SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Olympic Diplomacy and International Relations: Reflections from the Paris 2024 Games

Olimpiyat Diplomasisi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler: Paris 2024 Oyunlarından Yansımalar

Berkay Ayverdi(ANKARA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SPORTS SCIENCES)0000-0003-3529-7089
Gözde Algün Doğu(ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-0988-4765
Hakan Sunay(ANKARA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SPORTS SCIENCES)0000-0001-5139-1492
Ümran Başar(Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Youth and Sports)0000-0002-4468-4008
Pages
61–80
Publication Date
2025-03-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study underscores the significance of mega-events like the Olympics in shaping global diplomacy and offers a framework for future research on the interplay between sports and international relations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In today’s world, it is clear that the Olympic Games are more than just a competition; they have become an arena where countries leverage their ideological superiority, protest against others, or develop friendships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, this study aims to examine the political and diplomatic implications of the 2024 Paris Olympic Games.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study underscores the significance of mega-events like the Olympics in shaping global diplomacy and offers a framework for future research on the interplay between sports and international relations.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Olimpiyatlar · Spor Diplomasisi · Spor Politikası

Abstract

In today’s world, it is clear that the Olympic Games are more than just a competition; they have become an arena where countries leverage their ideological superiority, protest against others, or develop friendships. Each Game offers countries an opportunity to utilize the event in a manner that aligns with their goals. Therefore, this study aims to examine the political and diplomatic implications of the 2024 Paris Olympic Games. This study employs a qualitative research approach to explore the political and diplomatic implications of the 2024 Paris Olympic Games. Data were gathered through comprehensive documentary analysis of relevant literature and reports from renowned news agencies, complemented by systematic observation of the Games through live broadcasts. Content analysis was employed during the data analysis process, and the MAXQDA software was used. The analysis identified three key themes: Soft Power, Geopolitical Conflicts, and Friendship. These themes demonstrate how international sports enhance national image, foster cross-border cooperation, and address political tensions. This study underscores the significance of mega-events like the Olympics in shaping global diplomacy and offers a framework for future research on the interplay between sports and international relations.

Özet

Günümüzde Olimpiyat Oyunları, bir rekabetten çok daha fazlası haline gelmiştir. Olimpiyat Oyunları, ülkelerin ideolojik üstünlüklerini sergilediği, diğerlerine karşı protestolarını gösterdiği veya dostluklar geliştirdiği bir arena olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Oyunların her biri, ülkelerin bu etkinliği kendi hedeflerine uygun bir şekilde kullanmaları için bir fırsatlar sunmaktadır. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmanın amacı 2024 Paris Olimpiyat Oyunları’nın siyasi ve diplomatik etkilerini incelemektir. Bu çalışmada 2024 Paris Olimpiyat Oyunları’nın siyasi ve diplomatik etkilerini araştırmak için nitel nitel araştırma yaklaşımı tercih edilmiştir. Veriler doküman analizi ve gözlem yolu ile toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde temalara ayırmak için içerik analizi yöntemi tercih edilmiş ve MAXQDA yazılımından faydalanılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda üç temel tema belirlenmiştir: Yumuşak Güç, Jeopolitik Çatışmalar ve Dostluk. Ortaya çıkan bu temalar, uluslararası sporların ulusal imajı güçlendirme, uluslararası iş birliğini güçlendirme ve siyasi gerilimleri ele alma konularında etkili bir platform olabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, Olimpiyatlar gibi mega spor etkinliklerin küresel diplomasiyi şekillendirmedeki önemini yinelemekte ve spor ile uluslararası ilişkiler arasındaki etkileşimi ele alacak olan gelecekteki araştırmalar için yardımcı bir rehber olmayı hedeflemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ayverdi, B., Doğu, G. A., Sunay, H., Başar, Ü. (2025). Olympic Diplomacy and International Relations: Reflections from the Paris 2024 Games. Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 61–80. https://doi.org/10.38021/asbid.1619938

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (44)

  1. Adylbekova, B. (2024). Strategic and forward-looking strengthening of the partnership between Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan. Scientific Collection «InterConf», (194), 10-19.
  2. Akhmetkarimov, B., & Aminova, R. (2021). Sport as a tool of soft power in modern international relations. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.16.proc2.27.
  3. Algün Doğu, G. (2010). Sporun uluslararası ilişkiler açısından fonksiyonlarının değerlendirilmesi, Master's thesis, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  4. Ciesielska, M., Boström, K. W., & Öhlander, M. (2018). Observation methods. Qualitative methodologies in organization studies: Volume II: Methods and possibilities, 33-52.
  5. Dubinsky, Y. (2019). From soft power to sports diplomacy: A theoretical and conceptual discussion. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15(3), 156-164.
  6. Pigman, G. A., & Rofe, S. J. (2013). Sport and diplomacy: An introduction, Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics, DOI: 10. 1080/ 17430437. 2013. 856612
  7. Gertrud, P. (2004). Cold War Diplomats in Tracksuits: The Fräuleinwunder of East German Sport. In Militarism, Sport, Europe (pp. 226-256). Routledge.
  8. Gök, Y. (2020). Spor ve kamu diplomasisi. Spor Yayınevi. Ankara
  9. Göksu, O. (2019). Türkiye’nin ülke markasının inşası sürecinde kamu diplomasisi ekseninde sporun rolü. Uluslararası Kültürel ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(2), 403-433.
  10. Goretti, L. (2022). Sporting sanctions against Russia: Debunking the myth of sport's neutrality. Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI).
  11. Green, M., & Houlihan, B. (2005). Elite sport development: Policy learning and political priorities. Routledge.
  12. Grix, J. (2013). Sport politics and the Olympics. Political Studies Review, 11(1), 15–25.
  13. Grix, J., & Brannagan, P. M. (2024). Sportwashing and soft power: The politics of mega sporting events. Routledge.
  14. Grix, J., & Houlihan, B. (2013). Sports mega-events as part of a nation's soft power strategy: The cases of Germany (2006) and the UK (2012). The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(4), 572-596.
  15. Güleç, C. (2022). Türkiye-Ermenistan ilişkilerinin futbol diplomasisi bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. In S. Beyoğlu & G. Arslan (Eds.), Türk-Ermeni ilişkileri: Dünü, bugünü ve yarını (ss. 439-459). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  16. Hassan, A. A. M., & Wang, J. (2023). The Qatar World Cup and Twitter sentiment: Unraveling the interplay of soft power, public opinion, and media scrutiny. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 59(5), 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902231218700.
  17. Hörne, J. (2015). Sports mega-events – Three sites of contemporary political contestation. Sport in Society, 20(3), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2015.1088721.
  18. https://olympics.com/en/news/yusuf-dikec-turkish-shooting-viral-paris-2024-olympics (accessed 12 Oct 2024)
  19. https://qalampir.uz/en/news/k-irgizistonlik-bokschiga-sekundantlik-k-ilgan-uzbek-murabbiyi-tak-dirlandi- 105113 (accessed 12 Sep 2024)
  20. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/politics/azerbaijan-sends-protest-to-international-olympic-committee-over-french- state-tv-remarks/3288641 (accessed 21 Oct 2024)
  21. https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/french-foreign-policy/sports-diplomacy/
  22. https://www.euronews.com/2024/08/01/the-star-we-didnt-know-we-needed-turkish-olympic-shooter-yusuf- dikec-takes-the-internet-by (accessed 12 Oct 2024)
  23. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5672052/2024/08/01/kim-yeji-coolest-athlete-olympics-shooter/ (accessed 11 Oct 2024)
  24. IOC (2024). https://olympics.com/ioc/olympic-values (accessed 23 Aug 2024)
  25. Karayel, Z. (2024). Azerbaijan-Türkiye relations in the context of security community: One nation, two states. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 20(49), 379-396.
  26. Kobierecki, M. M. (2013). Sport in international relations: Expectations, possibilities and effects. International Studies: Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal, 15(1), 49–74.
  27. Lee, J. W. (2024). Paris 2024 turned into a platform for geopolitical contention. In D. Jackson, A. Bernstein, M. Butterworth, Y. Cho, D. S. Coombs, M. Devlin, & A. C. Vimieiro (Eds.), Olympic and Paralympic analysis 2024: Mega events, media, and the politics of sport (p. 106). Poole, England: The Centre for Comparative Politics and Media Research, Bournemouth University.
  28. Lin, C. Y., Lee, P. C., & Nai, H. F. (2008). Theorizing the role of sport in state politics. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Science, 1(1), 23-32
  29. Merkel, U. (2016). Sport as a foreign policy and diplomatic tool. In Sport and International Relations. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761930-12.
  30. Mirzayeva, N. G. (2024). The role of sports diplomacy in contemporary international relations: a case study of the olympic games. Bədən Tərbiyəsi və Idman Akademiyasının Elmi Xəbərləri, 6(3), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.28942/ssj.v6i3.801
  31. Moolakkattu, M. J. (2020). Cricket diplomacy and The India-Pakistan peace process. Peace Review, 32(4), 426– 433. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2020.1921395
  32. Murray, S., & Pigman, G. A. (2014). Mapping the relationship between international sport and diplomacy. Sport in Society, 17(9), 1098-1118.
  33. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.
  34. Nygård, H. M., & Gates, S. (2013). Soft power at home and abroad: Sport diplomacy, politics and peace-building. International Area Studies Review, 16(3), 235-243.
  35. Pigman, G. A., & Rofe, J. S. (2013). Sport and diplomacy: An introduction. Sport in Society, 17(9), 1095-1097.
  36. Qing, S. (2018). Ping-Pong diplomacy. In The Encyclopedia of Diplomacy (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118885154.dipl0473.
  37. Schneider, R. (2016). Sport as a facilitator of positive international relations. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 4(20), 843. https://doi.org/10.14486/intjscs634.
  38. Sisk, T. D. (2024). Sports in international politics: between power and peacebuilding. Rowman & Littlefield.
  39. Spaaij, Ramon (2012) Olympic rings of peace? The Olympic movement, peacemaking and intercultural understanding. Sport in Society, 15(6). pp. 761-774.
  40. Strenk, A., (1980). 2. Diplomats in track suits: The role of sports in the foreign policy of the German democratic republic. Journal of Sport & Social Issues 4(1), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/019372358000400103
  41. Tamari, T. (2024). Reconsidering Sport Diplomacy: The 2020/1 Tokyo Olympics and ‘Soft-Power.’ Asian Journal of Sport History & Culture, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/27690148.2024.2430187
  42. Voinea, A., Iacobini, A., & Dominteanu, T. (2025). Paris 2024 Olympics: A Review of Innovation, Performance and Challenges. Marathon, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.24818/mrt.24.16.02.06
  43. Yağmurlu, A. (2019). Kamu diplomasisi bakışından spor diplomasisi. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 18(4), 1367-1380.
  44. Sisk, T. D. (2024). Sports in international politics: between power and peacebuilding. Rowman & Littlefield.