SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies / 2012 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Aile İçi Şiddetin Nesiller Arası Aktarımı: Pollak Modelinin Yeniden İncelenmesi

On Intergenerational Transmission of Domestic Violence: Pollak Revisited

ŞEVKET ALPER KOÇ
HAKKI CENK ERKİN
Pages
45–65
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, there might be a two-way relationship between the level of violence in the community and the level of violence at home.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We offer a reformulation of Pollak’s model of domestic violence by incorporating a feedback relationship between the prevalence of wife abuse in a society and men’s proclivity to violence at home and the impact of higher education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:College educated women are significantly less likely to experience domestic violence and more likely to leave abusive partners.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, there might be a two-way relationship between the level of violence in the community and the level of violence at home.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We offer a reformulation of Pollak’s model of domestic violence by incorporating a feedback relationship between the prevalence of wife abuse in a society and men’s proclivity to violence at home and the impact of higher education. College educated women are significantly less likely to experience domestic violence and more likely to leave abusive partners. Moreover, husbands might become less hesitant to act violently if physical aggression were an accepted and pervasive part of family life in a society. Therefore, there might be a two-way relationship between the level of violence in the community and the level of violence at home.

Özet

Özet Bu makalede Pollak’ın aile içi şiddetin nesiller arası aktarımı modeli iki yönde geliştiril- miştir. İlk olarak, yükseköğrenimin aile içi şiddet üzerindeki etkisi modele eklenmiştir. Aile içi şiddet üzerine yapılan çalışmalarda tutarlı olarak kadının ya da erkeğin üniversite mezunu olmasının şiddeti önemli ölçüde azalttığı bulunmuştur. İkinci olarak, erkeklerin eşlerine karşı şiddet kullanma olasılığının aile içi şiddetin toplumdaki yaygınlığı ile doğru orantılı değiştiği varsayımı üzerinde durulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇ, Ş. A., ERKİN, H. C. (2012). Aile İçi Şiddetin Nesiller Arası Aktarımı: Pollak Modelinin Yeniden İncelenmesi. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 45–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/144330

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ackerson, L.K., Kawachi I., Barbeau E.M., and Subramanian S.V. (2008). "Effects of Individual and Proximate Educational Context on Intimate Partner Violence: A Population-Based Study of Women in India," American Journal of Public Health, 98: 507-514.
  2. Aizer, A. (2010). "The Gender Wage Gap and Domestic Violence," American Economic Review, 100: 1847-1859.
  3. Altınay, A.G. and Arat, Y. (2007). Türkiye'de Kadına Yönelik Şiddet Araştırma Raporu, (Research on Violence against Women in Turkey). Ankara:
  4. Tübitak. Anderson, K. L. (2010). "Conflict, Power, and Violence in Families," Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72: 726-742.
  5. Blair Johnson, K. and Bordia Das, M. (2009). "Spousal Violence in Bangladesh as Reported by Men: Prevalence and Risk Factors," Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24: 977-995.
  6. Bloch, F. and Rao V. (2002). "Terror as a Bargaining Instrument: A Case Study of Dowry Violence in Rural India," American Economic Review, 92: 1029-1043.
  7. Bobonis, G.J., Castro R., and Brenes, M.G. (2009). "Public Transfers and Domestic Violence: The Roles of Private Information and Spousal Control," Working Paper 362, University of Toronto, Department of Economics. Bowlus, A.J. and Seitz, S. (2006). "Domestic Violence, Employment and Divorce," International Economic Review, 47: 1113-1149.
  8. Burton, B., Duvvury, N., and Varia, N. (2000).
  9. Justice, Change, and Human Rights: International Research and Responses to Domestic Violence. Washington, DC: ICRW. Carney, M., Buttell, F., and Dutton, D. (2007). "Women Who Perpetrate Intimate Partner Violence: A Review of the Literature with Recommendations for Treatment," Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12: 108-115.
  10. Cubbins, L. and Vannoy, D. (2005). "Socioeconomic Resources, Gender Traditionalism, and Wife Abuse in Urban Russian Couples," Journal of Marriage and the Family, 67: 37-52.
  11. DeRiviere, L. (2008). "Do Economists Need to Rethink their Approaches to Modeling Intimate Partner Violence?," Journal of Economic Issues, 42: 583-606.
  12. Dutton, D.G. (2006). Rethinking Domestic Violence. UBC Press:
  13. Vancouver. Edleson, J.L. (1999). "The Overlap between Child Maltreatment and Woman Battering," Violence Against Women, 5: 134-154.
  14. Ehrensaft, M.K., Cohen, P., Brown J., Smailes, E., Chen, H., and Johnson, J. (2003). "Intergenerational Transmission of Partner Violence: A 20-Year Prospective Study," Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71: 741-753.
  15. Ellsberg M., Heise, L., Pena, R., Agurto, S., and Winkwist, A. (2001). "Researching Domest