Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 4

Association between hematological parameters and thyroid malignancy: a retrospective cohort study

Bahadır Öndeş(MALATYA TURGUT ÖZAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8080-9664
Burhan Hakan Kanat(MALATYA TURGUT ÖZAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-1168-0833
Gökhan Söğütlü(MALATYA TURGUT ÖZAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-6746-3857
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hematological parameters may be useful as adjunctive markers when interpreted alongside clinical and radiological findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the association between hematological parameters and malignancy in thyroid nodules and to investigate their potential roles in predicting malignancy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 563 patients who underwent thyroid surgery between January 2022 and December 2025 were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hematological parameters may be useful as adjunctive markers when interpreted alongside clinical and radiological findings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Thyroid nodule · thyroid cancer · hematological parameters

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the association between hematological parameters and malignancy in thyroid nodules and to investigate their potential roles in predicting malignancy. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 563 patients who underwent thyroid surgery between January 2022 and December 2025 were included. Patients were divided into benign and malignant groups according to pathological results. Demographic characteristics, surgical and nodule features, and hematological parameters (Systemic Immune-inflammation Index [SII], lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio [L/M], red cell distribution width [RDW], and mean platelet volume [MPV]) were compared. Associations between variables were assessed using correlation analysis, and independent predictors of malignancy were identified by logistic regression analysis. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Benign pathology was detected in 80.6% of patients and malignancy in 19.4%. No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of sex, age, surgical method, or number of nodules (p>0.05). The maximum nodule diameter was significantly higher in the benign group (p<0.001). SII and MPV values were significantly higher in the malignant group (p<0.001), whereas no significant differences were found for L/M ratio and RDW. In multivariate analysis, maximum nodule diameter (OR=0.90; p<0.001), SII (p=0.005), and MPV (OR=1.64; p<0.001) were independently associated with malignancy. ROC analysis showed that maximum nodule diameter had high diagnostic performance (AUC=0.84), whereas SII (AUC=0.63) and MPV (AUC=0.65) demonstrated limited diagnostic value. Conclusion: Although SII and MPV were associated with thyroid malignancy, they do not have sufficient diagnostic accuracy as standalone markers. Maximum nodule diameter appears to be a stronger predictor of malignancy. Hematological parameters may be useful as adjunctive markers when interpreted alongside clinical and radiological findings.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öndeş, B., Kanat, B. H., Söğütlü, G. (2026). Association between hematological parameters and thyroid malignancy: a retrospective cohort study. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1954110

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1-133. doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020
  2. Durante C, Grani G, Lamartina L, et al. The diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules: a review. JAMA. 2018;319(9):914-924. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0898
  3. Filetti S, Durante C, Hartl D, et al. Thyroid cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(12):1856-1883. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz400
  4. Zhao H, Wu L, Yan G, et al. Inflammation and tumor progression: signaling pathways and targeted intervention. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):263. doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00658-5
  5. Hanahan D. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022;12(1):31-46. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059
  6. Mao H, Yang F. Prognostic significance of Systemic Immune-inflammation Index in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1193962. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1193962
  7. Tian BW, Yang YF, Yang CC, et al. Systemic Immune-inflammation Index predicts prognosis of cancer immunotherapy: systemic review and meta-analysis. Immunotherapy. 2022;14(18):1481-1496. doi:10.2217/imt-2022-0133
  8. Denk D, Greten FR. Inflammation: the incubator of the tumor microenvironment. Trends Cancer. 2022;8(11):901-914. doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2022.07.002
  9. Korniluk A, Koper O, Kemona H, Dymicka-Piekarska V. Mean platelet volume (MPV): new perspectives for an old marker in the course and prognosis of inflammatory conditions. Mediators Inflamm. 2019;2019: 9213074. doi:10.1155/2019/9213074
  10. Xu XR, Yousef GM, Ni H. Cancer and platelet crosstalk: opportunities and challenges for aspirin and other antiplatelet agents. Blood. 2018; 131(16):1777-1789. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-05-743187
  11. Xie H, Wei L, Liu M, et al. The cancer inflammation prognostic index is a valuable biomarker for predicting the survival of patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):18080. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-45550-0
  12. Zhang Z, Xia F, Wang W, Huang Y, Li X. The Systemic Immune-inflammation Index-based model is an effective biomarker on predicting central lymph node metastasis in clinically nodal-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma. Gland Surg. 2021;10(4):1368-1373. doi:10.21037/gs-20-666
  13. Russo E, Guizzardi M, Canali L, et al. Preoperative systemic inflammatory markers as prognostic factors in differentiated thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2023;24(6):1205-1216. doi:10.1007/s11154-023-09845-x
  14. Vural S, Muhtaroğlu A, Güngör M. Systemic Immune-inflammation Index: a new marker in differentiation of different thyroid diseases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(31):e34596. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000034596
  15. Kalaycı Ş. SPSS Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım; 2005:359.
  16. Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni, SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. 25. baskı. Pegem Akademi; 2019.
  17. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454(7203):436-444. doi:10.1038/nature07205
  18. Roxburgh CS, McMillan DC. Role of systemic inflammatory response in predicting survival in patients with primary operable cancer. Future Oncol. 2010;6(1):149-163. doi:10.2217/fon.09.136