SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Colloquium Anatolicum / 2017 / Sayı: 16

Arkeoloji, Etmen-Temelli Modeller ve Simülasyonlar

Bülent ARIKAN
Pages
5–11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The expansion of this new research method among archaeologists will allow for a more accurate interpretation of data from a wider perspective while enabling a larger segment of society to make use of research results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The most significant development in social sciences during the last three decades has been the use of mathematical equations to express the relationships among data.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Another significant contribution of modeling is the exploration of coupled socio-ecological systems at different spatio-temporal scales.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The expansion of this new research method among archaeologists will allow for a more accurate interpretation of data from a wider perspective while enabling a larger segment of society to make use of research results.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anadolu arkeolojisi · süreçsel arkeoloji · modelleme

Abstract

The most significant development in social sciences during the last three decades has been the use of mathematical equations to express the relationships among data. While such relationships are used to build models and run simulations, it is also possible to test hypotheses statistically. The emergent scientific syntheses have solid scientific foundations and present the opportunity to assess several dynamics together. Archaeology witnesses interdisciplinary research. The use of equations and algorithms, testing the adaptive behavior of human societies under different conditions are only possible through agent-based modeling. Consequently, the cycle of observation-hypothesis-testing can be established in archaeology. Another significant contribution of modeling is the exploration of coupled socio-ecological systems at different spatio-temporal scales. The expansion of this new research method among archaeologists will allow for a more accurate interpretation of data from a wider perspective while enabling a larger segment of society to make use of research results.

Özet

Sosyal bilimlerde son otuz yıldır süregelen değişimlerden en önemlisi, farklı alanlardan araştırmacıların çalışmasıyla çıkan verilerin birlikte değerlendirilmesi, bu verilerin matematiksel denklemlerle ifade edilmesidir. Veriler arasındaki ilişkilerle bir model kurulur ve simülasyonlar hazırlanırken, hipotezler istatiksel olarak test edilebilmektedir. Sonuçta ortaya çıkan sentezler bilimsel olarak daha sağlam temellere otururken, birden fazla dinamiği birlikte değerlendirme imkanı da sunmaktadır. Arkeoloji farklı bilimsel alanlardan gelen insanların ortak çalışmalarına sahne olmaktadır. Verilerin sayısallaştırılması, ilişkilerin matematiksel denklemler ve algoritmalarla ifade edilmesi ve farklı şartlar altında insan topluluklarının adaptasyona yönelik davranışlarının test edilmesi ancak etmen-temelli modeller ile mümkün olmaktadır. Böylece arkeolojide gözlem-hipotez-test döngüsü kurulmaktadır. Bu modellerin daha önemli

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIKAN, B. (2017). Arkeoloji, Etmen-Temelli Modeller ve Simülasyonlar. Colloquium Anatolicum, Sayı: 16, 5–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/143692

References (14)

  1. Arıkan, B. 2014 “Modeling the Paleoclimate (ca. 6000-3200 cal BP) in Eastern Anatolia: The Method of Macrophysical Climate Model and Comparisons with Proxy Data”, Journal of Archaeological Science 57: 158-167.
  2. Arıkan, B. – F. Balossi – A. Massi 2016 “Comparative Modeling of Bronze Age Land Use in the Malatya Plain (Turkey)”, Quaternary Science Reviews 136: 122-133.
  3. Arıkan, B. – F. Balossi – A. Massi 2017 “Crisis in the Highlands. Agent-based Modeling of the Earlky Bronze Age-I (ca. 4950-4700 cal. BP) Socio-economic Transformations at Arslantepe (Eastern Anatolia)”, T. Cunningham – J. Driessen (eds.), Crisis to Collapse. The Archaeology of Societal Breakdown, AEGIS 11, UCPress Louvain: 235-250
  4. Barton, C. M. – I. I. T. Ullah – S. Bergin 2010a “Land use, Water, and Mediterranean Landscapes: Modeling Long-term Dynamics of Complex Socio-ecological Systems”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: 5275-5297.
  5. Barton, C. M. – I. I. T. Ullah – H. Mitasova 2010b “Computational modeling and socioecological dynamics in the Neolithic of Southwest Asia”, American Antiquity 75 (2): 364-386.
  6. Barton, C. M. – I. I. T. Ullah v – A. Heimsath 2015 “How to Make a Barranco: Modeling Erosion and Land-use in Mediterranean Landscapes”, Land 4 (3): 578-606.
  7. Binford, L. R. 1962 “Archaeology as Anthropology”, M. Leone (ed.) Contemporary Archaeology, Southern Illinois University: 93-101.
  8. Binford, L. R. 1965 “Archaeological Systematics and the Study of Culture Process”, M. Leone (ed.) Contemporary Archaeology, Southern Illinois University: 125-132. Binford S. – L. R. Binford 1968
  9. New Perspectives in Archaeology, Chicago. Braudel, F. 1972 The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II (2 vol.s), Los Angeles. Costopoulos, A. – M. W. Lake (eds.), 2010 Archaeological Simulation: Into the 21st Century, Utah. Fontana, W. – P. Schuster 1997 “Continuity in Evolution: On the Nature of Transitions”, Science 280 (5368): 1451-1455.
  10. Gunderson, L. H. 2000 “Ecological Resilience – In Theory and Application”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 425-439.
  11. Holling, C. S. 1973 “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1-23.
  12. Kohler, T. – G. Gumerman (eds.) 1999 Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies, New York. Kamp, K. 2000 “From Village to Tell: Household Ethnoarchaeology in Syria”, Near Eastern Archaeology 63 (2): 84-93.
  13. Kramer, C. 1982
  14. Village Ethnoarchaeology, New York. Lake, M. W. 2015 “Explaining the Past w