SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 26

Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Student Attitudes and Academician Perspectives

Yükseköğretimde Yapay Zekâ: Öğrenci Tutumları ve Akademisyen Görüşleri

Hasan Selçuk Eti(TEKIRDAG NAMIK KEMAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3792-697X
Pages
132–153
Publication Date
2025-02-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Quantitative findings revealed positive student attitudes toward AI, with students reporting moderate competency in using AI tools, primarily for creative writing, image generation, and language learning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research aims to examine student attitudes and academic perspectives regarding the use of artificial intelligence in higher education through a mixed-method approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data was collected from 400 undergraduate students through surveys and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 academics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Quantitative findings revealed positive student attitudes toward AI, with students reporting moderate competency in using AI tools, primarily for creative writing, image generation, and language learning.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yapay zeka · yükseköğretim · öğrenci tutumları

Abstract

This research aims to examine student attitudes and academic perspectives regarding the use of artificial intelligence in higher education through a mixed-method approach. Data was collected from 400 undergraduate students through surveys and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 academics. Quantitative findings revealed positive student attitudes toward AI, with students reporting moderate competency in using AI tools, primarily for creative writing, image generation, and language learning. Students highlighted advantages such as personalized learning opportunities and easier understanding of complex topics, while expressing concerns about educational inequalities and misinformation risks. Qualitative findings showed academics maintaining both positive and cautious stances toward AI technologies. Academics recognized AI's potential in research, data analysis, and educational support, while expressing concerns about the weakening of basic skills and data security. They anticipate a comprehensive transformation in higher education and emphasize the need for a thorough approach to AI's effective and ethical use. The research concludes that while AI integration in higher education is inevitable, institutional policies and regulations are essential for its effective and ethical implementation.

Özet

Bu araştırma, yükseköğretimde yapay zekâ kullanımına ilişkin öğrenci tutumlarını ve akademisyen görüşlerini karma yöntem yaklaşımıyla incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Veriler, 400 lisans öğrencisinden anket yoluyla ve 10 akademisyenle gerçekleştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmelerle toplanmıştır. Nicel bulgular, öğrencilerin yapay zekâya yönelik olumlu tutum sergilediğini göstermiş, öğrenciler yapay zekâ araçlarını kullanmada orta düzeyde yetkinlik bildirmiş ve bunları öncelikle yaratıcı yazım, görsel oluşturma ve dil öğrenme amacıyla kullandıklarını belirtmişlerdir. Öğrenciler, kişiselleştirilmiş öğrenme fırsatları ve karmaşık konuları daha kolay anlama gibi avantajları vurgularken, eğitimde eşitsizlikler ve yanlış bilgi riskleri konusunda endişelerini dile getirmişlerdir. Nitel bulgular, akademisyenlerin yapay zekâ teknolojilerine karşı hem olumlu hem de temkinli bir duruş sergilediğini göstermiştir. Akademisyenler, yapay zekânın araştırma, veri analizi ve eğitim desteğindeki potansiyelini kabul ederken, temel becerilerin zayıflaması ve veri güvenliği konularında endişe duymaktadır. Yükseköğretimde kapsamlı bir dönüşüm öngören akademisyenler, yapay zekânın etkili ve etik kullanımı için detaylı bir yaklaşımın gerekliliğini vurgulamaktadır. Araştırma, yükseköğretimde yapay zekâ entegrasyonunun kaçınılmaz olduğu, ancak etkili ve etik uygulama için kurumsal politika ve düzenlemelerin gerekli olduğu sonucuna varmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Eti, H. S. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Student Attitudes and Academician Perspectives. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 26, 132–153. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1588001

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Al-Zahrani, A. M. ve Alasmari, T. M. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: The dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4
  2. Arif, A. (2023). Investigating students' attitudes & trust in AI during COVID-19. Journal of Student Research, 12(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.5015
  3. Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O. ve Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform higher education?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x
  4. Bobrytska, V. I., Krasylnykova, H. V., Beseda, N. A. ve Smirnova, I. M. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) in Ukrainian higher education: A comprehensive study of stakeholder attitudes, expectations and concerns. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.20
  5. Chatterjee, S. ve Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3443-3463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7
  6. Chu, H., Tu, Y. ve Yang, K. (2022). Roles and research trends of artifcial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7526
  7. Creswell, J. W. ve Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
  8. Crompton, H. ve Burke, D. (2023). Artifcial intelligence in higher education: the state of the feld. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, (20), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
  9. Dhawan, S. ve Batra, G. (2020). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Promises, perils, and perspective. Expanding Knowledge Horizon. OJAS, 11, 11-22.
  10. Glaser, B. ve Strauss, A. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206
  11. Göksel, N. ve Bozkurt, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Current insights and future perspectives. S. Şişman-Uğur ve G. Kurubacak (Ed.), Handbook of research on learning in the age of transhumanism içinde (s. 224-236). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8431-5.ch014
  12. Kaya, F., Aydin, F., Schepman, A., Rodway, P., Yetişensoy, O. ve Demir-Kaya, M. (2022). The roles of personality traits, al anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730
  13. Khlaif, Z. N., Ayyoub, A., Hamamra, B. ve Bensalem, E. (2024). University teachers' views on the adoption and integration of generative AI tools for student assessment in higher education. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1090. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101090
  14. Kuleto, V., Ilić, M., Dumangiu, M., Ranković, M., Martins, O. M., Păun, D. ve Mihoreanu, L. (2021). Exploring opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence and machine learning in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 13(18), 10424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810424
  15. Ma, D., Akram, H. ve Chen, I. H. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A cross-cultural examination of students' behavioral intentions and attitudes. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7703
  16. Mah, D. K. ve Groß, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, distinct profiles, and professional development needs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00490-1
  17. McGrath, C., Pargman, T. C., Juth, N. ve Palmgren, P. J. (2023). University teachers' perceptions of responsibility and artificial intelligence in higher education-An experimental philosophical study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100139
  18. Miles, M, B. ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
  19. Ocaña-Fernández, Y., Valenzuela-Fernández, L. A. ve Garro-Aburto, L. L. (2019). Artificial intelligence and its implications in higher education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(2), 553-568. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n2.274
  20. Ouyang, F., Zheng, L. ve Jiao, P. (2022). Artifcial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011–2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
  21. Pisica, A. I., Edu, T., Zaharia, R. M. ve Zaharia, R. (2023). Implementing artificial intelligence in higher education: Pros and cons from the perspectives of academics. Societies, 13(5), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13050118
  22. Popenici, S. A. ve Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
  23. Rodway, P. ve Schepman, A. (2023). The impact of adopting AI educational technologies on projected course satisfaction in university students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100150
  24. Schepman, A. ve Rodway, P. (2020). Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 1, 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014
  25. Şahin, M. G. ve Yıldırım, Y. (2024). The general attitudes towards artificial intelligence (GAAIS): A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 11(2), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1369023
  26. Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi. (2024, 03 Ekim). Sayılarla Üniversitemiz. https://www.nku.edu.tr/sayilarlauniversitemiz
  27. UNESCO. (2023, 04 Eylül). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. https://eduq.info/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11515/38828/ChatGPT-Artificial-Intelligence-in-higher-education-Quick-Start-guide_UNESCO-2023.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
  28. Yalcinkaya, T., Ergin, E. ve Yucel, S. C. (2024). Exploring nursing students' attitudes and readiness for artificial ıntelligence: A cross-sectional study. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 19(4), e722-e728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.07.008
  29. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  30. Yurt, E. ve Kaşarcı, I. (2024). A questionnaire of artificial intelligence use motives: A contribution to investigating the connection between AI and motivation. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(2), 308-325. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.725
  31. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M. ve Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–Where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0