Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Food-induced anaphylaxis in adults: a single-center experience from Adana, Turkiye

Leyla Çevirme(Adana City Training and Research Hospital)0009-0005-8940-0485
Güzin Özden(University of Health Sciences, Adana City Training and Research Hospital)0000-0003-4856-2267
Susamber Dik(Adana City Training and Research Hospital)0000-0001-9596-3931
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Early diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and referral to allergy specialists are essential to prevent recurrence and reduce mortality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: To evaluate the clinical characteristics, triggering factors, severity, and management of food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA) in adult patients in Adana, Turkiye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: 118 patients examined at the outpatient clinic and diagnosed with anaphylaxis using the ICD code T78.0 (anaphylactic shock, due to adverse food reactions), T78.2 (anaphylactic shock, unidentified) were screened.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Early diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and referral to allergy specialists are essential to prevent recurrence and reduce mortality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anaphylaxis · food · fruit

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the clinical characteristics, triggering factors, severity, and management of food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA) in adult patients in Adana, Turkiye. Methods: 118 patients examined at the outpatient clinic and diagnosed with anaphylaxis using the ICD code T78.0 (anaphylactic shock, due to adverse food reactions), T78.2 (anaphylactic shock, unidentified) were screened. A retrospective study was conducted on 56 patients among these patients who had a history of FIA in their records. Demographic data, comorbidities, clinical symptoms, triggering foods, time to onset of symptoms, and treatment approaches were recorded and analysed. Results: A total of 56 patients with FIA were included in the analysis. There were no missing data for demographic or clinical variables. Of the study population, 41 patients (73.2%) were female and 15 (26.8%) were male. The mean age of the patients was 35.8±12.7 years. A history of drug allergy was present in 7 patients (12.5%). Atopy was present in 30 patients (53.6%). Allergic rhinitis was present in 16 patients (28.6%). Asthma was reported in 9 patients (16.1%). The food group most frequently associated with reactions was fruit. The most frequently reacted fruit was the peach. The food most frequently associated with reactions was peanuts. Conclusion: FIA is an important cause of morbidity in adults. Management in emergency departments is inadequate, especially regarding the administration of intramuscular epinephrine. Early diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and referral to allergy specialists are essential to prevent recurrence and reduce mortality.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çevirme, L., Özden, G., Dik, S. (2026). Food-induced anaphylaxis in adults: a single-center experience from Adana, Turkiye. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1864928

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Turner PJ, Arasi S, Ballmer-Weber B, et al. Risk factors for severe reactions in food allergy: rapid evidence review with meta-analysis. Allergy. 2022;77(9):2634-2652. doi:10.1111/all.15318
  2. Jimenez-Garcia R, Lopez-de-Andres A, Hernandez-Barrera V, et al. Hospitalizations for food-induced anaphylaxis between 2016 and 2021: population-based epidemiologic study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024;10:e57340. doi:10.2196/57340
  3. Baseggio Conrado A, Patel N, Turner PJ. Global patterns in anaphylaxis due to specific foods: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021; 148(6):1515-1525.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.048
  4. Suber J, Iweala OI. Strategies for mast cell inhibition in food allergy. Yale J Biol Med. 2020;93(5):719-731.
  5. Brown SGA. Clinical features and severity grading of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114(2):371-376. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.04.029
  6. Comparison of singleplex specific IgE detection immunoassays: ImmunoCAP Phadia 250 and Immulite 2000 3gAllergy. Accessed July 16, 2025.
  7. Chong T, Olivieri B, Skypala IJ. Food-triggered anaphylaxis in adults. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024;24(5):341-348. doi:10.1097/ACI. 0000000000001008
  8. Öztürk BÖ, Akın BG, Durmaz MSB, Soyyiğit Ş. Is hen’s egg a significant allergen in adults too? Findings from an investigation into food allergy prevalence. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2025;53(2):13-23. doi:10.15586/aei.v53i2.1263
  9. Dölle-Bierke S, Höfer V, Francuzik W, et al. Food-induced anaphylaxis: data from the European anaphylaxis registry. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023;11(7):2069-2079.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2023.03.026
  10. Wilson JM, Platts-Mills TAE. Meat allergy and allergens. Mol Immunol. 2018;100:107-112. doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2018.03.018
  11. Reddy S, Yi L, Shields B, Platts-Mills T, Wilson J, Flowers RH. Alpha-gal syndrome: a review for the dermatologist. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023; 89(4):750-757. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2023.04.054
  12. Shaker MS, Wallace DV, Golden DBK, et al. Anaphylaxis-a 2020 practice parameter update, systematic review, and grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(4):1082-1123. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2020.01.017
  13. Novembre E, Gelsomino M, Liotti L, et al. Fatal food anaphylaxis in adults and children. Ital J Pediatr. 2024;50:40. doi:10.1186/s13052-024-01608-x
  14. Turner PJ, Jerschow E, Umasunthar T, Lin R, Campbell DE, Boyle RJ. Fatal anaphylaxis: mortality rate and risk factors. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5(5):1169-1178. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2017.06.031
  15. Baseggio Conrado A, Ierodiakonou D, Gowland MH, Boyle RJ, Turner PJ. Food anaphylaxis in the United Kingdom: analysis of national data, 1998-2018. BMJ. 2021;372:n251. doi:10.1136/bmj.n251
  16. Umasunthar T, Leonardi-Bee J, Hodes M, et al. Incidence of fatal food anaphylaxis in people with food allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43(12):1333-1341. doi:10.1111/cea.12211
  17. Özhan AK, Yalaki Aİ, Akbey V, et al. İnfant anafilaksi olgularının klinik ve laboratuvar özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Mersin Univ Saglık Bilim Derg. 2023;16(3):483-494.
  18. Miles LM, Ratnarajah K, Gabrielli S, et al. Community use of epinephrine for the treatment of anaphylaxis: a review and meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(6):2321-2333. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.038
  19. Ducharme L, Gabrielli S, Clarke AE, et al. Tree nut-induced anaphylaxis in Canadian emergency departments: rate, clinical characteristics, and management. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022;129(3):335-341. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.06.008
  20. Sehayek D, Gold MS, Gabrielli S, et al. Seafood-induced anaphylaxis in children presenting to Canadian emergency departments: rates, clinical presentation, and management. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022; 128(5):583-588. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2022.02.003
  21. Kitamura K, Ito T, Ito K. Comprehensive hospital-based regional survey of anaphylaxis in Japanese children: time trends of triggers and adrenaline use. Allergol Int. 2021;70(4):452-457. doi:10.1016/j.alit.2021. 04.009
  22. Comberiati P, Spahn J, Peroni DG. Anaphylaxis in adolescents. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;19(5):425-431. doi:10.1097/ACI. 0000000000000572
  23. Santos AF, Riggioni C, Agache I, et al. EAACI guidelines on the management of IgE‐mediated food allergy. Allergy. 2025;80(1):14-36. doi:10.1111/all.16345