SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 21

From Extraordinary Event to Extraordinary Leadership: An Evaluation on The Behaviors of President During the Pandemic Process

Sıra Dışı Olaydan Sıra Dışı Liderliğe: Ülke Liderlerinin Pandemi Sürecindeki Davranışları Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

Arzu Özkanan(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2166-7827
Yunus Yılan(AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SANDIKLI MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0001-5467-8675
Pages
532–552
Publication Date
2023-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, extraordinary leaders exhibit charismatic, ideological and pragmatic leadership behaviors, as well as a successful extraordinary leader; proactive, democratic, collaborative, foresight and precautionary, compassionate, empathetic; the unsuccessful extraordinary leader, on the other hand, has been found to have characteristics that are far from science, arrogant, prejudiced, do not care about expert opinions, dreamer, do not take responsibility, and mislead followers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Extraordinary leaders are faced with risky and difficult situations in their decisions to manage extraordinary conditions due to their position.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fact that processes such as the conditions related to the COVID-19 epidemic, school services, and behaviors require a detailed questioning of extraordinary leadership uses constitute the purpose of use.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, extraordinary leaders exhibit charismatic, ideological and pragmatic leadership behaviors, as well as a successful extraordinary leader; proactive, democratic, collaborative, foresight and precautionary, compassionate, empathetic; the unsuccessful extraordinary leader, on the other hand, has been found to have characteristics that are far from science, arrogant, prejudiced, do not care about expert opinions, dreamer, do not take responsibility, and mislead followers.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sıradışı liderlik · siyasi lider · pandemi

Abstract

Extraordinary leaders are faced with risky and difficult situations in their decisions to manage extraordinary conditions due to their position. The fact that processes such as the conditions related to the COVID-19 epidemic, school services, and behaviors require a detailed questioning of extraordinary leadership uses constitute the purpose of use. The study, which aims to determine the leadership characteristics according to the behaviors they exhibit by examining the pandemic practices and decisions of the country leaders within the framework of goal-oriented leadership approaches, was designed with a qualitative method. In the paper, the statements of the country leaders in the press and in their official accounts were examined by transferring them to the Nvivo 10 program, taking into account the official first appearance of the coronavirus in Germany, America, China, England and Russia. As a result, extraordinary leaders exhibit charismatic, ideological and pragmatic leadership behaviors, as well as a successful extraordinary leader; proactive, democratic, collaborative, foresight and precautionary, compassionate, empathetic; the unsuccessful extraordinary leader, on the other hand, has been found to have characteristics that are far from science, arrogant, prejudiced, do not care about expert opinions, dreamer, do not take responsibility, and mislead followers.

Özet

Sıra dışı liderler konumları gereği sıra dışı koşulları yönetebilmek için verecekleri kararlarda riskli ve zor durumlarla karşı karşıya kalmaktadırlar. COVID-19 salgını ile değişen koşullar, ülkelerin imkanları, teknolojinin gelişimi gibi olayların sıra dışı liderliği yeniden ayrıntılı bir biçimde sorgulanmayı gerektirmesi çalışmanın amacını oluşturmaktadır. Ülke liderlerinin pandemi uygulamaları ve kararlarının sıra dışı liderlik yaklaşımları çerçevesinde incelenerek sergiledikleri davranışlara göre liderlik özelliklerini belirlemek amacı güden çalışma nitel metot ile dizayn edilmiştir. Çalışmada koronavirüsün Almanya Federal Cumhuriyeti, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti, Birleşik Krallık ve Rusya Federasyonu ülkelerinde resmi olarak ilk görülme tarihleri dikkate alınarak ülke liderlerinin basında ve resmi hesaplarında yer alan açıklamaları Nvivo 10 programına aktarılarak incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular sonucunda sıra dışı liderlerin karizmatik, ideolojik ve pragmatik liderlik davranışlarını sergilemelerinin yanı sıra başarılı bir sıra dışı liderin; proaktif, demokratik, işbirliğine yatkın ve önlem alabilen, şefkatli, empatik; başarısız sıra dışı liderin ise bilimden uzak, kibirli, önyargılı, uzman görüşlerini önemsemeyen, hayalperest, sorumluluk almayan, takipçileri yanlış yönlendiren özellikleri olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkanan, A., Yılan, Y. (2023). From Extraordinary Event to Extraordinary Leadership: An Evaluation on The Behaviors of President During the Pandemic Process. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 21, 532–552. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1144244

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (77)

  1. Ashforth, B.E. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47(7), 755-778.
  2. Avrupa Birliği, (2022, 12 Şubat). Germany country profiles. https://european-un-ion.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/country-profiles/germany_en
  3. Bakan,İ. ve Büyükbeşe, T. (2010). Liderlik “türleri” ve “güç kaynakları”na ilişkin mevcut-gelecek durum karşılaştırması: Eğitim kurumu yöneticilerinin algılarına dayalı bir alan araştırması. Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey Üniversitesi, Sosyal ve Ekonomi̇k Araştırmalar Dergi̇si, 12(19), 73-84.
  4. Barnard, C.I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
  5. Bass, B.M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
  6. Bass, B.M. (1997). Personal selling and transactional/transformational leadership. Journal Of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 17(3), 19-28.
  7. Bass, B.M. (1998). Transformational leadership: industry, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, Nj: Erlbaum Associates.
  8. Bass, B.M. ve Avolio, B.J. (2004). Manual for multifactor leadership questionnaire: Sampler Set, 3rd edn. Mind Garden Inc., Redwood City, CA.
  9. Baytok, A. (2006). Hizmet işletmelerinde örgüt kültürünün oluşturulmasında liderin rolü. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Afyonkarahisar.
  10. Bennhold, K. (2022, 12 Şubat). A German exception? Why the country’s coronavirus death rate is low. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/04/world/europe/germany-coronavirus-death-rate.html
  11. Beyer, J. M. (1999). Taming and promoting charisma to change organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 307−330.
  12. Blau, A. ve Schwartz, P. (2020). COVID-19 ile Yeniden Şekillenen Dünya Dirençli Liderler İçin Senaryolar, 3-5 Yıl, https://www2.deloit¬te.com/content/dam/Deloitte/tr/Documents/ consulting/COVID-19-ile-yeniden-sekillenen-dunya.pdf
  13. Chandra. F, T. ve Priyono. (2016). The influence of leadership styles, work environment and job satisfaction of employee performance. International Education Studies, 9(1), 131-140.
  14. Dvir, T. ve Shamir, B. (2003). Follower developmental characteristics as predicting transformational leadership: A longitudinal field study. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 327−344.
  15. Congar, K. (2020). Kadın liderler Covid-19’a ‘aman vermedi’, erkek meslektaşlarına fark attı. Şubat 2022, https://tr.euronews.com/2020/04/15/kad-n-liderler-covid-19-a-aman-vermedi-erkek-meslektaslar-na-fark-att
  16. Çağlar, İ. (2004). İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi öğrencileri ile Mühendislik Fakültesi öğrencilerinin liderlik tarzına ilişkin eğilimlerinin karşılaştırılmalı analizi ve Çorum örneği. Gazi Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, Ankara
  17. Deep Knowledge Group. (2022, 12 Şubat). COVID-19 Regional safety assessment navigation, https://www.dkv.global/covid
  18. DEİK, (2023, 13 Mart). Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Ülke Bülteni, Dış Ekonomik İlişkiler Kurulu, https://www.deik.org.tr/uploads/deik-amerika-birlesik-devletleri-ulke-bulteni-mart-2012.pdf
  19. Den Hartog, D.N., House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Ruiz-Quintazilla, S.A. ve Dorfman, P.W. (1999). Culture spesific and cross-culturally generalizable ımplicit leadership theories: are attiributes of carizmatic, transformational leadership universally endersed?. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 219-256.
  20. D’Souza, C. (2020). Grid Index: Tracking The global leadership response in the Covid-19 Crisis. Şubat 2022, https://www.cmawebline.org/ontarget/gridindex-tracking-the-global-leadership-response-in-the-covid-19-crisis
  21. Einarsen, S., Aasland, M.S. ve Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: a definition and conceptual model. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 207-216.
  22. Elsa, E. (2020). COVID-19: Places with the best coronavirus responses have one thing in common - women leaders. Şubat 2022, https://gulfnews.com/world/covid-19-places-with-the-best-coronavirus-responses-have-one-thing-in-common---women-leaders-1.
  23. Euronews. (2022, 10 Şubat). Germany’s Angela Merkel comes out top in leaders’approval poll for covid-19 crisis, https://www.euronews.com/2020/05/28/germany-s-angela-merkel-comes-out-top-in-leaders-approval-poll-for-covid-19-crisis
  24. Eren, E. (2000). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikolojisi. 6. baskı, İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayınları.
  25. Erickson A., Shaw B., Murray J. ve Branch S. (2015). Destructive leadership: Causes, consequences, and countermeasures. Organizational Dynamics 44, 266-272.
  26. Fincher, L. H. (2022, 10 Şubat). Women leaders are doing a disproportionately great job at handling the pandemic. So why aren’t there more of them? https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/14/asia/women-government-leaders-coronavirus-hnk-intl/index.html
  27. Fisher, R. J. (2000). “Intergroup conflict”, in Deutsch, M. and Coleman, P.T. (Eds), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San-Francisco, CA, 166-185.
  28. Harkins, W.D. ve Copeland, L. E. (1942). A Superliquid in two dimensions and a first order change in a condensed monolayer I. energy, compressibility, and order of phase transformations. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 10(5), 272-286.
  29. Helms, L., Esch, F.V. ve Crawford, B. (2019) Merkel III: From committed pragmatist to ‘conviction leader’?. German Politics, 28(3), 350-370.
  30. Hunt, J. G., Boal, K. B. ve Sorenson R.L. (1990). Top management leadership: Inside the black box, The Leadership Quarterly, 1(1), 41-65.
  31. Hunter, S.T., Bedell-Avers, Katrina E. ve Mumford, M.D. (2007). The Typical leadership study: assumptions, ımplications and potential remedies, The Leadership Quarterly, 18(5), 435-446.
  32. Jacobsen, C. ve House, R. J. (2001). Dynamics of charismatic leadership: A process theory, simulation model, and tests. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 75−112.
  33. Jong, J. P. J. ve Hartog, D.N.D. (2007), How leaders influence employees’innovative behaviour, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 10 No. 1, 41-64.
  34. Immelman, A. (2017). The leadership style of U.S. president Donald J. Trump (Working Paper No. 1.2). Collegeville and St. Joseph, MN: St. John’s University and the College of St. Benedict, Unit for the Study of Personality in Politics. https://digitalcom-mons.csbsju.edu/psychology_pubs/107/
  35. Kaya, S. (2023, 12 Mart). Rusya Federasyonu ülke profili, İzmir Ticaret Odası İş Geliştirme Müdürlüğü, İzmir, https://api.izto.org.tr/storage/Documents/original/3k1M0wbncFJqVR1P.pdf
  36. Klein, K. J. ve House, R. J. (1998). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. In F. Dansereau ve F.J. Yammarino (Ed.), Leadership: The multiple level approach içinde (2-33) Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
  37. Koontz H. ve O’Donnell, C. (1955). Principles of management: An analysis of managerial functions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  38. Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). Toxic leadership: When grand illusions masquerade as noble visions. Leader to Leader, Spring, 29-36.
  39. Maral, M. (2016). Okul yöneticilerinin liderlik stilleri ile çatışma çözme stratejileri arasındaki ilişki. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
  40. Mumford, E. (1906). The origins of leadership. American Journal of Sociology, 12(2), 216- 240.
  41. Mumford M. D. (2006). Pathways to outstanding leadership: a comparative analysis of charismatic, ıdeological, and pragmatic leaders. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, publishers, Mahwah.
  42. Mumford M. D., Antes A. L., Caughron J. J. ve Friedrich T.L. (2008). Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership: Multi-level ınfluences on emergence and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 144–160.
  43. Mumford M. D. (2010). Leadership 101. New York: Springer Publishing Company, LLC.
  44. Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership theory and practice, Fourth Edition, Usa: Sage Publication, California.
  45. Özal, E. (2023, 9 Mart). Birleşik Krallık Ülke Bilgi Notu, Adana Sanayi Odası, Adana. https://www.adaso.org.tr/Content/WebDosyalar/Yayinlar/%C3%9Clke%20Raporlar%C4%B1Y%C3%B6netici%20%C3%96zetleri/Birle%C5%9Fik%20Krall%C4%B1k%20%C3%9Clke%20Raporu.pdf
  46. Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Bago, B. ve Rand, D. (2021). Predictors of attitudes and misperceptions about COVID-19 in Canada, the UK, and the USA, In Press, Personility and Social Psychology Bulletin.
  47. Picheta, R. ve Yeung, J. (2022, 24 Şubat). Trump announced the US will Pull out of the WHO. What does that Actually Mean? CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/19/us/trump-whofunding-threat-explainer-intl/index.html
  48. Pierre, J.C. (2016). The influence of ancient chinese wisdom on the conceptualization and practice of leadership in Mainland China. Doctoral Dissertation, California: Saybrook University.
  49. Pilkington, E. ve McCarthy, T. (2022, 16 Şubat). The missing six weeks: How Trump failed the biggest test of his life. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/28/trump-coronavirus-politics-us-health-disaster
  50. Ployhart, R. E. ve Schneider, B. (2002). A multi-level perspective on personnel selection research and practice: Implications for selection system design, assessment, and construct validation. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Ed.), The many faces of multi-level issues içinde (95−140), UK: Elsevier.
  51. Reyhanoğlu, M. ve Akın, Ö. (2016). Toksik liderlik örgütsel sağlığı olumsuz yönde tetikler mi?. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, Ekonomi Özel Sayısı, 442-459. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/itobiad/issue/22154/237995
  52. Rosenthal S.A. ve Pittinsky T.L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. Leadership Quarterly 17(6), 617–633.
  53. Saygınar, M.S. (2006). Hava sınıf okulları ve teknik eğitim merkezi komutanlığında görev yapan okul yöneticilerinin öğretimsel liderlik davranışları. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  54. Simonsen, S. G. (2000). Putin's leadership style: Ethnocentric patriotism. Security Dialogue, 31(3), 377-380
  55. Shamir B., House, R. J. ve Arthur, M.B. (1993). The Motivational effects of charismatic leadership:A Self-Concept Based Theory. Organizational Science, 4(4), 577-594.
  56. Souba, W. (2014). The phenomenology of leadership. Open Journal Of Leadership, 3(4), 77-105.
  57. Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.
  58. De Swielande, T.S. (2020). Trump and Covid-19: The arrogance of ignorance (No: 68). CECRI. https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:229759
  59. Sutherland, J.J. ve Cameron, R.R. (2015). Employing phenomenology to highlight the richness of the leadership experience. Proceedings Of The European Conference On E-Learning, 365-373.
  60. Takala, T. (2010). Dark leadership, charisma and trust. Psychology, 1(1), 59-63.
  61. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Dışişleri Bakanlığı (2023a, 14 Mart). Almanya Federal Cumhuriyeti’nin Siyasi Görünümü. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/almanya-siyasi-gorunumu.tr.mfa
  62. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Dışişleri Bakanlığı (2023e, 14 Mart). Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Ülke Künyesi. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/amerika-birlesik-devletleri-kunyesi.tr.mfa
  63. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Dışişleri Bakanlığı (2023c, 14 Mart). Birleşik Krallık’ın Siyasi Görünümü. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/ingiltere-siyasi-gorunumu.tr.mfa
  64. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Dışişleri Bakanlığı (2023d, 14 Mart). Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti’nin Siyasi Görünümü. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/cin-halk-cumhuriyeti-siyasi-gorunumu.tr.mfa
  65. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Dışişleri Bakanlığı (2023b, 14 Mart). Rusya Federasyonu’nun Siyasi Görünümü. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/rusya-siyasi-gorunumu.tr.mfa
  66. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Ticaret Bakanlığı (2023, 9 Mart). Birleşik Krallık Ülke Profili, Uluslararası Anlaşmalar ve Avrupa Birliği Genel Müdürlüğü, https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/5ebe9fea13b876cbbc365429/Birle%C5%9Fik%20Krall%C4%B1k%20%C3%9Clke%20Profili_Ekim2022.pdf
  67. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Ticaret Bakanlığı (2023b, 9 Mart). Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti Ülke Profili. https://ticaret.gov.tr/yurtdisi-teskilati/dogu-asya/cin-halk-cumhuriyeti/genel-bilgiler
  68. Uchoa, P. (2022, 16 Şubat). Covid: Pandemiyle mücadelede neden bazı ülkeler başarılı, bazıları ise başarısız oldu? https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-55699746
  69. Van Wart, M. (2013). Lessons from leadership theory and the contemporary challenges of leaders. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 553-565.
  70. Whicker, M.L. (1996). Toxic leaders: When organizations go bad. Westport, VA: Quorum Books.
  71. Wittenberg-Cox, A. (2022, 16 Şubat). What do countries with the best coronavirus responses have ın common? women leaders, https://www.forbes.com/sites/avivahwittenbergcox/2020/04/13/what-do-countries-with-the-best-coronavirus-reponses-have-in-common-women-leaders/#4db2a0e3dec4
  72. World Population Review, (2022, 16 Şubat). Total Population by Country 2022, https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries
  73. World Health Organization, (2022, 16 Şubat). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard, https://covid19.who.int
  74. Yancey-Bragg, N. (2022, 16 Şubat). Female world leaders are handling coronavirus crisis ‘in a really ımpressive manner,’experts say. https://www.usato-day.com/story/news/world/2020/04/17/coronavirus-women-world-leaders-praised-handling-crisis/5144421002/
  75. Yılan, Y. (2022). Sıra dışı liderlik tarzlarının algılanan örgütsel politikaya etkisinde örgüt kültürünün aracılık rolü. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Afyonkarahisar.
  76. Zaccaro, S. J., Gilbert, J., Thor, K. K. ve Mumford, M. D. (1991). Leadership and social intelligence: Linking social perceptiveness and behavioral flexibility to leader effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 317−331.
  77. Zaccaro, S. J., Gualtieri, J. ve Minionis, D. (1995). Task cohesion as a facilitator of team decision making under temporal urgency. Military Psychology, 7, 77−93. Zaleznik, A. (1977). Managers and leaders: Are they different? Harvard Business Review, March-April, 67-78.