SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 26

The Effect of Defense Spending and Institutional Quality on Income Inequality: Fresh Evidence from Türkiye

Savunma Harcamaları ve Kurumsal Kalitenin Gelir Eşitsizliğine Etkisi: Türkiye’den Yeni Kanıtlar

Burhan Durgun(DİCLE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7742-6059
Pages
234–256
Publication Date
2025-02-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To mitigate these challenges, it is imperative to enhance social protection expenditures for low-income groups, ensure the efficiency of defense spending, and devise macroeconomic policies that do not engender inflationary pressures in markets.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Defense spending, which is purported to be a contributing factor to inequality, has received scant attention in the extant literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study investigates the effects of defence spending, misery index, growth and institutional quality on income inequality in Türkiye for the period 1988-2023.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To mitigate these challenges, it is imperative to enhance social protection expenditures for low-income groups, ensure the efficiency of defense spending, and devise macroeconomic policies that do not engender inflationary pressures in markets.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Savunma harcamaları · gelir eşitsizliği · sefalet endeksi

Abstract

Defense spending, which is purported to be a contributing factor to inequality, has received scant attention in the extant literature. Given Türkye's imperative to allocate resources to defense in order to address security concerns arising from its geographical context, and concurrently, the necessity to curtail income inequality within the nation, a comprehensive understanding of the defense spending and inequality nexus is imperative. This study investigates the effects of defence spending, misery index, growth and institutional quality on income inequality in Türkiye for the period 1988-2023. Using the RALS-ADL cointegration method, the long-run relationship was confirmed. The long-run elasticities indicate a U-shaped relationship between growth and inequality. In addition, misery index and defense spending are found to increase inequality and the effect of institutional quality is insignificant. The existence of a U-shaped relationship implies that growth will increase inequality in the long run. This phenomenon is further exacerbated by an increase in defense spending and a high inflation rate. The fact that the level of institutional quality is far from having an equalizing effect also presents a negative scenario for Türkiye. To mitigate these challenges, it is imperative to enhance social protection expenditures for low-income groups, ensure the efficiency of defense spending, and devise macroeconomic policies that do not engender inflationary pressures in markets.

Özet

Eşitsizliğe etki eden faktörlerden biri olduğu ileri sürülen savunma harcamaları, ilgili literatürde kısıtlı bir alan kaplamaktadır. Türkiye’nin bulunduğu coğrafyadan kaynaklı olarak karşı karşıya kaldığı güvenlik risklerini azaltmak için savunma harcaması yapmak zorunda olması ve ülke içinde artan gelir eşitsizliği nedeniyle savunma harcamaları ve eşitsizlik bağının anlaşılması önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, 1988-2023 döneminde Türkiye’de savunma harcamaları, sefalet endeksi, büyüme ve kurumsal kalitenin gelir eşitsizliğine etkisi araştırılmıştır. RALS-ADL eşbütünleşme yönteminin kullanıldığı çalışmada uzun dönem ilişkisi doğrulanmıştır. Uzun dönem esneklikleri, büyüme ile eşitsizlik arasında düz U şekilli bir ilişkinin olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca sefalet endeksi ve savunma harcamalarının eşitsizliği arttırdığı ve kurumsal kalitenin etkisinin anlamsız olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Düz U şekilli ilişkinin varlığı büyümenin uzun vadede eşitsizlik yaratacağını ifade etmektedir. Buna ek olarak eşitsizliğin artan savunma harcamaları ve yüksek enflasyonist süreçle daha da derinleşebileceği öngörülmektedir. Kurumsal kalite düzeyinin eşitleyici etkiden uzak olması da yine Türkiye açısından olumsuz bir tablo ortaya koymaktadır. Düşük gelirli kesime yönelik sosyal koruma harcamalarının arttırılmasının yanında, savunma harcamalarında etkinliğin sağlanması ve makroekonomik politikaların piyasalar üzerinde enflasyonist baskı yaratmayacak şekilde tasarlanması gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Durgun, B. (2025). The Effect of Defense Spending and Institutional Quality on Income Inequality: Fresh Evidence from Türkiye. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 26, 234–256. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1615428

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (148)

  1. Abell, J. D. (1994). Military spending and income inequality. Journal of Peace Research, 31(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343394031001004
  2. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. ve Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1367-1401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
  3. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. ve Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth, In: Handbook of Economic Growth, Chapter 6. Edited by Philippe Aghion and Steven Durlauf. North Holland: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3
  4. Acheampong, A. O., Adebayo, T. S., Dzator, J. ve Koomson, I. (2023). Income inequality and economic growth in BRICS: insights from non parametric techniques. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 21, 619-640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-023-09567-9
  5. Adeleye, B. N. (2024). Income inequality, human capital and institutional quality in sub-Saharan Africa. Social Indicators Research, 171(1), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03244-0
  6. Afonso, O. ve Sequeira, T. (2023). The effect of inflation on wage inequality: a north–south monetary model of endogenous growth with international trade. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 55(1), 215-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12914
  7. Afriyie, J. K., Twumasi-Ankrah, S., Gyamfi, K. B., Arthur, D. ve Pels, W. A. (2020). Evaluating the performance of unit root tests in single time series processes. Mathematics and Statistics, 8(6), 656-664. https://doi.org/10.13189/ms.2020.080605
  8. Ahluwalia, M. S. (1976). Inequality, poverty and development. Journal of Development Economics, 3(4), 307-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(76)90027-4
  9. Ak, M. Z. ve Altıntaş, N. (2016). Kuznets’in ters U eğrisi bağlamında Türkiye’de gelir eşitsizliği ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: 1986-2012. Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 93-102. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/finance/issue/61462/917902
  10. Aksoğan, G. ve Elveren, A. Y. (2012). Türkiye’de savunma, sağlık ve eğitim harcamaları ve gelir eşitsizliği (1970-2008): Ekonometrik bir inceleme. Sosyoekonomi, 17(17), 263-280. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sosyoekonomi/issue/21077/226930
  11. Alesina, A. ve Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465-490. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118470
  12. Ali, H. E. (2007). Military expenditures and inequality: empirical evidence from global data. Defence and Peace Economics, 18(6), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690701331501
  13. Ali, H. E. (2012). military expenditures and inequality in the middle east and North Africa: a panel analysis. Defence and Peace Economics, 23(6), 575-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2012.663578
  14. Asamoah, L. A. (2021). Institutional quality and income inequality in developing countries: a dynamic panel threshold analysis. Progress in Development Studies, 21(2), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993421101671 Avcı, M. ve Mukiyen Avcı, G. (2017). OECD ülkelerinde kurumsal kalite ve gelir eşitsizliği ilişkisi. Sosyoekonomi, 25(31), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.288624
  15. Ayla, D. (2020). NEXT 11 ekonomilerinde hoşnutsuzluk endeksi ve gelir dağılımı incelemesi. L. Y. Eser ve S. Samut (Ed.) İktisat Seçme Yazılar 2020-II içinde (s. 139-156). Celepler Matbaası, Trabzon.
  16. Balcilar, M., Gupta, R., Ma, W., & Makena, P. (2021). Income inequality and economic growth: A re‐examination of theory and evidence. Review of Development Economics, 25(2), 737-757. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12754
  17. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. J. ve Mestre, R. (1998). Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9892.00091
  18. Barro, R. J. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), S158-S183. https://doi.org/10.1086/250107
  19. Barro, R. J. (1996). Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country study. (NBER Working Paper No. 5698). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w5698/w5698.pdf
  20. Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009850119329
  21. Bayer, C. ve Hanck, C. (2008). Is double trouble? How to combine cointegration tests. Ruhr Economic Papers, (48). https://doi.org/10.26481/umamet.2008014
  22. Bayer, C. ve Hanck, C. (2012). Combining non-cointegration tests. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 34(1), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2012.00814.x
  23. Beji, S. (2019). Financial openness and income inequality: Do institutions matter for Africa? Economics Bulletin, 39(1), 104-114. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3322670
  24. Benoit, E. (1978). Growth and defense in developing countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26(2), 271-280. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1153245
  25. Benos, N. ve Karagiannis, S. (2018). Inequality and growth in the united states: why physical and human capital matter. Economic Inquiry, 56(1), 572-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12475
  26. Beşkaya, A. (2013). Political economy of economic discomfort: a time series analysis of Turkey, 1980-2010. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(1), 1-14. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/esad/issue/6061/81506
  27. Biscione, A. ve Caruso, R. (2021). Military expenditures and income inequality evidence from a panel of transition countries (1990-2015). Defence And Peace Economics, 32(1), 46-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2019.1661218
  28. Bittencourt, M. (2009). Macroeconomic performance and inequality: Brazil, 1983-94. The Developing Economies, 47(1), 30-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2009.00075.x
  29. Blancheton, B. ve Chhorn, D. (2021). Government intervention, institutional quality, and income inequality: evidence from Asia and the Pacific, 1988-2014. Asian Development Review, 38(1), 176-206. https://doi.org/10.1162/adev_a_00162
  30. Boel, P. (2018). The redistributive effects of inflation and the shape of money demand. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 90, 208-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2018.02.011
  31. Boswijk, H. P. (1994). Testing for an unstable root in conditional and unconditional error correction models. Journal of Econometrics, 63, 37-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(93)01560-9
  32. Braun, M., Parro, F. ve Valenzuela, P. (2019). Does finance alter the relation between inequality and growth?. Economic Inquiry, 57(1), 410-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12581
  33. Breunig, R. ve Majeed, O. (2020). Inequality, poverty, and growth. International Economics, 161(C) 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2019.11.005
  34. Brueckner, M. ve Lederman, D. (2018). Inequality and economic growth: The role of initial income. Journal of Economic Growth, 23(3), 341-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-018-9156-4
  35. Castells-Quintana, D. ve Royuela, V. (2012). Unemployment and long-run economic growth: the role of income inequality and urbanisation. Investigaciones Regionales-Journal of Regional Research, (24), 153-173. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/289/28924660007.pdf
  36. Chen, M. Y. (2002). Testing stationarity against unit roots and structural changes. Applied Economics Letters, 9(7), 459-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850110091895
  37. Chong, A. ve Calderon, C. (2000). Causality and feedback between institutional measures and economic growth. Economics & Politics, 12(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00069
  38. Chu, A. C., Cozzi, G., Fan, H., Furukawa, Y. ve Liao, C. H. (2019). Innovation and inequality in a monetary Schumpeterian model with heterogeneous households and firms. Review of Economic Dynamics, 34, 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2019.03.006
  39. Clarke, G. R., Xu, L. C. ve Zou, H. F. (2006). Finance and income inequality: what do the data tell us?. Southern Economic Journal, 72(3), 578-596. https://doi.org/10.2307/20111834
  40. Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Altman, D.,. & Ziblatt, D. (2024). V-Dem Dataset v14. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/mcwt-fr58
  41. Çakmak, A. İ. ve Tosun, B. (2017). Ekonomik büyüme-gelir dağılımı ilişkisi: Kuznets hipotezinin seçilmiş ülkeler üzerine araştırılması. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 33, 33-44. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kosbed/issue/43231/524877
  42. Çenberci, E. (2019). Defense expenditures and income inequality: evidence from chosen Euro Using Countries. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(6), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.472974
  43. Deininger, K. ve Squire, L. (1998). New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 57(2), 259-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00099-6
  44. Desbordes, R. ve Verardi, V. (2012). Refitting the Kuznets curve. Economics Letters, 116(2), 258-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.03.010
  45. Dickey, D. A. ve Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348
  46. Dişbudak, C. ve Süslü, B. (2009). Kalkınma ve bireysel gelir dağılımı: Kuznets hipotezi Türkiye için geçerli mi?. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(18), 146-166. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auiibfd/issue/32320/359154
  47. Doré, N. I. ve Teixeira, A. A. (2023). The role of human capital, structural change, and institutional quality on Brazil's economic growth over the last two hundred years (1822–2019). Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 66, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2023.04.003
  48. El Herradi, M., Haan, J. ve Leroy, A. (2022). Inflation and the income share of the rich: evidence for 14 OECD countries. Review of Income and Wealth, 69(1), 170-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12580
  49. Elhini, M. ve Hammam, R. (2021). An empirical examination of the impact of economic structural change on income inequality: dynamic heterogeneous panel approach. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(1), 136-152. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p136
  50. Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J. ve Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813-836. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2171846
  51. Elveren, A. Y. (2012). Military spending and income inequality: evidence on cointegration and causality for Turkey, 1963–2007. Defence and Peace Economics, 23(3), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2011.578414
  52. Engle, R. F. ve Granger, C. W. J (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
  53. Fawaz, F., Rahnama, M. ve Valcarcel, V. J. (2014). A refinement of the relationship between economic growth and income inequality. Applied Economics, 46(27), 3351-3361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.929624
  54. Fisher, R. (1932). Statistical methods for research workers. London: Oliver and Boyd
  55. Forbes, K. J. (2000). A Reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 869–887. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.869
  56. Gakuru, E. ve Yang, S. (2024). Misery index improvement: a review based on theoretical and empirical evidence. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02052-2
  57. Galbraith, J. K. (2012). Inequality and instability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  58. Galbraith, J. K. ve Kum, H. (2003). Inequality and economic growth: a global view based on measures of pay. CESifo Economic Studies, 49(4), 527-556. https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/49.4.527
  59. Ghosh, S. (2022). Analysing the nexus between income inequality and military expenditure in top ten defence expenditure economies. Quality & Quantity, 56, 689-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01140-8
  60. Gnangnon, S. K. (2020). Aid for trade flows and wage inequality in the manufacturing sector of recipient-countries. Journal of Economic Integration, 35(4), 643-683. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2020.35.4.643
  61. Govindaraju, V. C. ve Tang, C. F. (2013). The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, economic growth and coal consumption in China and India. Applied Energy, 104, 310-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.042
  62. Göcen, S. (2021). Ekonomik büyüme ve gelir eşitsizliği ilişkisi: Türkiye için bölgesel bazda bir inceleme. Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(IERFM Özel Sayısı), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1020478
  63. Grabia, T. (2011). The Okun misery index in the European Union countries from 2000 to 2009. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 14(4), 97-115. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/259091
  64. Gustafsson, B. ve Johansson, M. (1999). In search of smoking guns: what makes income inequality vary over time in different countries? American Sociological Review, 64(4), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312249906400408
  65. Günlük-Senesen, G. (2002). Budgetary trade-offs of security expenditures in Turkey. Defence and Peace Economics, 13(5), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690213509
  66. Hall, R. E. ve Jones, C. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83-116. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399555954
  67. Hepsağ, A. (2022). Ekonometrik zaman serileri analizlerinde güncel yöntemler (WinRATS uygulamalı). İstanbul: Der Yayınları.
  68. Hirnissa, M. T., Habibullah, M. Z. ve Baharom, A. H. (2009). Defense spending and income inequality: evidence from selected Asian countries. Modern Applied Science, 3(5), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v3n5p96
  69. Huang, H. C., Lin, Y. C. ve Yeh, C. C. (2012). An appropriate test of the Kuznets hypothesis. Applied Economics Letters, 19(1), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2011.566172
  70. Huynh, C. M. (2021). Foreign direct investment and income inequality: does institutional quality matter? The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(8), 1231–1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2021.1942164
  71. Jantti, M. (1994). A more efficient estimate of the effects of macroeconomic activity on the distribution of income. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(2), 372-378. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109895
  72. Johansen S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
  73. Jones, E. L. (1987). The European miracle: environments, economies, and geopolitics in the history of Europe and Asia. Cambridge University Press.
  74. Kasap, A. (2023). Hanke sefalet endeksi ile demografik ve sosyal göstergeler arasındaki ilişkinin ampirik analizi: kırılgan beşli örneği. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(1), 146-160. https://doi.org/10.48145/gopsbad.1291877
  75. Kentor, J., Jorgenson, A. K. ve Kick, E. (2012). The “new” military and income inequality: a cross national analysis. Social Science Research, 41(3), 514–526. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.12.005
  76. Kim, H. ve Rhee, D. E. (2022). The effects of asset prices on income inequality: redistribution policy does matter. Economic Modelling, 113, 105899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105899
  77. Knack, S. ve Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7(3), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x
  78. Korrani, S. S. ve Zia, A. (2023). The effect of economic growth and misery index on income inequality in Iran (Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL)). International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 14(3), 343-351. https://doi.org/10.22075/ijnaa.2022.25988.3181
  79. Kunawotor, M. E., Bokpin, G. A. ve Barnor, C. (2020). Drivers of income inequality in Africa: does institutional quality matter?. African Development Review, 32(4), 718-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12473
  80. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581
  81. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C., Schmidt, P. ve Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
  82. Law, C. H. ve Soon, S. V. (2020). The impact of inflation on income inequality: the role of institutional quality. Applied Economics Letters, 27(21), 1735–1738. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1717425
  83. Lee, H., Lee, J. ve Im, K. (2015). More powerful cointegration tests with non-normal errors. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 19(4), 397-413. https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2013-0060
  84. Lin, E. S. ve Ali, H. E. (2009). Military spending and inequality: panel Granger causality test. Journal of Peace Research, 46(5), 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343309339247
  85. Lin, E. S., Ali, H. E. ve Lu, Y. L. (2015). Does military spending crowd out social welfare expenditures? evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Defence and Peace Economics, 26(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2013.848576
  86. Lin, F. ve Fu, D. (2016). Trade, institution quality and income inequality. World Development, 77, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.017
  87. Majeed, M. T. (2016). Economic growth and income inequality nexus: an empirical analysis for Pakistan. Kashmir Economic Review, 25(1), 1–12. https://www.ker.org.pk/index.php/ker/article/view/162
  88. Mdingi, K. ve Ho, S. Y. (2021). Literature review on income inequality and economic growth. MethodsX, 8, 101402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101402
  89. Meng, B., Lucyshyn, W. ve Li. X. (2015). Defense expenditure and income inequality: evidence on co-integration and causality for China. Defence and Peace Economics, 26(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2013.810026
  90. Michael, C. ve Stelios, R. (2020). The efect of military spending on income inequality: evidence from NATO countries. Empirical Economics, 58, 1305–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1576-7
  91. Milanovic, B. (2018). Küresel eşitsizlik; küreselleşme çağı için yeni bir yaklaşım, (Çev. Meneviş Uzbay, Mustafa Pirili), Efil Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  92. Mocan, H. N. (1999). Structural unemployment, cyclical unemployment, and income inequality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(1), 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465399767923872
  93. Monnin, P. (2014). Inflation and income inequality in developed economies. (CEP Working Paper No. 1401). Council on Economic Policies. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2444710
  94. Moradi, F., Jafari, M. ve Fatahi, S. (2022). The impact of misery index and corruption control on income inequality (With the Quantile Approach). Applied Economics Studies Iran (AESI), 10(40), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.22084/aes.2021.23587.3246
  95. Nawaz, S., Iqbal, N. ve Khan, M. A. (2014). The impact of institutional quality on economic growth: panel evidence. The Pakistan Development Review, 53(1), 15-31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24397923
  96. Nessen, R. (2008). Arthur Okun father of the misery index. Washington, DC: Opinion - The Brookings Institution.
  97. Niyimbanira, F. (2017). Analysis of the impact of economic growth on income inequality and poverty in South Africa: the case of Mpumalanga province. International Journal Economics Financial Issues, 7(4), 254–261. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijefi/issue/32006/353543
  98. North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. Norton
  99. Oczki, J., Muszyńska, J. ve Wędrowska, E. (2017). Kuznets hypothesis of income inequality: empirical evidence from EU. https://repozytorium.umk.pl/handle/item/4909
  100. Ofluoğlu, N. Ö., Artan, S. ve Kalaycı, C. (2018). Kurumsal kalite, ekonomik özgürlükler ve gelir dağılımı ilişkisi: MINT ülkeleri örneği. Hak İş Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, 7(17), 90-107. https://doi.org/10.31199/hakisderg.386514
  101. Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: economic growth. stagflation, and social rigidities. Yale University Press.
  102. Ongo Nkoa, B. E. ve Song, J. S. (2022). Does institutional quality increase inequalities in Africa?. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 1896-1927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00771-4
  103. Osode, O. E., Iheonu, C. O. ve Dauda, R. (2022). On the relationship between globalization and income inequality: does institution matter?. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(2), e2433. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2433
  104. Özer, M. O. (2019). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde iktisadi hoşnutsuzluk endeksi ile cari açık arasındaki ilişki. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İktisat Anabilim Dalı Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.
  105. Panizza, U. (2002). Income, inequality and economic growth: evidence from American data. Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013414509803
  106. Papadopoulos, G. (2019). Income inequality, consumption, credit and credit risk in a data-driven agent-based model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 104, 39-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2019.05.002
  107. Papanek, G. F. ve Kyn, O. (1986). The effect on income distribution of development, the growth rate and economic strategy. Journal of Development Economics, 23(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(86)90079-9
  108. Partridge, M. (1997). Is inequality harmful for growth? comment. The American Economic Review, 87(5), 1019–1032. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951339
  109. Paukert, F. (1973). Income distribution at different levels of development: survey of evidence. International Labour Review, 108(3), 97-126.
  110. Perotti, R. (1996). Growth, income distribution and democracy: what the data say. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 149–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138861
  111. Persson, T. ve Tabellini, G. (1994). Is inequality harmful for growth? theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 84(3), 600–621. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118070
  112. Phillips, P. C. ve Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297545
  113. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  114. Pradhan, R. P., Bahmani, S. ve Abraham, R. (2021). Institutional quality, insurance markets, and economic growth: evidence from pooled mean group estimation. Applied Economics Letters, 30(4), 445–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1991561
  115. Ram, R. (1991). Kuznets's inverted-U hypothesis: evidence from a highly developed country. Southern Economic Journal, 57(4), 1112-1123. https://doi.org/10.2307/1060338
  116. Rangel, L. A., Andrade, J. ve Divin, J. A. (2002). Economic growth and income inequality in brazil: analysing the comparable minimum areas. Working Paper, Brazilian Institute for Applied Economic Research and University of Brasilia, Brazil.
  117. Raza, S. A., Shahbaz, M. ve Paramati, S. R. (2017). Dynamics of military expenditure and income inequality in Pakistan. Social Indicators Research, 131, 1035-1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1284-7
  118. Redek, T. ve Sušjan, A. (2005). The impact of institutions on economic growth: the case of transition economies. Journal of Economic Issues, 39(4), 995-1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2005.11506864
  119. Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for high-quality growth: what they are and how to acquire them. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35, 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02699764
  120. Roser, M. ve Cuaresma, J. C. (2016). Why is income inequality increasing in the developed world? Review of Income and Wealth, 62(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12153
  121. Royuela, V., Veneri, P. ve Ramos, R. (2019). The short-run relationship between inequality and growth: evidence from OECD regions during the Great Recession. Regional Studuies, 53(4), 574-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1476752
  122. Ruiz-Huerta, J., Martínez, R. ve Ayala, L. (1999). Earnings inequality, unemployment and income distribution in the OECD. (LIS Working Paper No. 214). Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), Luxembourg. http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/214.pdf
  123. Scholl, N. ve Klasen, S. (2019). Re-estimating the relationship between inequality and growth. Oxford Economic Papers, 71(4), 824–847. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpy059
  124. Seiglie, C. (1997). Deficits, defense and income redistribution. The Cato Journal, 17(1), 11-21. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1553355
  125. Shahbaz, M. (2010). Income inequality, economic growth and nonlinearity: a case of Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 37(8), 613–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068291011060652
  126. Shahbaz, M., Sherafatian-Jahromi, R., Malik, M. N., Shabbir, M. S. ve Jam, F. A. (2016). Linkages between defense spending and income inequality in Iran. Quality & Quantity, 50, 1317-1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0207-z
  127. Sharif, A. ve Afshan, S. (2018). Does military spending impede income inequality? a comparative study of Pakistan and India. Global Business Review, 19(2), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917713523
  128. Sheng, Y. (2011). Unemployment and income inequality: A puzzling finding from the US in 1941-2010. Available at SSRN 2020744. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2020744
  129. Sherani, S. (2019). Institutional reforms in Pakistan: Missing piece of the development puzzle. In S. S. Aneel, U. T. Haroon, & I. Niazi (Ed.), 70 years of development: The way forward (s. 39-61). Islamabad, Pakistan: Sang-e-Meel Publications. https://tinyurl.com/22jfsyuu
  130. Siddiqui, D. A. ve Ahmed, Q. M. (2013). The effect of institutions on economic growth: a global analysis based on GMM dynamic panel estimation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24, 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2012.12.001
  131. Sintos, A. (2023). Does inflation worsen income inequality? a meta-analysis. Economic Systems, 47(4), 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101146
  132. Solarin, S.A. (2017). Disaggregated military expenditure and the debt level in Nigeria. Quality & Quantity, 51, 1687–1705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0360-z
  133. Solt, F. (2020). Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: the standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly 101(3), 1183-1199. SWIID Version 9.6, December 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12795
  134. Taş, S., Örnek, İ. ve Aksoğan, G. (2013). Türkiye’de savunma harcamaları, büyüme ve gelir eşitsizliği, 1970-2008: ekonometrik bir inceleme. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(3), 659-682. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jss/issue/24232/256867
  135. Tebaldi, E. ve Elmslie, B. (2008). Institutions, innovation and economic growth. (MPRA Paper No. 9683). Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/9683/
  136. Topuz, S. G. ve Dağdemir, Ö. (2016). Ekonomik büyüme ve gelir eşitsizliği ilişkisi: Kuznets ters-U hipotezi’nin geçerliliği. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 11(13), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.272308
  137. Töngür, Ü. ve Elveren, A. Y. (2013). Military expenditures, income inequality, welfare and political regimes: a dynamic panel data analysis. Defence and Peace Economics, 26(1), 49-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2013.848577
  138. Ucal M., Karabulut G. ve Bilgin M. H. (2009). Military expenditures and inequality: empirical evidence from Israel. (MPRA Paper No. 48643). Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/48643
  139. Ulubasoglu, M. A. ve Doucouliagos, C. (2004). Institutions and economic growth: a systems approach. http://repec.org/esAUSM04/up.29323.1076501864.pdf
  140. UN, (2024, 12 Kasım). Reduce inequality within and among countries. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal10
  141. Vadlamannati, K. C. (2008). Exploring the relationship between military spending & income inequality in South Asia. (William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 918). The University of Michigan. https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64381
  142. Wan, G., Lu, M. ve Chen, Z. (2006). The inequality–growth nexus in the short and long run: empirical evidence from China. Journal of Comparative Economic, 34(4), 654-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2006.08.004
  143. Wang, M. L., Ntim, V. S., Yang, J., Zheng, Q. ve Geng, L. (2021). Effect of institutional quality and foreign direct investment on economic growth and environmental quality: evidence from African countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 4065-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.2010112
  144. Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2016a). Military expenditure and income distribution in South Korea. Defence and Peace Economics, 27(4), 571–581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2014.960247
  145. Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2016b). Defence spending and income inequality in Taiwan. Defence and Peace Economics, 27(6), 871–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2014.886436
  146. Yang, Y. ve Greaney, T. M. (2017). Economic growth and income inequality in the Asia-Pacific region: a comparative study of China, Japan, South Korea, and the United States. Journal of Asian Economics, 48, 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2016.10.008
  147. Zhuang, J., de Dios, E. ve Martin, A. L. (2010). Governance and institutional quality and the links with economic growth and income inequality: with special reference to developing Asia. (Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper No. 193). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1619116
  148. Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Altman, D.,. & Ziblatt, D. (2024). V-Dem Dataset v14. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/mcwt-fr58