Journals / Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Properties of reactive powder concrete incorporating silica fume and rice husk ash

Pages
114–127
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Test results have indicated that RHA exhibits lower pozzolanic activity than SF.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Reactive Powder Concrete (RPC) is composed of very fine powders (cement, sand, and pozzolanic materials), and superplasticizers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Recently, using supplementary cementing materials associates greatly with ultra-high strength and the mix design of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Test results have indicated that RHA exhibits lower pozzolanic activity than SF.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Reactive Powder Concrete (RPC) is composed of very fine powders (cement, sand, and pozzolanic materials), and superplasticizers. A very dense matrix is found, and this tightness provides RPC with ultra-high strength and durability. Recently, using supplementary cementing materials associates greatly with ultra-high strength and the mix design of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC). These materials could be natural, by-products or industrial wastes. They could be also less energy consuming and little time produced materials. Silica fume (SF), rice husk ash (RHA) and granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) etc. are among the major supplementary cementing materials utilized. The detailed experimental investigation done to study the impact of partial alteration of cement with SF, RHA, and GBFS on concrete properties. This study aims to a minor replacement of Portland cement by SF, RHA and GBFS to reach UHPC. Twenty-five different concrete mixes (fc =150.1 to 188.2 MPa) with and without SF, RHA and GBFS were prepared with local materials in Egypt. Concrete mixes were cast with 0, 10, 15, 20, and 25% cement replaced by either SF or RHA, and another proportions taken combination between SF and RHA or SF and GBFS or RHA and GBFS about percentages from 10 to 15%. The mixes were tested for slump flow, air content, mechanical properties and water permeability. The findings of hardened properties indicate that optimum level for partial changing of cement by SF and RHA was 20% and it is observed that though the strengths of SF or RHA concrete goes on decreasing after the 20% addition of SF or RHA. Test results have indicated that RHA exhibits lower pozzolanic activity than SF.

🔖

Cite This Article

AMİN, M. (2018). Properties of reactive powder concrete incorporating silica fume and rice husk ash. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 114–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/143285

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. ASTM C78/C78M - 16 (2016). Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. ASTM C143/C143M - 15a (2015). Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. ASTM C231/C231M - 17a (2017). Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method". ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. ASTM C469/C469M - 14 (2014). Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. ASTM C496/C496M - 11 (2011). Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. B.S.1881, Part 116, (1989). Method for Determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes. British Standards Institution (BSI), UK. B.S.1881, Part 207 (1992). Method for Determination of Bond Strength of Concrete Cylinders. British Standards Institution (BSI), UK. BS EN 197-1 (2011).
  2. Cement. Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements. British Standards Institution (BSI), UK. Chan YW, Chu SH (2004). Effect of silica fume on steel fiber bond characteristics in reactive powder concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(7), 1167-1172.
  3. Chung DDL (2002). Review: Improving cement-based materials by using silica fume. Journal of Materials Science, 37(4), 673–682.
  4. Dugat J, Roux N, Bernier G (1996). Mechanical properties of reactive powder concretes. Materials and structures, 29(4), 233-240. Egyptian Code of Practice: ECP 203-2017 (2017). Design and Construction for Reinforced Concrete Structures. Ministry of Building Construction, Research Center for Housing, Building and Physical Planning, Cairo, Egypt. ES 4756-1 (2013). Cement Part: (1) Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements. Egyptian organization for Standardization and Quality (EOS), Egypt. Gerlicher T, Heinz D, Urbonas L (2008). Effect of finely ground blast furnace slag on the properties of fresh and hardened UHPC. In: Second International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete, 367-374.
  5. Hirschi T, Wombacher F (2008). Influence of different superplasticizers on UHPC. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete, Kassel University Press, Kassel, 77-84.
  6. Hommer H (2009). Interaction of polycarboxylate ether with silica fume. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 29(