SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 23

Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Organizational Innovation

Örgütsel İnovasyon Üzerine Yapılan Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Esra Sipahi Döngül(AKSARAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-6495-4378
Pages
117–132
Publication Date
2024-02-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study is limited to the bibliometric analysis of studies scanned in the WOS database between the years 1980 and 2023.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Organizational innovation research covers an important area aimed at understanding and developing the creative and innovative processes of organizations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it is aimed at revealing the impact of the study by visually presenting the analysis of the studies on "organizational innovation." Bibliometric analysis of studies published in the Web of Science (WOS) database between the years 1980 and 2023 was analyzed with the VOSviewer (Version 1.6.9) package program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study is limited to the bibliometric analysis of studies scanned in the WOS database between the years 1980 and 2023.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:inovasyon · örgütsel inovasyon · örgütsel bilgi

Abstract

Organizational innovation research covers an important area aimed at understanding and developing the creative and innovative processes of organizations. In this study, it is aimed at revealing the impact of the study by visually presenting the analysis of the studies on "organizational innovation." Bibliometric analysis of studies published in the Web of Science (WOS) database between the years 1980 and 2023 was analyzed with the VOSviewer (Version 1.6.9) package program. Since it is aimed at scanning the title, content, and keyword containing the concept of "organizational innovation" in all languages and all publication types, 4300 works were accessed and analyzed. Looking at the year-based distribution, the year with the most publications is 2022, with 334 works. The most common publication type is journal articles, with 3,273 works per year. It has been determined that the most published works are in English with 4,110 works. In the study, when the most used keywords with a relationship between them were analyzed at least 2 times, the most commonly used keywords were found to be organizational innovation (756 repetitions), innovation (437 repetitions), and knowledge management (92 repetitions). This study is limited to the bibliometric analysis of studies scanned in the WOS database between the years 1980 and 2023.

Özet

Örgütsel inovasyon araştırmaları, örgütlerin yaratıcı ve yenilikçi süreçlerini anlamaya ve geliştirmeye yönelik önemli bir alanı kapsamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, “örgütsel inovasyon (organizational innovation)” ile ilgili yapılan çalışmaların analizi görsel olarak sunularak çalışmanın etkisinin ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Web of Science (WOS) veri tabanında 1980-2023 yıl aralığında yayınlanmış olan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi VOSviewer (Version 1.6.9) paket programı ile analiz edilmiştir. “organizational innovation” kavramının yer aldığı başlık, içerik ve anahtar kelimesinin tüm dillerde ve ayrıca tüm yayın türlerinde taranması amaçlandığından 4.300 esere erişilerek analizler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yıl bazlı dağılıma bakıldığında, en fazla yayın yapılan yıl 334 eser ile 2022 yılıdır. En fazla yayın türü yıl 3.273 eser ile dergi makalesidir. Yayınlanan eserler en fazla 4.110 eser ile İngilizce dilindedir. Çalışmada en az 2 defa olmak koşuluyla aralarında ilişki bulunan ve en çok kullanılan anahtar kelimeler analiz edildiğinde, anahtar kelimelerden en fazla kullanılanlar organizational innovation (örgütsel inovasyon) (756 tekrar), innovation (inovasyon) (437 tekrar) ve knowledge management (bilgi yönetimi) (92 tekrar) olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, 1980-2023 yıl aralığında WOS veri tabanında taranan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi ile sınırlıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Döngül, E. S. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Organizational Innovation. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 23, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1359997

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations. Harvard Business School Background Note, 396-239.
  2. Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S. ve Lay, G. (2008). Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation, 28(10), 644-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.003
  3. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. ve Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
  4. Crossan, M. M. ve Apaydın, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
  5. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256406
  6. Damanpour, F. (2020). Organizational innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. de Castro, G.M., Verde, M.D., Sáez, P.L. ve López, J.E.N. (2010). Technological Innovation. Technological Innovation içinde (s. 46-72). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281462_3
  7. Jiménez-Jiménez, D. ve Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010
  8. Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P. ve Palacios-Man, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance An empirical research in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 2374-2383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.038
  9. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  10. Rodrigues Alves, M. F., Vasconcelos Ribeiro Galina, S. ve Dobelin, S. (2018). Literature on organizational innovation: Past and future. Innovation & Management Review, 15(1), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-01-2018-001
  11. Sipahi Döngül, E. (2023). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti üzerine yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(Özel Sayı), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.1353210
  12. Van Eck, N. J. ve Waltman, L. (2023, 05 Şubat). VOSviewer manual. VOSviewer: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.19.pdf
  13. Zheng, W., Yang, B. Ve McLean, G. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 763-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.06.005