SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Biyolojik Mücadele Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Effectiveness of four Turkish entomopathogenic nematode isolates against Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) pupae at different temperatures

Dört yerel entomopatojen nematod türünün farklı sıcaklıklarda Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) pupaları üzerindeki etkinliği

Ayşenur Yılmaz(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-3873-6537
Taylan Çakmak(DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4151-5724
Uğur Gözel(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1363-1189
Pages
21–28
Publication Date
2024-07-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The highest infection rate was observed forH. bacteriophora/91 isolate at 25 °C, and the lowest infection rate was observed for S. feltiae/12 isolate at 10 °C.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Türkiye, is the country of origin of the olive tree and is among the world’s leading olive producers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Most of the olive production in Türkiye is concentrated in Izmir, Aydın, Çanakkale, Balıkesir, Muğla and Bursa Provinces.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The highest infection rate was observed forH. bacteriophora/91 isolate at 25 °C, and the lowest infection rate was observed for S. feltiae/12 isolate at 10 °C.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bactrocera oleae · Steinernema feltiae · Steinernema carpocapsae

Abstract

Türkiye, is the country of origin of the olive tree and is among the world’s leading olive producers. Most of the olive production in Türkiye is concentrated in Izmir, Aydın, Çanakkale, Balıkesir, Muğla and Bursa Provinces. Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae), being one of the main pests of olive trees, is an important problem in olive cultivation in Türkiye. The efficacy of four Turkish populations of entomopathogenic nematodes against B. oleae pupae was determined under laboratory conditions. They were Steinernema feltiae/12, S. carpocapsae/1133, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora/70, H. bacteriophora/91, which were collected in different regions of Türkiye during our earlier studies. They were tested against the pest by using a single dose at 5 different temperatures (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 °C). The highest infection rate was observed forH. bacteriophora/91 isolate at 25 °C, and the lowest infection rate was observed for S. feltiae/12 isolate at 10 °C.

Özet

Zeytinin anavatanı olan Türkiye, dünyanın önde gelen zeytin üreticilerinden biridir. Türkiye’de en fazla zeytin üretimi yapan iller arasında İzmir, Aydın, Çanakkale, Balıkesir, Muğla ve Bursa yer almaktadır. Zeytinin ana zararlısı olan Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae), ülkemiz zeytin yetiştiriciliğinde önemli bir sorundur. Daha önceki çalışmalarla ülkemizde tespit edilmiş 4 yerel entomopatojen nematod türünün (Steinernema feltiae/12, Steinernema carpocapsae/1133, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora/70, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora/91), tek doz ve 5 farklı sıcaklıkta (10, 15, 20, 25 ve 30 oC) laboratuvar koşullarında B. oleae pupaları üzerinde meydana getirdikleri infeksiyon oranları belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre en yüksek infeksiyon oranı 25 °C’de Heterorhabditis bacteriophora/91 izolatında, en düşük infeksiyon oranı 10 °C’de Steinernema feltiae/12 izolatında gözlemlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yılmaz, A., Çakmak, T., Gözel, U. (2024). Effectiveness of four Turkish entomopathogenic nematode isolates against Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) pupae at different temperatures. Türkiye Biyolojik Mücadele Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.31019/tbmd.1410289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Akhurst R. J. & N. E. Boemare, 2018. Biology and taxonomy of Xenorhabdus. In Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control (pp. 75-90). CRC press.
  2. Ataş H., Ç. Gözel, & U. Gözel, 2020. Bazı entomopatojen nematod türlerinin zeytin fidantırtılı Palpita unionalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)’e karşı virülensliğinin araştırılması. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 35 (3): 309-315.
  3. Bedding R. A. & R. J. Akhurst, 1975. A simple technique for the detection of insect parasitic Rhabditid nematodes in soil. Nematologica, 21 (1): 109-110.
  4. Bedding R. A. & A. S. Molyneux, 1982. Penetration of insect cuticle by infective juveniles of Heterorhabditis spp. (Heterorhabditidae: Nematoda). Nematologica, 28 (3): 354-359.
  5. Erdoğuş F. D., T. A. Fırat, M. Yağcı & İ. Kepenekçi, 2023. Entomopatojen nematod, Steinernema carpocapsae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae)’nın incir kurdu Ephestia cautella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae) üzerindeki etkinliğinin belirlenmesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 26 (1): 70-75.
  6. Godjo A., L. Zadji, W. Decraemer, A., Willems & L. Afouda, 2018. Pathogenicity of indigenous entomopathogenic nematodes from Benin against mango fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis) under laboratory conditions. Biological Control, 117, 68-77.
  7. Gözel Ç., A. Yılmaz, H. Ataş & U. Gözel, 2020. Yerel entomopatojen nematodların süne Eurygaster integriceps Puton, 1881 (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) erginleri üzerindeki etkinliği. Türkiye Biyolojik Mücadele Dergisi, 11 (1): 139-148.
  8. Grewal P. S., R. U. Ehlers & D. I. Shapıro-Ilan, 2005. Nematodes as biocontrol agents. CABI Publishing, USA, p., 506.
  9. Grewal P. S. & R. Georgis, 1998. Entomopathogenic nematodes. In “Methods in Biotechnology, Vol 5: Biopesticides: Use and Delivery”. F.R. Hall & J. Menn, eds. Humana Press: 271-299, Totowa, N.J.
  10. Heve W. K., F. E. El‐Borai, D. Carrillo & L. W. Duncan, 2017. Biological control potential of entomopathogenic nematodes for management of Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa Loew (Tephritidae). Pest Management Science, 73 (6): 1220-1228.
  11. Kaya H. K. & S. P. Stock, 1997. Techniques in insect nematology. In: Lacey, L.A. Ed. manual of techniques in insect pathology. Biological Techniques Series. San Diego, London: Academic Press, 281-324.
  12. Kepenekci I., S. Hazir & A. Özdem, 2015. Evaluation of native entomopathogenic nematodes for the control of the European cherry fruit fly Rhagoletis cerasi L. (Diptera: Tephritidae) larvae in soil. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 39 (1): 74-79.
  13. Klein M. G., 1990 Efficacy against soil-inhabiting insect pests. In “Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control.” Gaugler R. & H. K. Kaya, eds, CRC Press, 195– 214, Boca Raton.
  14. Koppenhöfer A. M., 2007. Nematodes. In “Field Manual of Techniques in Invertebrate Pathology: Application and Evaluation of Pathogens for Control of Insects and Other Invertebrate Pests” Lawrence A.L. & H.K. Kaya, eds., Springer, 249, P.O. Box 17, 3300 AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  15. Lacey L. A., 2001. Control of codling moth, Cydia pomonella, with Steinernema carpocapsae: Effects of supplemental wetting and pupation site on infection rate. Biological Control, 20 (1): 48-56.
  16. Minas R. D. S., R. M. Souza, C. Dolinski, R. D. S. Carvalho & R. D. S. Burla, 2016. Potential of entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) to control Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) soil stages. Nematoda, 3.
  17. Özdemir E. & E. Evlice, 2020. Assessment of the susceptibility of the Turkestan cockroach, Blatta lateralis to Turkish isolates of entomopathogenic nematodes. Türkiye Biyolojik Mücadele Dergisi, 11 (1): 129-137.
  18. Poinar G. O. Jr., 1979. Nematodes for biological control of insects, C.R.C. Press, Boca Raton, FL., 249-277.
  19. Poinar G. O. & P. S. Grewal, 2012. History of entomopathogenic nematology. Journal of Nematology, 44 (2): 153.
  20. Rohde C., A. M. Junior, F. D. Carvalho & M. A. da Silva, 2012. Selection of entomopathogenic nematodes for the control of the fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, 7, 797-802.
  21. Sirjani F. O., E. E. Lewis & H. K. Kaya, 2009. Evaluation of entomopathogenic nematodes against the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Biological Control, 48 (3): 274-280.
  22. Smart Jr. G. C., 1995. Entomopathogenic nematodes for the biological control of insects. Journal of Nematology, 27 (4S): 529.
  23. Şahin Ç., & U. Gözel, 2021. Efficacy and persistence of native entomopathogenic nematodes against Capnodis tenebrionis in peach (Prunus persica) orchard in Turkey. Phytoparasitica, 49 (4): 613-621.
  24. Torrini G., G. Mazza, C. Benvenuti & P. F. Roversi, 2017. Susceptibility of olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) pupae to entomopathogenic nematodes. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 57(3).
  25. Torrini G., G. Mazza, C. Benvenuti, S. Simoncini, S. Landi, R. Frosinini & P. F. Roversi, 2020. Entomopathogenic nematodes as potential biocontrol agents against Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Biocontrol Science and Technology, 30 (9): 909-919.
  26. Ünlü İ. O. & N. Özer, 2003. Evaluation of the reproductive potential and competition between two entomopathogenic nematodes, Steinernema feltiae Filipjev, 1934 (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar, 1976 (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae). Turkish Journal of Biology, 27 (3): 149-155.
  27. Wang Y. & R. Gaugler, 1998. Host and penetration site location by entomopathogenic nematodes against Japanese beetle larvae. The Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 72 (3): 313-318.