Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 5

Clinical outcomes of mastectomy in frail or systemically untreated T4 breast cancer patients: a single-center real-world study

Mehmet Furkan Sağdıç(Ankara Etlik Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0002-3598-1625
Ferit Aydın(Ankara Etlik Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0002-1653-8150
Mahmut Onur Kültüroğlu(Ankara Etlik Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0003-2293-7139
Fatih Aslan(Ankara Etlik Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0002-0067-0085
Fırat Tekeş(Ankara Etlik Şehir Hastanesi)0009-0008-5093-7041
Özhan Albayrak(Ankara Etlik Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0002-4672-6937
Bülent Aksel(Ankara Etlik Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0002-2498-664X
Lütfi Doğan(Ankara Etlik Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0002-3834-0911
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-11
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative complications, reoperations, local recurrence, and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: The optimal management of frail patients with T4 breast cancer who are unable to tolerate standard systemic therapy remains unclear.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of mastectomy in frail patients with T4 breast cancer who were unable to receive systemic therapy using real-world data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative complications, reoperations, local recurrence, and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively evaluated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:T4 breast cancer · mastectomy · frail patient

Abstract

Aims: The optimal management of frail patients with T4 breast cancer who are unable to tolerate standard systemic therapy remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of mastectomy in frail patients with T4 breast cancer who were unable to receive systemic therapy using real-world data. Methods: This retrospective analysis of institutional records included 27 patients who underwent mastectomy for clinical T4 breast cancer at the surgical oncology department of a tertiary referral center between October 2022 and December 2025. Patients who could not receive systemic therapy because of advanced age and/or significant comorbidities, or who developed uncontrollable local complications during neoadjuvant therapy, were included. Clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative complications, reoperations, local recurrence, and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively evaluated. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The mean age was 69.6±15.9 years (median, 74 years). Surgery was performed because systemic therapy was not tolerated in 66.7% of patients, whereas 33.3% underwent surgery for local complications developing during neoadjuvant therapy. The overall postoperative complication rate was 44.4%, most commonly seroma (14.8%), surgical site infection (11.1%), and major wound dehiscence (11.1%). Reoperation was required in three patients (11.1%). Negative surgical margins were achieved in 74.1% of cases, local recurrence occurred in 11.1%, and median OS was 20.0 months (95% CI, 14.3-25.7 months). Conclusion: Mastectomy is an effective option for local control and palliation in selected frail patients with T4 breast cancer. Although postoperative complications are relatively common, most can be managed conservatively, and local recurrence rates remain low.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sağdıç, M. F., Aydın, F., Kültüroğlu, M. O., Aslan, F., Tekeş, F., Albayrak, Ö., Aksel, B., Doğan, L. (2026). Clinical outcomes of mastectomy in frail or systemically untreated T4 breast cancer patients: a single-center real-world study. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 5. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1977634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al., eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook: From the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. Springer; 2010.
  2. Hance KW, Anderson WF, Devesa SS, Young HA, Levine PH. Trends in inflammatory breast carcinoma incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program at the National Cancer Institute. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(13):966-975. doi:10.1093/jnci/dji172
  3. Robertson FM, Bondy M, Yang W, et al. Inflammatory breast cancer: the disease, the biology, the treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(6):351-375. doi:10.3322/caac.20082
  4. Dawood S, Merajver SD, Viens P, et al. International expert panel on inflammatory breast cancer: consensus statement for standardized diagnosis and treatment. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(3):515-523. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq345
  5. Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(33):4040-4046. doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.68.3573
  6. Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 88(3):553-564. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.012
  7. Kartal M, Kalaycı T, Atış V, Şentürk F, Karadeniz E, Akçay M. Toilet mastectomy: 12 year-experience of a high-volume breast surgery center.Ann Clin Anal Med. 2023;14(9):793-796. doi:10.4328/ACAM.21777
  8. Constantin A, Predescu D, Ciofu R, Achim F, Constantinoiu S. Palliative ("toilet") mammectomy, a decision-making dilemma-short review. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021;116(2):150-161. doi:10.21614/chirurgia.116.2.150
  9. Dharkar DV, Moses S. Palliative mastectomy revisited. Indian J Palliat Care. 2018;24(3):359-361. doi:10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_98_18
  10. Zihni İ, Erakın M, Bodur MS, et al. Metastatik meme kanseri hastalarında salvage mastektomi. Süleyman Demirel Univ Sağlık Bil Derg. 2022;13(1):140-145. doi:10.22312/sdusbed.1034514
  11. Abdallah A, Abdelwahab K, Awny S, et al. Fungating and ulcerating breast cancer: wound closure algorithm, complications, and survival trends. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2023;14(1):93-105. doi:10.1007/s13193-022-01602-x
  12. Sakarya MH, Fakirullahoğlu M, Yeni M. Meme kanseri nedeniyle tuvalet mastektomi uygulanan hastaların klinik özelliklerinin incelenmesi: 10 yıllık deneyim. Ağrı Tıp Fak Derg. 2023;1(1):1-4.
  13. Mamtani A, Sevilimedu V, Vincent A, Morrow M. Local recurrence is frequent after heroic mastectomy for classically inoperable breast cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(2):1043-1048. doi:10.1245/s10434-021-10764-x
  14. Hazard HW, Gorla SR, Scholtens D, Kiel K, Gradishar WJ, Khan SA. Surgical resection of the primary tumor, chest wall control, and survival in women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 2008;113(8):2011-2019. doi:10.1002/cncr.23870
  15. Badwe R, Hawaldar R, Nair N, et al. Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(13):1380-1388. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00135-7