SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Evaluation of the effect of anterior aesthetic restorations on the quality of life

Anterior estetik restorasyonların yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi

Derya Surmelioglu(Gaziantep Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı)0000-0002-6034-3131
Halime Kolsuz(Gaziantep Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı)0000-0001-5068-5720
Sevim Atılan Yavuz(Gaziantep Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı)0000-0002-6192-4931
Zeynep Çifçi(Gaziantep Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı)0000-0002-3116-8987
Mehmet Durdu(Gaziantep Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı)0000-0003-1175-8741
Zeynep Güngörmüş(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-3761-8184
Pages
132–139
Publication Date
2020-08-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Anterior esthetic restorations, has provided a positive impact on people's quality of life in the long term.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of aesthetic restorations on the quality of life of the patients using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The OHIP-14 scale was administered to the aesthetically rehabilitated patients before, after immediately and 1, 6 months after the treatment and scores were obtained.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Anterior esthetic restorations, has provided a positive impact on people's quality of life in the long term.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Estetik restorasyon · OHIP-14 · Yaşam kalitesi ölçeği

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of aesthetic restorations on the quality of life of the patients using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) scale. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients who applied to the Restorative Dentistry Department of Gaziantep University Faculty of Dentistry with aesthetic complaints in the anterior region were included in the study. The OHIP-14 scale was administered to the aesthetically rehabilitated patients before, after immediately and 1, 6 months after the treatment and scores were obtained. Data were evaluated by two-way repeated analysis of variance and Friedmann, Willcoxon tests. Results: As a result of evaluating the total scores of the whole OHIP-14 scale, a significant difference was found between the data obtained before treatment and immediately after treatment, at 1 month and 6 months ( p <0.05). There was a significant difference between the data obtained after all treatment ( p <0.05). Conclusion: Anterior esthetic restorations, has provided a positive impact on people's quality of life in the long term.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı anterior bölgede yapılan estetik restorasyonların hastaların yaşam kalitesi üzerine olan etkisinin Ağız Sağlığı Etki Profili (Oral Health Impact Profile, OHIP-14) ölçeği ile değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Gaziantep Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı kliniğine anterior bölgedeki estetik şikayetleri sebebi ile başvuran 60 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Estetik olarak rehabilite edilen hastalara OHIP-14 ölçeği tedaviden önce, tedaviden hemen sonra ve 1, 6 ay sonrası uygulanmış elde edilen skorlar çift tekrarlayan ölçümlü varyans analizi ve Friedmann, ikili karşılaştırma Willcoxon testi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Tüm OHIP-14 ölçek toplam skorlarının değerlendirilmesi sonucu, tedavi öncesi elde edilen veriler ile tedaviden hemen sonra, 1. ay ve 6. ay sonra elde edilen veriler arasında anlamlı farklılık bulundu ( p <0,05). Yine tüm tedavi sonrası elde edilen veriler arasında da anlamlı farklılık vardı ( p <0,05). Sonuç: Anterior estetik restorasyonlar uzun dönemde, kişilerin yaşam kalitesi üzerine pozitif yönde etki sağlamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Surmelioglu, D., Kolsuz, H., Yavuz, S. A., Çifçi, Z., Durdu, M., Güngörmüş, Z. (2020). Evaluation of the effect of anterior aesthetic restorations on the quality of life. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 132–139. https://doi.org/10.30569/adiyamansaglik.661009

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Adwere-Boamah J, Curtis DA. A confirmatory factor analysis of a four-factor model of adolescent concerns revisited. Journal of youth and adolescence. 1993;22(3):297-312.
  2. Robertson A, Norén JG. Subjective Aspects of Patients with Traumatized Teeth A 15-Year Follow-Up Study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1997;55(3):142-147.
  3. Synnott A. Truth and goodness, mirrors and masks--Part I: A sociology of beauty and the face. The British Journal of Sociology. 1989;40(4):607-636.
  4. Baldwin DC. Appearance and aesthetics in oral health. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology. 1980;8(5):244-256.
  5. Marcenes W, Ryda U. Socio-psychological aspects of traumatic dental injuries. Traumatic Injuries to the Teeth. 2007.
  6. Kuyken W. The World Health Organisation quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organisation. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1409-1409.
  7. Ersu B, Canay Ş, Akman S. İmplant destekli overdenture ve konvansiyonel tam profitez kullanımının yaşam kalitesine etkisi. SÜ Dişhek Fak Derg. 2007;16(3):39-43.
  8. Allen PF. Assessment of oral health related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life outcomes. 2003;1(1):40.
  9. Nuttall N, Steele J, Pine C, White D, Pitts N. Adult dental health survey: The impact of oral health on people in the UK in 1998. British Dental Journal. 2001;190(3):121.
  10. Cibirka RM, Razzoog M, Lang BR. Critical evaluation of patient responses to dental implant therapy. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1997;78(6):574-581.
  11. Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the oral health impact profile. Community dental health. 1994;11(1):3-11.
  12. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short‐form oral health impact profile. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology. 1997;25(4):284-290.
  13. Mumcu G, Inanc N, Ergun T, et al. Oral health related quality of life is affected by disease activity in Behçet's disease. Oral diseases. 2006;12(2):145-151.
  14. Preciado A, Del Río J, Suárez-García M-J, Montero J, Lynch CD, Castillo-Oyagüe R. Differences in impact of patient and prosthetic characteristics on oral health-related quality of life among implant-retained overdenture wearers. Journal of Dentistry. 2012;40(10):857-865.
  15. Alkhatib M, Holt R, Bedi R. Prevalence of self-assessed tooth discolouration in the United Kingdom. Journal of dentistry. 2004;32(7):561-566.
  16. Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2005;83:661-669.
  17. Bäckman B, Holm AK. Amelogenesis imperfecta: prevalence and incidence in a northern Swedish county. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology. 1986;14(1):43-47.
  18. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operatıve Dentıstry-Unıversıty of Washıngton-. 2004;29:481-508.
  19. Macedo G, Raj V, Ritter AV, Swift Jr EJ. Longevity of anterior composite restorations. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2006;18(6):310-311.
  20. Tuncer D. Direkt Estetik Restorasyonlar. Turkiye Klinikleri Restorative Dentistry-Special Topics. 2017;3(2):66-75.
  21. Croll TP, Cavanaugh RR. Augmentation of incisor width with bonded composite resin: another look. Quintessence International. 1990;21(8).
  22. Wallander JL, Schmitt M, Koot HM. Quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: issues, instruments, and applications. Journal of clinical psychology. 2001;57(4):571-585.
  23. Dolan TA. Identification of appropriate outcomes for an aging population. Special care in Dentistry. 1993;13(1):35-39.
  24. Slade GD. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill. 1997;3.