Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 4

Systemic inflammation and aggressive clinical behavior in small cell lung cancer

Güzide Tomas(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL SULTAN ABDÜLHAMİD HAN SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0009-0007-8739-7969
Mustafa Düger(medipol üniversitesi, istanbul)0000-0002-4091-6465
Oğuz Bilgi(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL SULTAN ABDÜLHAMİD HAN SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0003-1493-4579
Şeyma Başlılar(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL SULTAN ABDÜLHAMİD HAN SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0003-1495-6508
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated using Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by rapid progression, early metastasis, and poor survival outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 104 patients with histologically confirmed SCLC treated between January 2016 and December 2024 were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated using Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Small cell lung cancer · systemic inflammation · myeloid dominant immunity

Abstract

Aims: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by rapid progression, early metastasis, and poor survival outcomes. While its aggressive behavior has traditionally been attributed to near universal genetic alterations, emerging evidence suggests that systemic inflammation and tumor host immune interactions may play a critical role in shaping disease aggressiveness. However, the prognostic significance of multiple inflammation-based biomarkers beyond established clinical factors remains incompletely defined. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 104 patients with histologically confirmed SCLC treated between January 2016 and December 2024 were analyzed. Baseline systemic inflammatory indices, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), Systemic Immune-inflammation Index (SII), Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI), and hemoglobin to red cell distribution width ratio (HGB/RDW), were calculated from peripheral blood samples obtained at diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated using Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Multivariable analyses were performed using a clinical base model incorporating age, disease stage, ECOG performance status, and chemotherapy exposure, with inflammatory markers added individually. Results: During follow-up, 67 patients (64.4%) died. In univariate analyses, older age, lack of chemotherapy, and all inflammation based biomarkers were significantly associated with worse OS and DSS. In multivariable analyses, age and chemotherapy status remained independent predictors of OS. When added individually to the clinical base model, higher SII, SIRI, NLR, PLR, and MLR were independently associated with increased risks of both overall and disease-specific mortality, whereas higher HGB/RDW ratios were associated with improved survival. Kaplan Meier analyses demonstrated significantly poorer OS and DSS in patients with high NLR values compared with those with low NLR (log-rank p<0.001 for both). Conclusions: Multiple inflammation-based biomarkers were significantly associated with both OS and DSS in patients with SCLC. These associations remained evident after adjustment for established clinical prognostic factors, suggesting that systemic inflammation may provide additional prognostic information beyond conventional clinical variables. The consistent associations observed across several inflammatory indices support their potential utility in risk stratification. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and clarify the biological mechanisms underlying these associations.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tomas, G., Düger, M., Bilgi, O., Başlılar, Ş. (2026). Systemic inflammation and aggressive clinical behavior in small cell lung cancer. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1948334

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Sen T, Takahashi N, Chakraborty S, et al. Emerging advances in defining the molecular and therapeutic landscape of small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024;21(8):610-627. doi:10.1038/s41571-024-00914-x
  2. Megyesfalvi Z, Gay CM, Popper H, et al. Clinical insights into small cell lung cancer: tumor heterogeneity, diagnosis, therapy, and future directions. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(6):620-652. doi:10.3322/caac.21785
  3. Riemann D, Turzer S, Ganchev G, Schütte W, Seliger B, Möller M. Monitoring blood immune cells in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer undergoing a combined immune checkpoint inhibitor/chemotherapy. Biomolecules. 2023;13(2):190. doi:10.3390/biom13020190
  4. Uzun M, Hamitoglu B, Gokcek S, Ellez HI, Oztop I. The prognostic role of SIRI and PIV in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer receiving systemic chemotherapy. Research Square [Preprint]. 2024. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4774661/v1
  5. Hamakawa Y, Hirahara A, Hayashi A, et al. Prognostic value of Systemic Immune-inflammation Index in patients with small-cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. BMC Cancer. 2025;25(1):17. doi:10.1186/s12885-025-13440-5
  6. Cao G, Liu Q, Wen H, Zeng Y. The prognostic importance of the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025;14(10):4357-4370. doi:10.21037/tlcr-2025-518
  7. Zhong J, Jie G, Qin H, et al. Immunotherapy for small cell lung cancer: current challenges and prospects. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2025;14(1):130. doi:10.1186/s40164-025-00720-w
  8. Runtsch MC, Angiari S, Kargl J. Targeting myeloid cell immunometabolism to improve current non-small cell lung cancer therapies. Pharmacol Ther. 2025;273:108893. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2025.108893
  9. Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Wen J, Wang Y, Li J. Impact of Systemic Immune-inflammation Index and its evaluation of optimal threshold in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study based on 572 cases. Transl Cancer Res. 2025;14(1):371-382. doi:10.21037/tcr-24-1266
  10. Liu Y, Qu J, Hu C, et al. Relationship between red cell distribution width and lung cancer: evidence from Mendelian randomization and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Discov Oncol. 2025;16(1):867. doi:10.1007/s12672-025-02718-6