Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 4

Minimizing nerve injury in submandibular gland resection: anatomical landmarks and a proposed safe approach

Ömer Selim Al(BEZMI ALEM FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7303-5747
Pelin İsmailoğlu(RECEP TAYYİP ERDOĞAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2631-496X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: A surgical approach involving a skin-platysma-deep fascia flap incision placed 4 cm below the mandibular edge ensures safe exposure of the SMG while preserving both the marginal mandibular and cervical branches of the facial nerve.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study aimed to describe the topographic anatomy of the marginal mandibular nerve (MMN) and cervical branch of facial nerve (CBFN) and propose a surgical technique to reduce the risk of MMN-CBFN injuries during submandibular gland (SMG) resection.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: 12 hemifaces from 7 low-formalin-fixed, red-blue-latex-injected cadaveric heads were dissected under 2.5×magnification using a surgical microscope.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: A surgical approach involving a skin-platysma-deep fascia flap incision placed 4 cm below the mandibular edge ensures safe exposure of the SMG while preserving both the marginal mandibular and cervical branches of the facial nerve.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Facial nerve · submandibular gland · marginal mandibular nerve

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to describe the topographic anatomy of the marginal mandibular nerve (MMN) and cervical branch of facial nerve (CBFN) and propose a surgical technique to reduce the risk of MMN-CBFN injuries during submandibular gland (SMG) resection. Methods: 12 hemifaces from 7 low-formalin-fixed, red-blue-latex-injected cadaveric heads were dissected under 2.5×magnification using a surgical microscope. After elevation of skin-SMAS-platysma flap, a meticulous dissection was performed to expose the MMN, CBFN, facial vessels, hypoglossal nerve, masseter muscle, and SMG. All structures were mapped using relevant surgical landmarks. Results: The MMN was predominantly located (91.6%) in the 10 mm area both superior and inferior to the mandibular edge. The MMN crossed the mandibular edge 4.2±0.8 cm anterior to the mandibular angle (at the masseter’s anterior border) alongside the facial artery. The most inferior branch of the CBFN was located 3.7±0.6 cm below the mandibular edge. The MMN-CBFN consistently coursed between the layers of the investing fascia deep to the platysma. Conclusion: A surgical approach involving a skin-platysma-deep fascia flap incision placed 4 cm below the mandibular edge ensures safe exposure of the SMG while preserving both the marginal mandibular and cervical branches of the facial nerve.

🔖

Cite This Article

İsmailoğlu, A. V., Al, Ö. S., Yazı, S., İsmailoğlu, P., Aktekin, M., Şehirli, Ü. S. (2026). Minimizing nerve injury in submandibular gland resection: anatomical landmarks and a proposed safe approach. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1910902

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Cumpston E, Hohman MH, Kennedy E, Chen P. Submandibular salivary gland excision. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls 2025.
  2. Chen MK, Su CC, Tsai YL, Chang CC. Minimally invasive endoscopic resection of the submandibular gland: a new approach. Head Neck. 2006;28(11):1014-1017. doi:10.1002/hed.20469
  3. Beahm DD, Peleaz L, Nuss DW, et al. Surgical approaches to the submandibular gland: a review of literature. Int J Surg. 2009;7(6):503-509. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.09.006
  4. Hong KH, Yang YS. Surgical results of the intraoral removal of the submandibular gland. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2008; 139(4):530-534. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2008.01.008
  5. Milton CM, Thomas BM, Bickerton RC. Morbidity study of submandibular gland excision. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. May 1986;68(3):148-150.
  6. Smith WP, Peters WJ, Markus AF. Submandibular gland surgery: an audit of clinical findings, pathology and postoperative morbidity. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993;75(3):164-167.
  7. Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Morbidity associated with removal of the submandibular gland. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1992;20(5):216-219. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80318-x
  8. Chiesa Estomba C, Valldeperes-Vilanova A, González-García J, Larruscain-Sarasola E, Sistiaga-Suarez J, Altuna-Mariezcurrena X. Neurological complications and quality of life after submandibular gland resection. A prospective, non-randomized, single-centre study. Otolaryngol Pol. 2019;73(6):32-37. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0013.4120
  9. Günebakan Ç, Kuzu S, Bucak A, Kahveci OK, Ulu Ş. Transcervical submandibular gland surgery; management, outcome, and complications of 120 cases. Health Sci Q. 2022;2(1):11-15.
  10. Woltmann M, Faveri RD, Sgrott EA. Anatomosurgical study of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve for submandibular surgical approach. Braz Dent J. 2006;17(1):71-74. doi:10.1590/s0103-64402006000100016
  11. Cakmak O, Buyuklu F, Kaya KS, Babakurban ST, Bogari A, Tunalı S. Anatomical insights on the cervical nerve for contemporary face and neck lifting: a cadaveric study. Aesthet Surg J. 2024;44(8):NP532-NP539. doi:10.1093/asj/sjae111
  12. Lindsey Jr, Lee JJ, Phan HTP, Lindsey JT, Sr. Defining the cervical line in face-lift surgery: a three-dimensional study of the cervical and marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1 2023; 152(5):977-985. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000010369
  13. Lin B, Lu X, Shan X, Zhang L, Cai Z. Preoperative percutaneous nerve mapping of the mandibular marginal branch of the facial nerve. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(2):411-414. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000001408
  14. Righini CA, Petrossi J, Reyt E, Atallah I. An original submandibular approach technique sparing the cervical branch of the facial nerve. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014;131(2):143-146. doi:10.1016/ j.anorl.2013.04.003
  15. Anthony DJ, Oshan Deshanjana Basnayake BM, Mathangasinghe Y, Malalasekera AP. Preserving the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve during submandibular region surgery: a cadaveric safety study. Patient Saf Surg. 2018;12(1):23. doi:10.1186/s13037-018-0170-4
  16. Yang HM, Kim HJ, Park HW, et al. Revisiting the topographic anatomy of the marginal mandibular branch of facial nerve relating to the surgical approach. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(9):977-982. doi:10.1093/asj/sjw045
  17. Wang TM, Lin CL, Kuo KJ, Shih C. Surgical anatomy of the mandibular ramus of the facial nerve in Chinese adults. Acta Anat (Basel). 1991; 142(2):126-131. doi:10.1159/000147176
  18. Marcuzzo AV, Suran-Brunelli AN, Dal Cin E, et al. Surgical anatomy of the marginal mandibular nerve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Anat. 2020;33(5):739-750. doi:10.1002/ca.23497
  19. Roostaeian J, Rohrich RJ, Stuzin JM. Anatomical considerations to prevent facial nerve injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(5):1318-1327. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001244
  20. Cranin AN. Comparison of two submandibular incisions on the motor function of the lower lip. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1975;40(3):327-332. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(75)90414-4
  21. Diamond M, Wartmann CT, Tubbs RS, Shoja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA, Loukas M. Peripheral facial nerve communications and their clinical implications. Clin Anat. 2011;24(1):10-18. doi:10.1002/ca.21072
  22. Philippidou P, Dasen JS. Hox genes: choreographers in neural development, architects of circuit organization. Neuron. 2013;80(1):12-34. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.020
  23. Chowdhry S, Yoder EM, Cooperman RD, Yoder VR, Wilhelmi BJ. Locating the cervical motor branch of the facial nerve: anatomy and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(3):875-879. doi:10. 1097/PRS.0b013e3181e3b374
  24. Davies JC, Ravichandiran M, Agur AM, Fattah A. Evaluation of clinically relevant landmarks of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve: a three-dimensional study with application to avoiding facial nerve palsy. Clin Anat. 2016;29(2):151-156. doi:10.1002/ca.22570
  25. Ho CF, Hsin LJ, Yang SW, Tsai YT, Tsai MS, Lee YC. Postauricular incision versus conventional transcervical incision in submandibular gland excision: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2023;46(1):18-23. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.03.072
  26. de Brito Neves CP, Lira RB, Chulam TC, Kowalski LP. Retroauricular endoscope-assisted versus conventional submandibular gland excision for benign and malignant tumors. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(1):39-46. doi:10. 1007/s00464-019-07173-3