Journals / Acta Medica / 2020 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

A Study on the Intraocular Pressure of the Affected and Unaffected Eyes in Patients with Isolated Cranial Nerve Palsies

Pages
15–20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings are the first and important for ophthalmology practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The role of elevated intraocular pressure in the progression of glaucoma is well known.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The charts of 1712 patients were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings are the first and important for ophthalmology practice.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The role of elevated intraocular pressure in the progression of glaucoma is well known. The exact mechanisms of intraocular pressure regulation are still unclear. Central control has been suggested, but the autonomic pathway through which it acts is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate if isolated cranial nerve palsies of the third, fourth and sixth nerves are associated with an intraocular pressure difference between the affected and the unaffected eyes. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study including patients diagnosed with a third, fourth and sixth nerve palsy at a single tertiary centre. We included only patients with an isolated unilateral palsy. Patients with a history of strabismus, orbital disease or neurosurgical cases were excluded. Results: The charts of 1712 patients were reviewed. Third, fourth and sixth nerve palsies were found in 469 patients, 314 patients and 929 patients, respectively. Of all patients, 190 (10.6%) were eligible for inclusion in the study. A third nerve, fourth nerve or sixth nerve palsy was present in 85 (44.7%), 65 (34.2%) and 40 (21.1%) patients, respectively. The mean intraocular pressure of the affected eyes and the unaffected eyes was not statistically significant different: 14.1 ± 3.1 mmHg vs. 14.6 ± 2.7 mmHg in the cranial nerve 3 group (p=0.087); 13.6 ± 2.6 mmHg vs. 13.7 ± 2.3 mmHg in the cranial nerve 4 group (p=0.69); and 14.3 ± 2.7 mmHg vs. 14.9 ± 3.3 mmHg in the cranial nerve 6 group (p=0.089). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean intraocular pressure differences of the affected and unaffected eyes among the three groups (p=0.47). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated no difference in intraocular pressure between affected and unaffected eyes in patients with an isolated cranial nerve palsy. These findings are the first and important for ophthalmology practice.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİKMETAŞ, Ö., VOYKOV, B. (2020). A Study on the Intraocular Pressure of the Affected and Unaffected Eyes in Patients with Isolated Cranial Nerve Palsies. Acta Medica, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 15–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/141613

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Quigley HA. Glaucoma. Lancet 2011;377:1367-77
  2. Anderson DR. Glaucoma: the damage caused by pressure. XLVI Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:485-95
  3. Davis BM, Crawley L, Pahlitzsch M, et al. Glaucoma: the retina and beyond. Acta Neuropathol 2016;132:807-826
  4. Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Lichter PR, et al. Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors. Ophthalmology 2009;116:200-7
  5. McDougal DH, Gamlin PD. Autonomic control of the eye. Compr Physiol 2015;5:439-73
  6. Bremner F. Pupil evaluation as a test for autonomic disorders. Clin Auton Res 2009;19:88-101
  7. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1268-79
  8. Guo ZZ, Chang K, Wei X. Intraocular pressure fluctuation and the risk of glaucomatous damage deterioration: a Meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol 2019;12:123-128
  9. Matlach J, Bender S, Konig J, et al. Investigation of intraocular pressure fluctuation as a risk factor of glaucoma progression. Clin Ophthalmol 2019;13:9-16
  10. O’Callaghan J, Cassidy PS, Humphries P. Open-angle glaucoma: therapeutically targeting the extracellular matrix of the conventional outflow pathway. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2017;21:1037-1050
  11. Stamer WD, Braakman ST, Zhou EH, et al. Biomechanics of Schlemm’s canal endothelium and intraocular pressure reduction. Prog Retin Eye Res 2015;44:86-98
  12. Ruskell GL. An ocular parasympathetic nerve pathway of facial nerve origin and its influence on intraocular pressure. Exp Eye Res 1970;10:319-30
  13. Stone RA, Tervo T, Tervo K, et al. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-like immunoreactive nerves to the human eye. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1986;64:12-8
  14. Belmonte C, Bartels SP, Liu JH, et al. Effects of stimulation of the ocular sympathetic nerves on IOP and aqueous humor flow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:1649-54
  15. Greaves DP, Perkins ES. Influence of the sympathetic nervous system on the intra-ocular pressure and vascular circulation of the eye. Br J Ophthalmol 1952;36:258-64
  16. Uusitalo R. Effect of sympathetic and parasympathetic stimulation on the secretion and outflow of aqueous humour in the rabbit eye. Acta Physiol Scand 1972;86:315-26
  17. Stjernschantz J, Geijer C, Bill A. Electrical stimulation of the fifth cranial nerve in rabbits: effects on ocul