Journals / ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3

Anterior Mandibular Reconstruction by Autogenous Bone Graft Harvested With Piezoelektric Surgery

Piezoelektrik Cerrahi Yöntemiyle Elde Edilen Otojen Kemik Grefti İle Anterior Mandibula Rekonstrüksiyonu

Pages
929–933
Publication Date
2011-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this case, anterior mandibular reconstruction with piezoelectric surgery is described and advantages over conventional methods are discussed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Autogeneous bone grafts have been used as a gold standard in reconstruction of the mandibular defects in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bone grafts obtained from the ascending mandibular ramus have been used successfully in many clinical cases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this case, anterior mandibular reconstruction with piezoelectric surgery is described and advantages over conventional methods are discussed
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Diş implantları · kemik transplantasyonu · Yara iyileşmesi

Abstract

Autogeneous bone grafts have been used as a gold standard in reconstruction of the mandibular defects in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Bone grafts obtained from the ascending mandibular ramus have been used successfully in many clinical cases. Piezoelectric surgery is a new and innovative technique enabling to obtain safe and effective osteotomies in anatomically diffucult areas by preserving the soft tissues like vessels, nerves and periosteum by using piezoelectric ultrasonic vibrations. In this case, anterior mandibular reconstruction with piezoelectric surgery is described and advantages over conventional methods are discussed

Özet

Oral ve maksillofasiyal cerrahi alanında otojen kemik greftleri yıllardır maksiller ve mandibuler defektlerin rekonstrüksiyonunda altın standart olarak kabul edilmektedir. Mandibuler yükselen ramustan elde edilen kemik greftleri bir çok klinik durumda başarı ile kullanılmaktadır. Piezoelektrik cerrahi, piezoelektrik ultrasonik titreşimler kullanarak anatomik olarak zor bölgelerde damarlar, sinirler ve periost gibi yumuşak dokuları koruyarak güvenli ve etkili osteotomiler yapılmasını sağlayan yeni bir tekniktir. Bu vakada piezoelektrik cerrahi ile mandibular ramus blok grefti elde edilmesi yöntemiyle anterior mandibula rekonstrüksiyonu gösterilmiş ve geleneksel yöntemlere göre avantajları ortaya konmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

Denizci, S., Değerliyurt, K., Şimşek, B. (2011). Anterior Mandibular Reconstruction by Autogenous Bone Graft Harvested With Piezoelektric Surgery. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 929–933. https://ajindex.com/articles/1440651

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Garg AK, Morales MJ, Navarro I, Duarte F. Au- togenous mandibular bone grafts in the treatment of the resorbed maxillary anterior alveolar ridge: rationale and approach. Implant Dent. 7:169- 176, 1998
  2. Pikos MA. Block autografts for localized ridge augmentation: Part II. The posterior mandible. Implant Dent. 9:67-75, 2000
  3. Misch CM, Misch CE, Resnik RR, Ismail YH. Re- construction of maxillary alveolar defects with mandibular symphysis grafts for dental implants: a preliminary procedural report. Int. J. Oral Ma- xillofac. Implants. 7:360-366, 1992
  4. Aktaş ÜKA. The Use of the Grafts in Dental Implants. Turkiye Klinikleri J. Dental. Sci. 1:23-30, 2010
  5. Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 12: 767-776, 1997
  6. Veis AA, Tsirlis AT, Parisis NA. Effect of autoge- nous harvest site location on the outcome of ridge augmentation for implant dehiscences. Int. J. Peri- odontics Restorative Dent. 24:155-163, 2004
  7. Schwartz-Arad D, Levin L. Multitier technique for bone augmentation using intraoral autogenous bone blocks. Implant Dent. 16:5-12, 2007
  8. Schaller BJ, Gruber R, Merten HA, Kruschat T, Schliephake H, Buchfelder M, et al. Piezoelectric bone surgery: a revolutionary technique for mini- mally invasive surgery in cranial base and spinal surgery? Technical note. Neurosurgery 57:E410; discussion E10, 2005
  9. Gruber RM, Kramer FJ, Merten HA, Schliephake H. Ultrasonic surgery--an alternative way in ort- hognathic surgery of the mandible. A pilot study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 34:590-593, 2005
  10. Robiony M, Polini F, Costa F, Vercellotti T, Po- liti M. Piezoelectric bone cutting in multipiece maxillary osteotomies. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 62:759-761, 2004
  11. Happe A. Use of a piezoelectric surgical device to harvest bone grafts from the mandibular ramus: report of 40 cases. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 27:241-249, 2007
  12. Schlee M, Steigmann M, Bratu E, Garg AK. Pie- zosurgery: basics and possibilities. Implant Dent. 15:334-340, 2006
  13. Leclercq P, Zenati C, Dohan DM. Ultrasonic bone cut part 2: State-of-the-art specific clinical applicati- ons. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 66:183-188, 2008
  14. Vercellotti T, Nevins M, Kim D, Nevins M, Wada K, Schenk R, et al. Osseous response following resective therapy with piezosurgery. Int. J. Perio- dontics Restorative Dent. 26:543-549, 2005
  15. Aro H, Kallioniemi H, Aho AJ, Kellokumpu- Lehtinen P. Ultrasonic device in bone cutting. A histological and scanning electron microscopical study. Acta Orthop. Scand. 52:5-10, 1981
  16. Chiriac G, Herten M, Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Becker J. Autogenous bone chips: influence of a new piezoelectric device (Piezosurgery) on chip morphology, cell viability and differentiation. J. Clin. Periodontol. 32:994-999, 2005
  17. Hoigne DJ, Stubinger S, Von Kaenel O, Shamda- sani S, Hasenboehler P. Piezoelectric osteotomy in hand surgery: first experiences with a new tech- nique. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 7:36, 2006
  18. Landes CA, Stubinger S, Laudemann K, Rieger J, Sader R. Bone harvesting at the anterior iliac crest using piezoosteotomy versus conventional open harvesting: a pilot study. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 105:e19- 28, 2008
  19. Labanca M, Azzola F, Vinci R, Rodella LF. Piezo- electric surgery: twenty years of use. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 46:265-269, 2008
  20. Salami A, Vercellotti T, Mora R, Dellepiane M. Pi- ezoelectric bone surgery in otologic surgery. Oto- laryngol. Head Neck Surg. 136:484-485, 2007
  21. Vercellotti T, De Paoli S, Nevins M. The piezoe- lectric bony window osteotomy and sinus memb- rane elevation: introduction of a new technique for simplification of the sinus augmentation procedure. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 21:561-567, 2001
  22. Robiony M, Polini F, Costa F, Zerman N, Politi M. Ultrasonic bone cutting for surgically assis- ted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) under local anaesthesia. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 36:267-269, 2007
  23. Sortino F, Pedulla E, Masoli V. The piezoelectric and rotatory osteotomy technique in impacted third molar surgery: comparison of postoperati- ve recovery. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 66:2444- 2448, 2008
  24. Robiony M, Polini F, Costa F, Toro C, Politi M. Ultrasound piezoelectric vibrations to perform osteotomies in rhinoplasty. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 65:1035-1038, 2007
  25. Turra M, Bertossi D, Bissolotti G, Anesi A, Chiari- ni L. Genioplasty with piezosurgery. J. Cranioma- xillofac. Surg. 36:S24, 2008
  26. Dr. m. Kağan Değerliyurt
  27. Dentistanbul Diş Hastanesi, Yıldız Caddesi No:71, Beşiktaş, İstanbul
  28. Tel: 0212 583 44 40 • E-posta: [email protected]
  29. Pikos MA. Block autografts for localized ridge augmentation: Part II. The posterior mandible. Implant Dent. 9:67-75, 2000
  30. Misch CM, Misch CE, Resnik RR, Ismail YH. Re- construction of maxillary alveolar defects with mandibular symphysis grafts for dental implants: a preliminary procedural report. Int. J. Oral Ma- xillofac. Implants. 7:360-366, 1992
  31. Aktaş ÜKA. The Use of the Grafts in Dental Implants. Turkiye Klinikleri J. Dental. Sci. 1:23-30, 2010
  32. Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 12: 767-776, 1997