SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 20

A Study on the Effect of Workplace Incivility on Psychological Capital

İşyeri Nezaketsizliğinin Psikolojik Sermaye Üzerine Etkisine İlişkin Bir Araştırma

Mustafa Taşlıyan(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1141-9846
Bilge Güler(NİĞDE ÖMER HALİSDEMİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5361-8304
Serpil İmer(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3723-7955
Pages
198–216
Publication Date
2023-02-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Research findings revealed that workplace incivility negatively affects the self-efficacy, resilience, and optimism dimensions of psychological capital.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is aimed at investigating the effect of workplace incivility on psychological capital and its dimensions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, a questionnaire was applied to the employees of two shopping malls in Mersin province and Erdemli district, and 377 observations were made.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Research findings revealed that workplace incivility negatively affects the self-efficacy, resilience, and optimism dimensions of psychological capital.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yönetici Nezaketsizliği · İş Arkadaşı Nezaketsizliği · Psikolojik Sermaye

Abstract

This study is aimed at investigating the effect of workplace incivility on psychological capital and its dimensions. Workplace incivility is handled as incivility practiced by the supervisor and co-workers. For this purpose, a questionnaire was applied to the employees of two shopping malls in Mersin province and Erdemli district, and 377 observations were made. The obtained data were tested with frequency, reliability, validity, correlation, and regression analyses using SPSS. Research findings revealed that workplace incivility negatively affects the self-efficacy, resilience, and optimism dimensions of psychological capital. The strongest effect was found between the supervisor's incivility and resilience dimensions. According to this, it was seen that the incivility applied by the supervisors decreased the psychological resilience level of the employees. In this study, this effect was examined on the basis of dimensions, and suggestions were made to reduce workplace incivility and increase psychological capital.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, işyeri nezaketsizliğinin psikolojik sermaye ve boyutları üzerine etkisini araştırmak amaçlanmıştır. İşyeri nezaketsizliği, yönetici ve iş arkadaşı tarafından uygulanan nezaketsizlik olarak ele alınmıştır. Bu amaçla Mersin ili ve Erdemli ilçesinde bulunan iki alışveriş merkezinin çalışanları üzerine anket uygulanmış ve 377 gözleme ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS kullanılarak frekans, güvenilirlik, geçerlilik, korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri ile test edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, işyeri nezaketsizliğinin psikolojik sermaye boyutlarından öz-yeterlilik, dayanıklılık ve iyimserlik boyutlarını negatif yönde etkilediğini ortaya koymuştur. En güçlü etki ise yönetici nezaketsizliği ile dayanıklılık boyutu arasında çıkmıştır. Buna göre özellikle yöneticiler tarafından uygulanan nezaketsizliğin çalışanların psikolojik dayanıklılık düzeyini azalttığı görülmüştür. Bu araştırmada, boyutlar bazında etki incelenerek işyeri nezaketsizliğinin azaltılması ve psikolojik sermayenin arttırılması ile ilgili öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Taşlıyan, M., Güler, B., İmer, S. (2023). A Study on the Effect of Workplace Incivility on Psychological Capital. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 20, 198–216. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1205145

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Akcakavaklı, H. (2019). İşyeri nezaketsizliği ile stres arasındaki ilişkide psikolojik sermayenin rolü (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. İstanbul.
  2. Alias, M., Ojo, A.O. ve Ameruddin, N.F L. (2020). Workplace incivility: The impact on the Malaysian public service department. European Journal of Training and Development. 46(3/4), 356-372, https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-02-2020-0031
  3. Al-Zyoud, M.F. ve Mert, İ.S. (2019). Does employees’ psychological capital buffer the negative effects of incivility?. EuroMed Journal of Business, 14(3), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-03-2018-0021
  4. Baran, H. ve Giderler Karavelioğlu, C. (2022). İşyeri nezaketsizliğinin işe adanmaya etkisinde psikolojik sermaye bileşenlerinin rolü. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 6(2), 2235-2259. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/alanyaakademik/issue/70088/1030523
  5. Butt, S. ve Yazdani, N. (2021). Influence of workplace incivility on counterproductive work behavior: Mediating role of emotional exhaustion, organizational cynicism and the moderating role of psychological capital. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 15(2), 378-404. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/237082/1/1766511570.pdf
  6. Chang, C.M., Liu, L.W., Huang, H.C. ve Hsieh, H.H. (2019). The influence of workplace incivility on employees’ emotional exhaustion in recreational sport/fitness clubs: A cross-level analysis of the links between psychological capital and perceived service climate. Healthcare, 7(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7040159
  7. Cortina, L.M., Magley, V.J., Williams, J.H. ve Langhout, R.D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64
  8. Çetin, F. ve Basım, H.J. (2012). Örgütsel psikolojik sermaye: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 45(1), 121-137. https://www.academia.edu/1757439/%C3%96rg%C3%BCtsel_Psikolojik_Sermaye_Bir_%C3%96l%C3%A7ek_Uyarlama_%C3%87al%C4%B1%C5%9Fmas%C4%B1?bulkDownload=thisPaper-topRelated-sameAuthor-citingThis-citedByThis-secondOrderCitations&from=cover_page?
  9. Çetin, Y. (2021). İşyeri nezaketsizliğinin psikolojik sermaye düzeyine etkisi: Hemşireler üzerine bir araştırma. Karya Journal of Health Science, 2(3), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.956121
  10. De Clercq, D., Haq, I.U., Azeem, M.U. ve Ahmad, H.N. (2019). The relationship between workplace incivility and helping behavior: Roles of job dissatisfaction and political skill. The Journal of psychology, 153(5), 507-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2019.1567453
  11. Ellahi, A., Ishfaq, U., Imran, A., Iqbal, M.A.B., Hayat, M.T. ve Abid, M. (2021). Effect of workaholism, job demands and social support on workplace incivility. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 20(4), 1331-1349. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359471739
  12. Erkmen, T. ve Esen, E. (2012). Bilişim sektöründe çalışanların psikolojik sermaye düzeylerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 55-72. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/akuiibfd/issue/1620/20297
  13. Estes, B. ve Wang, J. (2008). Workplace incivility: Impacts on individual and organizational performance, Human Resource Development Review, 7(2), 218-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484308315565
  14. Firoz, M. ve Chaudhary, R. (2022). The impact of workplace loneliness on employee outcomes: What role does psychological capital play?. Personnel Review, 51(4), 1221-1247. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2020-0200
  15. Gök, S., Karatuna, I. ve Başol, O. (2019). İşyeri nezaketsizliği ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 22(44), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpy1301996120181128m000009
  16. Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  17. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. ve Anderson, R.E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
  18. Hashemi, S.E, Savadkouhi S, Naami A, Beshlideh K. (2018). Relationship between job stress and workplace incivility regarding to the moderating role of psychological capital. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 20(2), 103-12. http://eprints.mums.ac.ir/9777/1/JFMH_Volume%2020_Issue%202_Pages%20103-112-2.pdf
  19. Işıkay, Ç. ve Taslak, S. (2021). İşyeri nezaketsizliği: Ulusal literatür üzerine bir içerik analizi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(39), 521-552. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.839745
  20. Kanten, P. (2014). İşyeri nezaketsizliğinin sosyal kaytarma davranışı ve işten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkisinde duygusal tükenmenin aracılık rolü. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 11-26. http://aksarayiibd.aksaray.edu.tr/tr/pub/issue/22548/240977
  21. Kayış, A. (2018). Güvenilirlik analizi. Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri içinde (s. 404-421). Dinamik Akademi.
  22. Khan, M.S., Elahi, N.S. ve Abid, G. (2021). Workplace incivility and job satisfaction: Mediation of subjective well-being and moderation of forgiveness climate in health care sector. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(4), 1107-1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11040082
  23. Ko, S.H., Kim, J. ve Choi, Y. (2021). Compassion and workplace incivility: Implications for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010095
  24. Küçük, Ö. ve Çakıcı, A. (2018a). İşyeri kabalığının çalışan performansına etkisi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(39), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.443818
  25. Küçük, Ö. ve Çakıcı, A. (2018b). İşyeri kabalığının öznel iyi oluş haline etkisi. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 5(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/ 10.18394/iid.368835
  26. Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 695-706. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.165
  27. Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J., Avey, J. B. ve Norman, S.M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel psychology, 60(3), 541-572. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x?casa_token
  28. Luthans, F., Youssef, C.M., ve Avolio, B.J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.
  29. Mahfooz, Z., Arshad, A., Nisar, Q.A., Ikram, M. ve Azeem, M. (2017). Does workplace incivility & workplace ostracism influence the employees’ turnover intentions? Mediating role of burnout and job stress & moderating role of psychological capital. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(8), 398-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i8/3244
  30. Masten, A.S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience process in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.3.227
  31. Megeirhi, H.A.A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between authentic leadership and employee cynicism, tolerance to workplace incivility and job search behavior via the moderating role of team psychological capital (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi. Kıbrıs.
  32. Preena, G.R. ve Janadari N. (2021). Perceived workplace ostracism and deviant workplace behavior: The moderating effect of psychological capital. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences. 15(3), 476-496. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3956113
  33. Pryce Jones, J. (2010). Happiness at work maximizing your psychological capital for success. Wiley-Blackwell.
  34. Qiu, S. ve Zhang, R. (2022). The relationship between workplace incivility and psychological distress: The moderating role of servant leadership. Workplace Health & Safety, 20(10), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799221084067
  35. Roter, A.B. (2019). The dark side of the workplace: Managing incivility. Routledge.
  36. Sameer, Y.M. (2018). Innovative behavior and psychological capital: Does positivity make any difference?.Journal of Economics & Management, 32(2), 75-101. https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2018.32.06
  37. Samma, M., Zhao, Y., Rasool, S.F., Han, X. ve Ali, S. (2020). Exploring the relationship between innovative work behavior, job anxiety, workplace ostracism, and workplace incivility: Empirical evidence from small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Healthcare, 8(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040508
  38. Semu, B.N. ve Goyal, S. (2019). Curtailing the reciprocal effect of coworkers’ incivility: Does psychological capital buffer the relationship?. International Journal of Management Studies, 1(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.18843/ijms/v6i1(4)/01
  39. Setar, S.B., Buitendach, J.H. ve Kanengoni, H. (2015). The moderating role of psychological capital in the relationship between job stress and the outcomes of incivility and job involvement amongst call centre employees. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 41(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ sajip.v41i1.1183
  40. Shabir, M., Abrar, M., Baig, S.A. ve Javed, M. (2014). The contribution of workplace incivility and psychological capital toward job stress. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 4(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v4i2.5786
  41. Sharma, S. K., ve Sharma, S. (2015). Psychological capital as a predictor of workplace behavior. Journal of Management Research, 15(1), 60-70. https://web.s.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=1516ba45-464a-4abe-8e69-3e8e7765b136%40redis
  42. Sungur, O. (2018). Korelasyon analizi. Ş. Kalaycı, (Ed.), SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri içinde (s. 115-130). Dinamik Akademi.
  43. Tamunomiebi, M.D. ve Akubueze U.O. (2021). Workplace incivility and counterproductive work behaviour: A review of literature. European Journal of Human Resource, 5(1), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.47672/ejh.686
  44. Tortumlu, M. ve Taş, M.A. (2020). İşyeri kabalığı ve mutluluk ilişkisinde iş yaşamında yalnızlığın düzenleyici etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 23(2), 706-719. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/selcuksbmyd/issue/57972/610444
  45. Uras, M. (2000). Lise öğretmenlerinin örgüt sağlığının moral, yenilikçilik, özerklik, uyum ve problem çözme yeterliği boyutlarına ilişkin algıları. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(7), 1-8. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/pauefd/issue/11136/133212
  46. Vilariño del Castillo, D. ve Lopez‐Zafra, E. (2022). Antecedents of psychological capital at work: A systematic review of moderator-mediator effects and a new integrative proposal. European Management Review, 19(1), 154-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12460
  47. Woo, C.H. ve Kim, C. (2020). Impact of workplace incivility on compassion competence of Korean nurses: Moderating effect of psychological capital. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(3), 682-689. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12982
  48. Yeni, H. ve Sezici, E. (2022). Pozitif psikolojik sermayenin iş stresi üzerindeki etkisinin belirlenmesi. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 6(2), 2379-2397. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1059474
  49. Yıldız. S. ve Bayrakçı, C. (2020). İşyeri nezaketsizliği ile iş stresi arasındaki ilişki: Akademisyenler üzerine bir araştırma. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (40), 515-529. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.646525
  50. Roter, A.B. (2019). The dark side of the workplace: Managing incivility. Routledge.