Journals / Bankacılar / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 110

The Relationship of Corporate Governance Practices and Financial Performance of Banks: A Panel Data Analysis

Bankaların Kurumsal Yönetim Uygulamaları İle Finansal Performansları Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Panel Veri Analizi

Pages
114–128
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As the corporate governance indicators, independent variables are the ratio of share that go public, qualified shareholding ratio, the number of independent board members and rating of compliance with corporate governance principles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of corporate governance practices on the financial performance of banks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purposes, the relationship between the financial performance and corporate governance of 9 publicly listed banks in Turkey in the period of 2004-2017 have been examined by employing panel data analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As the corporate governance indicators, independent variables are the ratio of share that go public, qualified shareholding ratio, the number of independent board members and rating of compliance with corporate governance principles.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of corporate governance practices on the financial performance of banks. For this purposes, the relationship between the financial performance and corporate governance of 9 publicly listed banks in Turkey in the period of 2004-2017 have been examined by employing panel data analysis. As the financial performance indicators, dependent variables are return on assets ratio, return on equity ratio, net interest margin, Tobin’s Q ratio and dividend yield. As the corporate governance indicators, independent variables are the ratio of share that go public, qualified shareholding ratio, the number of independent board members and rating of compliance with corporate governance principles.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, bankaların kurumsal yönetim uygulamalarının finansal performanslarını istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde etkileyip etkilemediğini analiz etmektir. Bu amaçla Türkiye’de faaliyette bulunan ve hisseleri borsada işlem gören 9 bankanın 2004-2017 dönemini kapsayan yıllık verileri kullanılarak bir panel veri analizi yapılmıştır. Finansal performans göstergesi olarak alınan bağımlı değişkenler aktif karlılığı, özkaynak karlılığı, net faiz marjı, Tobin’s Q oranı ve temettü verimliliğidir. Kurumsal yönetim uygulamalarının göstergesi olarak alınan bağımsız değişkenler ise bankaların halka açıklık oranı, nitelikli pay sahipliği oranı, bağımsız üye sayısı ve kurumsal yönetim derecelendirme notu olarak belirlenmiştir. Analiz sonucuna göre, çalışma kapsamında ele alınan tüm kurumsal yönetim uygulamalarının, finansal performans göstergelerinin tamamını doğrudan etkilemediği görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

FİGANKAPLAN, T. (2019). The Relationship of Corporate Governance Practices and Financial Performance of Banks: A Panel Data Analysis. Bankacılar, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 110, 114–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/141828

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Andersson, J., Nordwall, J. ve Salomonsson, D. (2004). The Link Between Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence From Sweden’s Listed Companies. Industrial and Financial Economic Review, (37)1. Arora, A. ve Sharma, C. (2015). Impact of Firm Performance on Board Characteristics: Empiricial Evidence From India. Society and Management Review, 4(1), 53-70.
  2. Aytekin, M. ve Sönmez, A. R., (2016). Kurumsal Yönetim Uygulamalarının İşletme Performansına Etkisi. Türk Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 30-39.
  3. Bebczuk, R. N. (2005). Corporate Governance and Ownership: Measurement and Impact on Corporate Performance and Dividend Policies in Argentina, Latin American Research Network Working Paper, R-5/16. Beiner, S., Drobetz, M. ve Zimmerman, H. (2004). An Integrated Framework of Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation Evidence From Switzerland, European Corporate Governance Instıtute Finance Working Paper, 2(3). Black, B. (2001). The Corporate Governance Behavior and Market Value of Russian Firms, Emerging Markets Review, 2, 2, 89-108.
  4. Chiang, H. (2005). An Empirical Study of Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance", The Journal of American Academy of Business, 6(1), Cambridge, March. Coşkun. M., Sayılır, Ö. (2012). Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of Turkish Companies, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3( 14), 59-64.
  5. Ege, İ., Topaloğlu, E. ve Özyamanoğlu, M. (2013). Finansal Performans ile Kurumsal Yönetim Notları Arasındaki İlişki: BIST Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 5(9), 100-117.
  6. Ferrer, R. C., ve Banderlipe, R. S. (2012). The Influence of Corporate Board Characteristics on Firm Performance of Publicly Listed Property Companies in the Philippines. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 16( 4), 123-142.
  7. Gompers, P., J. Ishii L. ve Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate Governance and Equity Prices, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118/1, p.107-155.
  8. Greene, W.H. (2003),
  9. Econometric Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Press.
  10. Gümüş, G. K., Gümüş, Y. ve Altunal, I. (2017). Bankacılık Sektöründe Kurumsal Yönetim ve Finansal Performans İlişkisi: Türkiye ve Kazakistan Örneği. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 104-121.
  11. Javid, A. Y. ve Robina, I. (2007). Relationship Between Corporate Governance Indicators and Firm Value: A Case Study of Karachi Stock Exchange, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PID