Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Comparative evaluation of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 and isthmin-1 immunoreactivity in malignant mesothelioma and reactive mesothelial hyperplasia

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicate that LRRK2 and ISM-1 could be clinically useful biomarkers for distinguishing MM from RMH and may also have potential prognostic value, highlighting the need for further research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study was designed to investigate the immunohistochemical expression Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (Dardarin, LRRK2) and Isthmin-1 (ISM-1) in tumor tissues from patients with MM, alongside a comparison to reactive mesothelial hyperplasia (RMH).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 60 MM and 60 RMH cases who had not received preoperative adjuvant therapy were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicate that LRRK2 and ISM-1 could be clinically useful biomarkers for distinguishing MM from RMH and may also have potential prognostic value, highlighting the need for further research.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Malignant mesothelioma · reactive mesothelial hyperplasia · LRRK2

Abstract

Aims: This study was designed to investigate the immunohistochemical expression Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (Dardarin, LRRK2) and Isthmin-1 (ISM-1) in tumor tissues from patients with MM, alongside a comparison to reactive mesothelial hyperplasia (RMH). Methods: A total of 60 MM and 60 RMH cases who had not received preoperative adjuvant therapy were included in the study. Immunohistochemical staining for LRRK2 and ISM-1 were conducted on 4-6 µm thick sections prepared from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks. Results: Histopathological examination of MM cases revealed neoplastic formations with tubulopapillary architecture lined by mesothelial cells exhibiting moderate nuclear atypia and eosinophilic cytoplasm. In RMH cases, proliferating mesothelial cells lining an inflamed, edematous, and congested pleural surface were observed. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that ISM-1 and LRRK2 expression levels were markedly elevated in MM tumor samples compared with RMH samples (p<0.001). Conclusion: Both LRRK2 and ISM-1 immunoreactivity were increased in malignant mesothelioma compared with RMH. However, the potential regulatory effects of these molecules on each other’s expression remain unclear. These results indicate that LRRK2 and ISM-1 could be clinically useful biomarkers for distinguishing MM from RMH and may also have potential prognostic value, highlighting the need for further research.

🔖

Cite This Article

Türk, A., Yılmaz, M., Kocaman, N., Üçer, Ö., Bayrak, G. (2026). Comparative evaluation of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 and isthmin-1 immunoreactivity in malignant mesothelioma and reactive mesothelial hyperplasia. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1889409

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Marinaccio A, Binazzi A, Marzio DD, et al. Pleural malignant mesothelioma epidemic: incidence, modalities of asbestos exposure and occupations involved from the Italian National Register. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(9):2146-2154. doi:10.1002/ijc.26229
  2. Hajj GNM, Cavarson CH, Pinto CAL, Venturi G, Navarro JR, Lima VCC. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an update. J Bras Pneumol. 2021;47(6):e20210129. doi:10.36416/1806-3756/e20210129
  3. Tsao AS, Wistuba I, Roth JA, Kindler HL. Malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(12):2081-2090. doi:10.1200/JCO. 2008.19.8523
  4. Zucali PA, Ceresoli GL, De Vincenzo F, et al. Advances in the biology of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011;37(7):543-558. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.01.001
  5. Driscoll KE, Maurer JK, Higgins J, Poynter J. Alveolar macrophage cytokine and growth factor production in a rat model of crocidolite-induced pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1995;46(2):155-169. doi:10.1080/15287399509532026
  6. Leard LE, Broaddus VC. Mesothelial cell proliferation and apoptosis. Respirology. 2004;9(3):292-299. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2004.00602
  7. Mutsaers SE. Mesothelial cells: their structure, function and role in serosal repair. Respirology. 2002;7(3):171-191. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1843.2002.00404.x
  8. Suzuki K, Kadota K, Sima CS, et al. Chronic inflammation in tumor stroma is an independent predictor of prolonged survival in epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011;60(12):1721-1728. doi:10.1007/s00262-011-1073-8
  9. Ramos-Nino ME, Testa JR, Altomare DA, et al. Cellular and molecular parameters of mesothelioma. J Cell Biochem. 2006;98(4):723-734. doi:10. 1002/jcb.20828
  10. Manning CB, Cummins AB, Jung MW, et al. A mutant epidermal growth factor receptor targeted to lung epithelium inhibits asbestos-induced proliferation and proto-oncogene expression. Cancer Res. 2002; 62(15):4169-4175.
  11. Nicholson AG, Sauter JL, Nowak AK, et al. EURACAN/IASLC proposals for updating the histologic classification of pleural mesothelioma: towards a more multidisciplinary approach. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15(1):29-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.2506
  12. Churg A, Naso JR. The separation of benign and malignant mesothelial proliferations: new markers and how to use them. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44(11):e100-e112. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000001565
  13. Eguchi T, Kadota K, Mayor M, et al. Cancer antigen profiling for malignant pleural mesothelioma immunotherapy: expression and coexpression of mesothelin, cancer antigen 125, and Wilms tumor 1. Oncotarget. 2017;8(44): 77872-77882. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.20845
  14. Husain AN, Chapel DB, Attanoos R, et al. Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of mesothelioma: 2023 update of the consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2024;148(11):1251-1271. doi:10.5858/arpa.2023-0304-RA
  15. Lee AF, Gown AM, Churg A. IMP3 and GLUT-1 immunohistochemistry for distinguishing benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(3):421-426. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e31826ab1c0
  16. Chang S, Oh MH, Ji SY, et al. Practical utility of insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding protein 3, glucose transporter 1, and epithelial membrane antigen for distinguishing malignant mesotheliomas from benign mesothelial proliferations. Pathol Int. 2014;64(12):607-612. doi: 10.1111/pin.12216
  17. Attanoos RL, Griffin A, Gibbs AR. The use of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing reactive from neoplastic mesothelium. A novel use for desmin and comparative evaluation with epithelial membrane antigen, p53, platelet-derived growth factor-receptor, P-glycoprotein and Bcl-2. Histopathology. 2003;43(3):231-238. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01686.x
  18. Hasteh F, Lin GY, Weidner N, Michael CW. The use of immunohistochemistry to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in cytologic effusions. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118(2):90-96. doi:10.1002/cncy. 20071
  19. Jiang Z, Zhao M, Voilquin L, et al. Isthmin-1 is an adipokine that promotes glucose uptake and improves glucose tolerance and hepatic steatosis. Cell Metab. 2021;33(9):1836-1852.e11. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2021.07.010
  20. Hu M, Zhang X, Hu C, Teng T, Tang QZ. A brief overview about the adipokine: Isthmin-1. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:939757. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.939757
  21. Zhou X, Zhang K, Wang C, et al. Isthmin-1 promotes growth and progression of colorectal cancer through the interaction with EGFR and YBX-1. Cancer Lett. 2024;590:216868. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216868
  22. Turk A, Metin TO, Kuloglu T, et al. Isthmin-1 and spexin as promising novel biomarker candidates for invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Tissue Cell. 2024;91:102601. doi:10.1016/j.tice.2024.102601
  23. Wu Y, Liang X, Ni J, et al. Effect of ISM1 on the immune microenvironment and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:681240. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.681240
  24. Rosenbusch KE, Oun A, Sanislav O, et al. A conserved role for LRRK2 and Roco proteins in the regulation of mitochondrial activity. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:734554. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.734554
  25. Yan J, Zhao W, Yu W, Cheng H, Zhu B. LRRK2 correlates with macrophage infiltration in pan-cancer. Genomics. 2022;114(1):316-327. doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.11.037
  26. Goveas L, Mutez E, Chartier-Harlin MC, Taymans JM. Mind the gap: LRRK2 phenotypes in the clinic vs. in patient cells. Cells. 2021;10(5):981. doi:10.3390/cells10050981
  27. Jiang ZC, Chen XJ, Zhou Q, Gong XH, Chen X, Wu WJ. Downregulated LRRK2 gene expression inhibits proliferation and migration while promoting the apoptosis of thyroid cancer cells by inhibiting activation of the JNK signaling pathway. Int J Oncol. 2019;55(1):21-34. doi:10.3892/ijo.2019.4816
  28. Jung K, Choi JS, Koo BM, et al. TM4SF4 and LRRK2 are potential therapeutic targets in lung and breast cancers through outlier analysis. Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(1):9-24. doi:10.4143/crt.2020.434
  29. Yang C, Pang J, Xu J, et al. LRRK2 is a candidate prognostic biomarker for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):343. doi:10. 1186/s12935-021-02047-y
  30. Wallings R, Manzoni C, Bandopadhyay R. Cellular processes associated with LRRK2 function and dysfunction. FEBS J. 2015;282(15):2806-2826. doi:10.1111/febs.13305
  31. Menghuan L, Yang Y, Qianhe M, et al. Advances in research of biological functions of isthmin-1. J Cell Commun Signal. 2023;17(3):507-521. doi:10. 1007/s12079-023-00732-3
  32. Wang Y, Gao JZ, Sakaguchi T, et al. LRRK2 G2019S promotes colon cancer potentially via LRRK2-GSDMD axis-mediated gut inflammation. Cells. 2024;13(7):565. doi:10.3390/cells1307056
  33. Lebovitz C, Wretham N, Osooly M, et al. Loss of Parkinson's susceptibility gene LRRK2 promotes carcinogen-induced lung tumorigenesis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2097. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81639-0