SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3

Evaluation of the Quality and Usefulness of YouTube Videos on Early Childhood Caries

Erken Çocukluk Çağı Çürükleri ile İlgili Youtube Videolarının Kalitesinin ve Yararlılıklarının Değerlendirilmesi

Seray Şahin(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.)0009-0000-3691-5876
Betül Şen Yavuz(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.)0000-0002-7561-8396
Pages
528–536
Publication Date
2024-09-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: While the usefulness of videos did not vary based on the source or speaker, videos uploaded by specialists had higher quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aimed to compare videos on early childhood caries (ECC) uploaded by dentists and specialists on YouTube™.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The term 'early childhood caries' was searched on YouTube and 36 videos in Turkish with acceptable video quality were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: While the usefulness of videos did not vary based on the source or speaker, videos uploaded by specialists had higher quality.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Erken Çocukluk Çağı Çürükleri · İnternet · Video Kalitesi

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to compare videos on early childhood caries (ECC) uploaded by dentists and specialists on YouTube™. Material and Method: The term 'early childhood caries' was searched on YouTube and 36 videos in Turkish with acceptable video quality were analyzed. The individuals uploading the videos (sources) were categorized as dentists or others, while speakers were categorized as dentists or specialists. Interaction index and viewing rates were calculated. The quality and usefulness of the videos were assessed using Video Information and the Video Quality Index (VIQI) and 13 usefulness criteria. Results: The interaction index (p=0.176, p=0.591, respectively) and viewing rate (p=0.147, p=0.780) of the videos did not show statistical differences based on the source and speaker. While the video quality was not affected by the source (p=0.633), videos presented by specialist dentists had significantly higher total VIQI scores (p=0.018), information accuracy (p<0.001), and precision (p=0.042) sub-scores. There was no significant difference in the usefulness of videos uploaded by dentists (4.54±2.17) and other sources (5.67±2.67) (p=0.183). Furthermore, there was no difference in the usefulness of videos uploaded by dentists (4.18±2.64) and specialists (4.74±1.63) (p=0.538). Conclusion: While the usefulness of videos did not vary based on the source or speaker, videos uploaded by specialists had higher quality.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma diş hekimleri ve uzmanlar tarafından yüklenen YoutubeTM’daki erken çocukluk çağı çürükleri (EÇÇ) hakkındaki videoları karşılaştırmayı amaçladı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Youtube’da ‘erken çocukluk çağı çürükleri’ terimi arandı ve Türkçe dilinde olan kabul edilebilir video kalitesinde olan 36 video analiz edildi. Videoları yükleyen kişiler yani video kaynakları diş hekimi ve diğer olarak; video sunucuları ise diş hekimi ve uzman olarak kaydedildi. Etkileşim indeksleri ve izlenme oranları hesaplandı. Videoların kalitesi ve yararlılıkları Video Bilgisi ve Kalite İndeksi (VIQI) ve 13 yararlılık kriteri ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Videoların etkileşim indeksi (sırasıyla p=0.176, p=0.591) ve görüntülenme oranı (sırasıyla p=0.147, p=0.780) video kaynağı ve video sunucusuna göre istatistiksel olarak farklılık göstermedi. Video kalitesi video kaynağından etkilenmezken (p=0.633), sunucusu uzman diş hekimleri olan videoların toplam VIQI skoru (p=0.018), bilgi doğrulu (p<0.001) ve kesinlik (p=0.042) alt skorları uzmanlar tarafından yüklenen videolarda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha fazlaydı. Diş hekimleri (4.54±2.17) ve diğer video kaynakları (5.67±2.67) tarafından yüklenen videoların yararlılıkları arasında fark gözlenmedi (p=0.183). Ayrıca diş hekimleri (4.18±2.64) ve uzmanlar (4.74±1.63) tarafından yüklenen videoların yararlılıkları da farklılık göstermedi (p=0.538). Sonuç: Video yararlılıkları video kaynağı veya sunucusuna göre değişiklik göstermezken, uzmanlar tarafından yüklenen videoların kalitesi daha yüksekti.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şahin, S., Yavuz, B. Ş. (2024). Evaluation of the Quality and Usefulness of YouTube Videos on Early Childhood Caries. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3, 528–536. https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1402175

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Definition of early childhood caries (ECC). [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2023 Dec 6]. Available from: http://www.aapd.org/assets/1/7/D_ECC.pdf
  2. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on infant oral health care. Reference Manual [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2023 Dec 6]: [about 141–5 p.] Available from: https://www.aapd.org/assets/1/7/g_infantoralhealthcare.pdf
  3. Kuşgöz A, Aydınoğlu S. Erken çocukluk çağı çürükleri ve etiyolojisi: Güncel literatür derlemesi. Selcuk Dent J 2016;3:39–47.
  4. Feitosa S, Colares V, Pinkham J. The psychosocial effects of severe caries in 4-year-old children in recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 2005;21:1550–6.
  5. Petersen PE. Global policy for improvement of oral health in the 21st century – implications to oral health research of world health assembly 2007, World Health Organization. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2009;37:1–8.
  6. Watt RG. Strategies and approaches in oral disease prevention and health promotion. Bull World Health Organ 2005;83:711–8.
  7. Selvi S, Kavaloğlu Çıldır Ş, Sandallı N. Erken çocukluk dönemi çürükleri: Etiyolojisi, epidemiyolojisi, koruyucu yaklaşımlar ve tedavisi. 7tepe Klinik 2008;1:48–55.
  8. Hons YGBA. Do they listen? Review of information retained by patients following consent for reduction mammoplasty. Br J Plast Surg 2000;53:121–5.
  9. Kessels R. Patients’ memory for medical information. J R Soc Med 2003;96:219–22.
  10. Carlsson M. Cancer patients seeking information from sources outside the health care system. Support Care Cancer 2000;8:453–7.
  11. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri (BT) kullanım araştırması, 2022. [Internet] [cited 2023 Sep 20]. Available from: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2022-45587
  12. Duman C. Youtube™ quality as a source for parent education about the oral hygiene of children. Int J Dent Hyg 2020;18:261–7.
  13. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. You-Tube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis 2016;22:202–8.
  14. Elkarmi R, Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Scully C. Youtube as a source for parents’ education on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017;27:437–43.
  15. Nagpal SJS, Karimianpour A, Mukhija D, Mohan D, Brateanu A. Youtube videos as a source of medical information during the Ebola hemorrhagic fever epidemic. Springerplus 2015;4:1–5.
  16. Prabhu J, Somasundaram A. Detection of exudates for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Int J Innov Appl Stud 2013;3,116–20.
  17. Alrouh H, Elsje Van B, Eveline De Z, Conor D, Dorret IB. Intergenerational transmission of body mass index and associations with educational attainment. BMC Public Health 2022;22:890–901.
  18. Meyer F, Karch A, Schlinkmann K. Sociodemographic determinants of spatial disparities in early childhood caries: An ecological analysis in Braunschweig, Germany. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2017;45;442–8.
  19. Bodrumlu, EH, Avşar A. Erken çocukluk dönemi çürükleri. GÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2011;28:131–9.
  20. Güçyetmez TB, Tıraş M, Tanrıkulu A. Assessment of YoutubeTM videos as a parent ınformation source for teething symptoms. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2022;25:114–8.
  21. Mustuloğlu Ş. Çocuklarda diş fırçalama ile ilgili youtube videolarının içeriklerinin bir kaynak olarak değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dent J 2022;9:825–30.
  22. Yağcı F. Dijital diş hekimliği hakkında bilgi kaynağı olarak YoutubeTM’un değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dent J 2021;8:296–302.
  23. Abukaraky A, Hamdan AA, Ameera MN, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YoutubeTM videos on dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2018;23:463–8.
  24. Ho A, McGrath C, Mattheos N. Social media patient testimonials in implant dentistry: Information or misinformation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:791–0.
  25. Menziletoglu D, Guler AY, Isik BK. Are Youtube videos related to dental implant useful for patient education. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;121:661–4.
  26. Öztürk G, Gümüş H. Çocuklarda genel anestezi altında uygulanan diş tedavileri ile ilgili Youtube™ videolarının içerik analizi. Selcuk Dent J 2021;8:140–7.
  27. Li M, Yan S, Yang D, Li B. Youtube™ as a source of information on food poisoning. BMC Public Health 2019;19:952–8.
  28. Gökkaya B. Koruyucu flor uygulamaları ile ilgili Türkçe Youtube videolarının içerik değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif çalışma. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 2022;28:356–62.
  29. Kanasi E, Dewhirst FE, Chalmers NE, Kent R, Moore A, Hughes C, et al. Clonal analysis of the microbiota of severe early childhood caries. Caries Res 2010;44:485–97.
  30. Li Y, Tanner A. Effect of antimicrobial interventions on the oral microbiota associated with early childhood caries. Pediatr Dent 2015;37:226–44.