaluation, as maternal serological screening alone may be insufficient for accurate prenatal CMV diagnosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

Önel, M., Uysal, H. K., Hulikyan, A., Sevimli, D., Sivrikoz, T. S., Has, R., Demirci, M., Yurtseven, E., Ağaçfidan, A. (2026). The importance of prenatal diagnosis of congenital CMV infections and its relationship with prenatal clinical findings through molecular detection of CMV DNA in amniotic fluid samples. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1858404

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Liberati C, Sturniolo G, Brigadoi G, et al. Burden of congenital cmv infection: a narrative review and implications for public health interventions. Viruses. 2024;16(8):1311. doi:10.3390/v16081311
  2. Davis NL, King CC, Kourtis AP. Cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Birth Defects Res. 2017;109(5):336-346. doi:10.1002/bdra.23601
  3. Schleiss MR, Panther L, Basnet S, Workneh M, Diaz-Decaro J. Comparison of overall sensitivity and specificity across different newborn screening algorithms for congenital cytomegalovirus. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2023;9(2):33. doi:10.3390/ijns9020033
  4. Prosser JD, Holmes TW, Seyyedi M, Choo DI. Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) for the pediatric otolaryngologist. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;148:110809. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110809
  5. Leber AL. Maternal and congenital human cytomegalovirus infection: laboratory testing for detection and diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2024; 62(4):e0031323. doi:10.1128/jcm.00313-23
  6. Chiereghin A, Pavia C, Turello G, et al. Universal newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection - from infant to maternal infection: a prospective multicenter study. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:909646. doi:10.3389/fped.2022.909646
  7. Fowler KB, Boppana SB. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Semin Perinatol. 2018;42(3):149-154. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2018.02.002
  8. Krstanović F, Britt WJ, Jonjić S, Brizić I. Cytomegalovirus Infection and inflammation in developing brain. Viruses. 2021;13(6):1078. doi:10. 3390/v13061078
  9. Palmetti M, Venturini E, Bartolini L, Chiappini E, Lyall H, Galli L. Congenital CMV infection and central nervous system involvement: mechanisms, treatment, and long-term outcomes. Eur J Pediatr. 2025; 184(6):381. doi:10.1007/s00431-025-06215-4
  10. Coskun E, Kakkar F, Riley LE, Ciaranello AL, Prabhu M. Evaluation and management of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2025;145(3):297-306. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005840
  11. Nigro G, Muselli M, On behalf of the congenital cytomegalic disease collaborating group. prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection: review and case series of valaciclovir versus hyperimmune globulin therapy. Viruses. 2023;15(6):1376. doi:10.3390/v15061376
  12. Tanimura K, Uchida A, Uenaka M, et al. Fetal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in congenital cytomegalovirus infection associated with and without fetal growth restriction. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(2):306. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13020306
  13. Kang H, Wang L, Chen Y, Dong T, Pan Y, Liu Q. Screening and prenatal diagnosis of fetal cytomegalovirus infection: experience in a western Chinese city. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25(1):542. doi:10.1186/s12879-025-10910-w
  14. Mappa I, D'Antonio F, Khalil A, et al. Prognostic value of amniotic fluid viral load to predict adverse outcome in pregnancies complicated by congenital cytomegalovirus infection: a multicenter study. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2023;50(1):1-7. doi:10.1159/000528936
  15. Dinsmoor MJ, Fette LM, Hughes BL, et al. Amniocentesis to diagnose congenital cytomegalovirus infection following maternal primary infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4(4):100641. doi:10.1016/ j.ajogmf.2022.100641
  16. Chiereghin A, Pavia C, Gabrielli L, et al. Clinical evaluation of the new Roche platform of serological and molecular cytomegalovirus-specific assays in the diagnosis and prognosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Virol Methods. 2017;248:250-254. doi:10.1016/j.jviromet. 2017.08.004
  17. Saxena SK, Prakash H. Innate immunity in health and disease. Intechopen. 2021.
  18. Fowler K, Mucha J, Neumann M, et al. A systematic literature review of the global seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus: possible implications for treatment, screening, and vaccine development. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1659. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13971-7
  19. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Hughes BL, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Diagnosis and antenatal management of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):B5-B11. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.042
  20. Leruez-Ville M, Foulon I, Pass R, Ville Y. Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: state of the science. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(3): 330-349. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.018