SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bankacılar / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 103

The Effects of Foreıng Dırect Invesment to Investor Country: Panel Data Analysis

Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların Yatırımcı Ülke Ekonomisine Etkileri: Panel Veri Analizi

Nur AYDIN
Necmiye Cömertler ŞİMŞİR
Pages
34–56
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis it was found that there was a cointegration relationship between the series.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate effects of foreign direct investments (FDI) on the investor country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These effects were examined by panel data analysis method for 14 countries, taking 19932015 period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis it was found that there was a cointegration relationship between the series.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate effects of foreign direct investments (FDI) on the investor country. These effects were examined by panel data analysis method for 14 countries, taking 19932015 period. Panel unit root and cointegration tests taking the cross-sectional dependency were implemented in the analysis. As a result of the analysis it was found that there was a cointegration relationship between the series. According to the results of the causality test, there is a causal relationship from foreign direct investments to home economic growth, foreign trade and domestic investment. In the long run analysis, it was determined that 1 percent increases of FDI increases in economic growth by 0.29 percent, in export by 0.40 percent, in import by 0.39 percent in domestic investment by 0.34 percent

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı doğrudan yabancı yatırımların yatırımcı ülke ekonomisine etkilerini araştırmaktır. Bu etkiler, 14 ülke için 1993-2015 dönemi ele alınarak panel veri analiz yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Analizde, yatay kesit bağımılılığını dikkate alan panel birim kök ve eşbütünleşme testleri yapılmış ve seriler arasında eş bütünleme ilişkisi bulunmuştur. Nedensellik testi sonuçlarına göre, doğrudan yabancı yatırımlardan yatırımcı ülkenin ekonomik büyüme, dış ticaret ve yurt içi yatırımlarınadoğru nedensellik ilişkisi vardır. Uzun dönem analizinde ise doğrudan yabancı yatırımlardaki yüzde1'lik artışın sırasıyla ekonomik büyümeyi yüzde 0.29, ihracatı yüzde 0.40, ithalatı yüzde 0.39, yurt içi yatımları ise yüzde 0.34 oranında arttırdığı görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, N., ŞİMŞİR, N. C. (2017). The Effects of Foreıng Dırect Invesment to Investor Country: Panel Data Analysis. Bankacılar, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 103, 34–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/144495

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Albulescu, C. T. Ve Goyeau, D. (2016). The Interaction between Trade and FDI: The CEE Countries Experience. Working Papers, hal-01361954,
  2. HAL. Al-Sadig, A. J. (2013). Outward Foreign Direct Investment and Domestic Investment: The Case of Developing Countries. IMF Working Paper, Middle East and Central Asia Department, 13(52), 1- 27. Al-Shawaf, A.M.K. ve Almsafir, M. K. (2016). Economic Globalization: Role of Inward and Outward fdi with Economic Growth - Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR), 10(2), 64-74.
  3. Ameer, W., Xu, H. Ve Alotaish, M. S. M. (2017).
  4. Outward FDI, Domestic Investment and Informal Institutions: Evidence from China. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Research (IJECR), ISSN(P): 2250-0006; ISSN(E): 2319-4472, 7(1), 25-30.
  5. Apan, E. (2006). Türkiye’nin Yurt Dışına Doğrudan Yatırımları ve Türk Firmalarının Doğrudan Dış Yatırım Kararlarını Etkileyen Faktörler. Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara:
  6. Hazine Müsteşarlığı. Apergis, N. (2009). Foreign Direct Investment Inward and Outward; Evidence from Panel Data, Developed and Developing Economies, and Open and Closed Economies. The American Economist, 54, 2, 21-27.
  7. Arndt, C., Buch C. M. ve Schnitzer M. (2007). FDI and Domestic Investment: An Industry-Level View. In: Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper Series, Discussion Paper No 6464: London. Bai J. ve Ng S. (2004). A PANIC Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration. Econometrica, 72, 1127- 1178. Barba Navaratti, G. ve Castellani, D. (2004). Does Investing Abroad Affect Performance at Home? Comparing Italian Multinational and National Enterprises. CEPR Working Paper. Bayar, G. (2017). Türkiye’nin Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinden ve Dünyadan Sanayi Ürünleri İthalatı: Karşılaştırmalı Panel Veri Analizi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 17(2), 163-178.
  8. Behbehani, M. ve Al Hallaq, S. S. (2013). Impact of Home Country Outward Foreign Direct Investment on its Economic Growth: A Case of Kuwait. Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 3(03), 19-33, ISSN: 2047-2528.
  9. Beyaert, A. ve Camacho, M. (2008). TAR Panel Unit Root Tests and Real Convergence: An Application to the EU Enlargement Process. Review of Development Economics, 12(3), 668-681.
  10. Bhasin, N., Paul, J. (2016). Exports and Outward FDI: Are They Complements or Substitutes? Evidence From Asia?. Multionational Business Review, 24(1), 1-31.
  11. Breitung, J. (2005). A Parametric Approach to the Estimation of Cointegration Vectors in Panel Data. Econometric Revi