SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Assessment of Hard Tissue Density Around Dental Implants

Dental İmplantlar Çevresi Kemik Yoğunluğunun Değerlendirilmesi

Wael Alshaibani(GAZI UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY)0000-0002-9638-5384
Nur Mollaoğlu(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, KLİNİK BİLİMLER BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0003-2686-2955
Pages
35–41
Publication Date
2021-01-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Introduction: The aim of this study to analyse the post surgical bone resorption around dental implants using two different radiographic techniques.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The aim of this study to analyse the post surgical bone resorption around dental implants using two different radiographic techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Introduction: The aim of this study to analyse the post surgical bone resorption around dental implants using two different radiographic techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Introduction: The aim of this study to analyse the post surgical bone resorption around dental implants using two different radiographic techniques.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:GaAlAs lazer · Flep · İmplant

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study to analyse the post surgical bone resorption around dental implants using two different radiographic techniques.

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışmanın amacı, dental implantlar çevresindeki sert doku değişikliklerini iki farklı radyolojik görüntüleme tekniği kullanarak analiz etmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alshaibani, W., Mollaoğlu, N. (2021). Assessment of Hard Tissue Density Around Dental Implants. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 35–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/1440558

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Cai H, Liang X, Sun DY, Chen JY. Long-term clinical performance of flapless implant surgery compared to the conventional approach with flap elevation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2020;26:8:1087–103.
  2. Llamas-Monteagudo O, Girbés-Ballester P, Viña-Almunia J, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Clinical parameters of implants placed in healed sites using flapped and flapless techniques: A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2017;22:e572–e81.
  3. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Flapless versus Conventional Flapped Dental Implant Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. PLOS One 2014;9:e100624.
  4. Matys J, Świder K, Grzech-Leśniak K, Dominiak M, Romeo U. Photobiomodulation by a 635nm Diode Laser on Peri-Implant Bone: Primary and Secondary Stability and Bone Density Analysis-A Randomized Clinical Trial. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:2785302.
  5. Khadra M, Ronold HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE, Haanaes HR. Low-level laser therapy stimulates bone-implant interaction:an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:325–32.
  6. Kim YD, Kim SS, Hwang DS, Kim SG, Kwon YH, Shin SH, et al. Effect of low level laser treatment after installation of dental titanium implant-immunohistochemical study of RANKL, RANK, OPG: An experimental study in rats. Lasers Surg Med 2007;39:441-50.
  7. Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Schicho K, Figi M, Enislidis G. Navigated flapless transmucosal implant placement in the mandible: A pilot study in 20 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:801-7.
  8. Shahidi S, Zamiri B, Abolvardi M, Akhlaghian M, Paknahad M. Comparison of Dental Panoramic Radiography and CBCT for Measuring Vertical Bone Height in Different Horizontal Locations of Posterior Mandibular Alveolar Process. J Dent 2018;19:83–91.
  9. Becker W, Goldstein M, Beker BE, Sennerby L. Minimally invasive flapless implant surgery: A prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7,S21-7.
  10. Blanco J, Nunez V, Aracil J, Munoz F, Ramos I. Ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in the dog: flap versus flapless surgery. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:640-8.
  11. Fortin T, Bosson JL, Isidori M, Blanchet E. Effect of flapless surgery on pain experienced in implant placement using an imageguided system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:298-304.
  12. Van de Velde T, Glor F, De Bruyn H. A model study on flapless implant placement by clinicians with a different experience level in implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:66-72.
  13. You TM, Choi BH, Li J, Xuan F, Jeong SM, Jang SO. Morphogenesis of the peri-implant mucosa: a comparison between flap and flapless procedures in the canine mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:66-70.
  14. Nagarajan A, Perumalsamy R, Thyagarajan R, Namasivayam A. Diagnostic Imaging for Dental Implant Therapy. J Clin Imaging Sci 2014;4:4.
  15. Zechner W, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Busenlechner D, Tepper G, Watzek G. Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:873-8.
  16. Kullman L, Al Asfour A, Zetterqvist L, Andersson L. Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:96-100.