Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 5

Comprehensive analysis of fetal corpus callosum pathologies: a retrospective comparative study of agenesis and dysplasia

Özge Öztürk(ANKARA ETLİK ŞEHİR HASTANESİ)0009-0004-1134-9950
Seval Yılmaz Ergani(ANKARA ETLİK ŞEHİR HASTANESİ)0000-0002-7017-8854
Dinçer Sümer(ANKARA ETLİK ŞEHİR HASTANESİ)0000-0002-7034-6811
Kadriye Yakut Yücel(ANKARA ETLİK ŞEHİR HASTANESİ)0000-0003-3182-4312
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-11
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Comprehensive prenatal evaluation that integrates neurosonography, fetal MRI, and genetic testing is essential for accurate characterization and prognostic counseling in fetal corpus callosum anomalies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: To evaluate prenatal imaging findings, associated structural abnormalities, genetic testing results, and neonatal outcomes in fetuses with corpus callosum anomalies, and to compare corpus callosum dysplasia with agenesis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 42 pregnancies complicated by fetal corpus callosum anomalies: 24 cases of corpus callosum dysplasia and 18 cases of corpus callosum agenesis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Comprehensive prenatal evaluation that integrates neurosonography, fetal MRI, and genetic testing is essential for accurate characterization and prognostic counseling in fetal corpus callosum anomalies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Corpus callosum anomaly · fetal neurosonography · fetal MRI

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate prenatal imaging findings, associated structural abnormalities, genetic testing results, and neonatal outcomes in fetuses with corpus callosum anomalies, and to compare corpus callosum dysplasia with agenesis. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 42 pregnancies complicated by fetal corpus callosum anomalies: 24 cases of corpus callosum dysplasia and 18 cases of corpus callosum agenesis. Prenatal ultrasonographic findings, fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, invasive prenatal genetic testing results, associated structural abnormalities, and neonatal outcomes were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Associated structural abnormalities on prenatal ultrasonography were observed in 83.3% of the dysplasia group and in all fetuses in the agenesis group (p=0.122). Ventriculomegaly-related abnormalities were the most common associated findings in both groups. Colpocephaly, interhemispheric cysts, facial anomalies, and multisystem structural abnormalities were more prominent in the agenesis group. Fetal MRI findings mainly included cavum septi pellucidi abnormalities, ventriculomegaly, and colpocephaly. Prenatal genetic evaluation identified abnormalities involving genes such as L1CAM, FGFR1, and KIF7. The agenesis group had lower birth weights and higher neonatal intensive care unit admission rates compared with the dysplasia group. Conclusion: Fetuses with corpus callosum agenesis showed a tendency toward a more severe phenotypic spectrum, with more associated structural abnormalities and less favorable neonatal characteristics compared with fetuses with corpus callosum dysplasia. Comprehensive prenatal evaluation that integrates neurosonography, fetal MRI, and genetic testing is essential for accurate characterization and prognostic counseling in fetal corpus callosum anomalies.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öztürk, Ö., Ergani, S. Y., Sümer, D., Yücel, K. Y. (2026). Comprehensive analysis of fetal corpus callosum pathologies: a retrospective comparative study of agenesis and dysplasia. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 5. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1958937

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Paul LK, Brown WS, Adolphs R, et al. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(4):287-299. doi:10.1038/nrn2107
  2. Edwards TJ, Sherr EH, Barkovich AJ, Richards LJ. Clinical, genetic and imaging findings identify new causes for corpus callosum development syndromes. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 6):1579-1613. doi:10.1093/brain/awt358
  3. Glass HC, Shaw GM, Ma C, Sherr EH. Agenesis of the corpus callosum in California 1983-2003: a population-based study. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A(19):2495-2500. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32418
  4. Santo S, D'Antonio F, Homfray T, et al. Counseling in fetal medicine: agenesis of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(5): 513-521. doi:10.1002/uog.12315
  5. Volpe P, Paladini D, Resta M, et al. Characteristics, associations and outcome of partial agenesis of the corpus callosum in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27(5):509-516. doi:10.1002/uog.2774
  6. Bedeschi MF, Bonaglia MC, Grasso R, et al. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: clinical and genetic study in 63 young patients. Pediatr Neurol. 2006;34(3):186-193. doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2005.08.008
  7. Paladini D, Malinger G, Birnbaum R, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 2: performance of targeted neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(4):661-671. doi:10.1002/uog.23616 Erratum in: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(4):591. doi:10.1002/uog.26067
  8. Ghi T, Carletti A, Contro E, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of partial agenesis and hypoplasia of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(1):35-41. doi:10.1002/uog.7489
  9. Hetts SW, Sherr EH, Chao S, Gobuty S, Barkovich AJ. Anomalies of the corpus callosum: an MR analysis of the phenotypic spectrum of associated malformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(5):1343-1348. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.0146
  10. Sileo FG, Di Mascio D, Rizzo G, et al. Role of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with isolated agenesis of corpus callosum in the era of fetal neurosonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(1):7-16. doi:10.1111/aogs.13958
  11. Sun H, Li K, Wang L, et al. Fetal agenesis of the corpus callosum: clinical and genetic analysis in a series of 40 patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;298:146-152. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.05.005
  12. Mustafa HJ, Barbera JP, Sambatur EV, et al. Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in prenatal agenesis of corpus callosum: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024;63(3):312-320. doi:10.1002/uog.27440
  13. Lanzarone V, Eixarch E, Borrell A. Fetal corpus callosum anomalies: a review of underlying genetic disorders and prenatal testing options. J Ultrasound Med. 2025;44(4):637-652. doi:10.1002/jum.16639