Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 4

Maternal factors and postnatal orthopedic consultation timing in congenital talipes equinovarus: a 10-year single-center experience

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pre-treatment Pirani score is the strongest predictor of Achilles tenotomy and should be considered a key parameter in treatment planning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) is one of the most common congenital foot deformities and is influenced by multifactorial etiological factors, including genetic predisposition, intrauterine environment, and maternal characteristics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to evaluate the effects of maternal factors and postnatal orthopedic consultation timing on treatment outcomes in newborns with CTEV based on a 10 year single-center experience.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pre-treatment Pirani score is the strongest predictor of Achilles tenotomy and should be considered a key parameter in treatment planning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Congenital clubfoot · talipes equinovarus · Ponseti method

Abstract

Aims: Congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) is one of the most common congenital foot deformities and is influenced by multifactorial etiological factors, including genetic predisposition, intrauterine environment, and maternal characteristics. Early orthopedic consultation is considered critical for the success of the Ponseti method. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of maternal factors and postnatal orthopedic consultation timing on treatment outcomes in newborns with CTEV based on a 10 year single-center experience. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included newborns diagnosed with CTEV between 2015 and 2025 at a tertiary referral center. Maternal, perinatal, and clinical variables-including maternal age, smoking status, gestational complications, mode of delivery, deformity characteristics, consultation timing, treatment initiation time, and Pirani scores-were recorded. All patients were treated using the Ponseti method. Group comparisons were performed using nonparametric statistical tests, and predictors of Achilles tenotomy were evaluated using binary logistic regression analysis. Results: Among 15.132 live births, 38 infants (0.25%) were diagnosed with CTEV. Most cases were bilateral (63.2%), all cases were classified as idiopathic CTEV, and 73.7% were flexible. Maternal smoking was present in 55.3% of cases but showed no significant association with deformity severity, rigidity, or tenotomy requirement (p>0.05). No significant correlations were observed between consultation duration, treatment initiation time, and Pirani scores (p>0.05 for all comparisons). Ponseti treatment resulted in significant improvement in Pirani scores (median 2 to 0, p<0.001). Achilles tenotomy was performed in 52.6% of patients. Logistic regression analysis identified pre-treatment Pirani score as the only independent predictor of tenotomy (OR=3.61, 95% CI: 1.45-8.98, p=0.006). Conclusion: Maternal characteristics and consultation timing do not appear to influence treatment outcomes in newborns with CTEV. Pre-treatment Pirani score is the strongest predictor of Achilles tenotomy and should be considered a key parameter in treatment planning.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alıç, S. B. T., Alıç, T. (2026). Maternal factors and postnatal orthopedic consultation timing in congenital talipes equinovarus: a 10-year single-center experience. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1881381

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Smythe T, Rotenberg S, Lavy C. The global birth prevalence of clubfoot: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;63:102178. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102178
  2. Chen C, Kaushal N, Scher DM, Doyle SM, Blanco JS, Dodwell ER. Clubfoot etiology: a meta-analysis and systematic review of observational and randomized trials. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018;38(8):e462-e469. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000001191
  3. Liu YB, Zhao L, Ding J, et al. Association between maternal age at conception and risk of idiopathic clubfoot. Acta Orthop. 2016;87(3):291-295. doi:10.3109/17453674.2016.1153359
  4. Werler MM, Yazdy MM, Kasser JR, et al. Maternal cigarette, alcohol, and coffee consumption in relation to risk of clubfoot. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015;29(1):3-10. doi:10.1111/ppe.12163
  5. Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Moore CA. Family history, maternal smoking, and clubfoot: an indication of a gene-environment interaction. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(7):658-665. doi:10.1093/aje/152.7.658
  6. Preda A, Ștefan AG, Preda SD, et al. Transient polyhydramnios during pregnancy complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus: case report and systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(6):1340. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12061340
  7. Kim YM, Seong JS, Kim JH, et al. Improving prenatal diagnosis precision for congenital clubfoot by using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(1):117. doi:10.3390/diagnostics14010117
  8. Ruzzini L, De Salvatore S, Longo UG, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of clubfoot: where are we now? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(12):2235. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11122235
  9. Vaishy AK, Arif M, Acharya D, Choudhary R, Seervi PM, Kumar R. Influence of beginning time of casting for clubfoot treatment by Ponseti method in different age group infants: a retrospective study. Indian J Orthop. 2020;54(1):55-59. doi:10.1007/s43465-019-00004-6
  10. Jiang H, Li T. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of Ponseti method for neonate congenital clubfoot. Front Pediatr. 2025;13:1619908. doi:10.3389/fped.2025.1619908
  11. Matuszewski L, Gil L, Karski J. Early results of treatment for congenital clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2012; 22(5):403-406. doi:10.1007/s00590-011-0860-4
  12. Ahmed S, Moosa S, Muhammad AA, et al. Eight-year review of a clubfoot treatment program in Pakistan with assessment of outcomes using the Ponseti technique: a retrospective study of 988 patients (1,458 clubfeet) aged 0 to 5 years at enrollment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022;6(4):e22.00022. doi:10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00022
  13. Pirani S, Outerbridge HK, Sawatzky B, Stothers K. A reliable method of clinically evaluating a virgin clubfoot. In: proceedings of the 21st SICOT Congress; 1999; Sydney. p. 2-30.
  14. Dickinson KC, Meyer RE, Kotch J. Maternal smoking and the risk for clubfoot in infants. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008;82(2):86-91. doi:10.1002/bdra.20417
  15. Sucu M, Demir SC. The relationship between isolated pes equinovarus and aneuploidies and perinatal outcomes: results of a tertiary center. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;17(4):270-277. doi:10.4274/tjod.galenos.2020.60669
  16. Hedley PL, Lausten-Thomsen U, Conway KM, Hindsø K, Romitti PA, Christiansen M. Trends in congenital clubfoot prevalence and co-occurring anomalies during 1994-2021 in Denmark: a nationwide register-based study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):784. doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06889-7
  17. Ahmed HAD, Mohamed AMY, Salih M, et al. Assessing the influence of age, weight, and Pirani score on the number of casts during the initial phase of clubfoot treatment using the Ponseti method: a prospective study. Indian J Orthop. 2024;58(6):687-695. doi:10.1007/s43465-024-01142-2
  18. Limpaphayom N, Sailohit P. Factors related to early recurrence of idiopathic clubfoot post the Ponseti method. Malays Orthop J. 2019; 13(3):28-33. doi:10.5704/MOJ.1911.005
  19. Cady R, Hennessey TA, Schwend RM. Diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic congenital clubfoot. Pediatrics. 2022;149(2):e2021055555. doi:10.1542/peds.2021-055555